Nudging farmers to reduce water pollution from nitrogen fertilizer

被引:25
作者
Chai, Yuan [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Pannell, David J. [3 ]
Pardey, Philip G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Appl Econ, St Paul, MN USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, GEMS Informat Ctr, St Paul, MN USA
[3] Univ Western Australia, Ctr Environm Econ & Policy, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] 248C Ruttan Hall,1994 Buford Ave, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
Water pollution; Nitrogen fertilizer; Optimal nitrogen rate; Production risk; Flat payoff function; Behavioral science; RISK-AVERSION; LAND-TENURE; PHOSPHORUS LOSSES; PAYOFF FUNCTIONS; UNITED-STATES; SOCIAL NORMS; MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION; ADOPTION; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102525
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Nitrogen sourced from agricultural fertilizers is a major contributor to water pollution. Despite policies targeting a range of farming practice changes, the goal of substantially reducing nitrogen losses from farms remains elusive. We highlight three empirical results from production economics that appear to provide opportunities for behavioral science to contribute to reducing nitrogen pollution. First, many farmers apply more nitrogen than required to maximize expected profits or utility. Second, contrary to the perceptions of some farmers and farm advisers, nitrogen fertilizer is a risk-increasing input. Third, the relationship between fertilizer rate and profit is flat near the optimum, meaning that farmers can reduce fertilizer usage to some extent at minimal private cost. We discuss a variety of ways in which behavioral science, likely complemented with new market instruments and technological innovations, could exploit these insights to generate efficient policy options.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 123 条
[1]  
Agflex Inc, 2011, Conservation Innovation Grant NRCS #68-3A75-6-114
[2]   Analysis of wheat farmers' risk perceptions and attitudes: evidence from Punjab, Pakistan [J].
Ahmad, Dilshad ;
Afzal, Muhammad ;
Rauf, Abdur .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2019, 95 (03) :845-861
[3]   Differences in phosphorus and nitrogen delivery to the gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi river basin [J].
Alexander, Richard B. ;
Smith, Richard A. ;
Schwarz, Gregory E. ;
Boyer, Elizabeth W. ;
Nolan, Jacqueline V. ;
Brakebill, John W. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (03) :822-830
[4]  
ANDERSON JR, 1975, J AUST I AGR SCI, V41, P195
[5]   Finding the Right Value: Framing Effects on Domain Experts [J].
Andrews, Amelia C. ;
Clawson, Rosalee A. ;
Gramig, Benjamin M. ;
Raymond, Leigh .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 38 (02) :261-278
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Water Implications of Biofuels Production in the United States
[7]   ECONOMETRIC ESTIMATION OF PRODUCERS RISK ATTITUDES [J].
ANTLE, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1987, 69 (03) :509-522
[8]   Optimum Nitrogen Rates for Maize and Wheat in North Carolina [J].
Austin, Robert ;
Osmond, Deanna ;
Shelton, Shelby .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2019, 111 (05) :2558-2568
[9]   USING CUMULATIVE PROSPECT THEORY TO EXPLAIN ANOMALOUS CROP INSURANCE COVERAGE CHOICE [J].
Babcock, Bruce A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 97 (05) :1371-1384
[10]   Making more effective use of human behavioural science in conservation interventions [J].
Balmford, Andrew ;
Bradbury, Richard B. ;
Bauer, Jan M. ;
Broad, Steven ;
Burgess, Gayle ;
Burgman, Mark ;
Byerly, Hilary ;
Clayton, Susan ;
Espelosin, Dulce ;
Ferraro, Paul J. ;
Fisher, Brendan ;
Garnett, Emma E. ;
Jones, Julia P. G. ;
Marteau, Theresa M. ;
Otieno, Mark ;
Polasky, Stephen ;
Ricketts, Taylor H. ;
Sandbrook, Chris ;
Sullivan-Wiley, Kira ;
Trevelyan, Rosie ;
van der Linden, Sander ;
Verissimo, Diogo ;
Nielsen, Kristian Steensen .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 261