Using UAV-Based Multispectral Imagery, Data-Driven Models, and Spatial Cross-Validation for Corn Grain Yield Prediction

被引:0
作者
Killeen, Patrick [1 ]
Kiringa, Iluju [1 ]
Yeap, Tet [1 ]
Branco, Paula [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
2023 23RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING WORKSHOPS, ICDMW 2023 | 2023年
关键词
precision agriculture; remote sensing; unmanned; aerial vehicle; hyperparameter tuning; multispectral imagery; machine learning; deep learning; yield prediction; spatial data; spatial cross-validation;
D O I
10.1109/ICDMW60847.2023.00111
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Input cost reductions and yield optimization can be done using yield precision maps created by machine learning models to address the increase in food demand predicted by 2050. However, without taking into account the spatial structure of the data, the precision map's accuracy evaluation assessment runs the risk of being overly optimistic. In the current work, a corn yield prediction study was conducted, and the predictive abilities of two vegetation indices (VIs) and five spectral bands for a single image acquisition date were evaluated. We also examined the impacts of image spatial and spectral resolution on model performance. We used a Canadian smart farm's yield data, multispectral (MS) and red-green-blue (RGB) imagery captured by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and we trained deep neural networks (DNN), random forest (RF), and linear regression (LR) models using standard cross-validation and spatial crossvalidation approaches. We found that multi-band datasets led to better performance than single-VI datasets. MS imagery led to generally better performance than RGB imagery. High spatial resolution imagery led to better performance than lower spatial resolution imagery. RF was the best performing model while LR was the worst. The choice of RF's hyperparameters had more of an impact on performance when the number of features was small and less of an impact when the number of features was large or when the input dataset had a lot of spatial structure.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 831
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] ArcGIS Pro, Semivariogram and covariance functions
  • [2] The Digitisation of Agriculture: a Survey of Research Activities on Smart Farming
    Bacco, Manlio
    Barsocchi, Paolo
    Ferro, Erina
    Gotta, Alberto
    Ruggeri, Massimiliano
    [J]. ARRAY, 2019, 3-4
  • [3] Deep density estimation based on multi-spectral remote sensing data for in-field crop yield forecasting
    Baghdasaryan, Liana
    Melikbekyan, Razmik
    Dolmajain, Arthur
    Hobbs, Jennifer
    [J]. 2022 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION WORKSHOPS, CVPRW 2022, 2022, : 2013 - 2022
  • [4] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [5] Sugarcane Yield Mapping Using High-Resolution Imagery Data and Machine Learning Technique
    Canata, Tatiana Fernanda
    Wei, Marcelo Chan Fu
    Maldaner, Leonardo Felipe
    Molin, Jose Paulo
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (02) : 1 - 14
  • [6] Cumulative temporal vegetation indices from unoccupied aerial systems allow maize (Zea mays L.) hybrid yield to be estimated across environments with fewer flights
    Chatterjee, Sumantra
    Adak, Alper
    Wilde, Scott
    Nakasagga, Shakirah
    Murray, Seth C.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [7] Cheng T., 2018, Hyperspectral Indices and Image Classifications for Agriculture and Vegetation: Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Vegetation, DOI 10.1201/9781315159331-6
  • [8] Chu Su P., 2011, Master's thesis
  • [9] UAV-based multispectral remote sensing for precision agriculture: A comparison between different cameras
    Deng, Lei
    Mao, Zhihui
    Li, Xiaojuan
    Hu, Zhuowei
    Duan, Fuzhou
    Yan, Yanan
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 146 : 124 - 136
  • [10] AI-DRIVEN MAIZE YIELD FORECASTING USING UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLEBASED HYPERSPECTRAL AND LIDAR DATA FUSION
    Dilmurat, Kamila
    Sagan, Vasit
    Moose, Stephen
    [J]. XXIV ISPRS CONGRESS: IMAGING TODAY, FORESEEING TOMORROW, COMMISSION III, 2022, 5-3 : 193 - 199