Three steps to open science for qualitative research in psychology

被引:15
作者
Branney, Peter E. [1 ]
Brooks, Joanna [2 ]
Kilby, Laura [3 ]
Newman, Kristina [4 ]
Norris, Emma [5 ,6 ]
Pownall, Madeleine [7 ]
Talbot, Catherine V. [8 ]
Treharne, Gareth J. [9 ]
Whitaker, Candice M. [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bradford, Fac Management Law & Social Sci, Sch Social Sci, Dept Psychol, Bradford, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester Ctr Hlth Psychol, Div Psychol & Mental Hlth, Manchester, England
[3] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Dept Psychol Sociol & Polit, Sheffield, England
[4] Nottingham Trent Univ, Dept Psychol, Nottingham, England
[5] Brunel Univ London, Dept Hlth Sci, Div Global Hlth, London, England
[6] UCL, Ctr Behav Change, London, England
[7] Univ Leeds, Sch Psychol, Leeds, England
[8] Bournemouth Univ, Dept Psychol, Poole, England
[9] Te Whare Wananga o Otago The Univ Otago, Te Tari Whakamatau Hinekaro Dept Psychol, Dunedin, New Zealand
[10] Leeds Trinity Univ, Fac Social & Hlth Sci, Sch Psychol & Therapeut Studies, Leeds, England
关键词
authorship; contributorship; FAIR principles; open data; open science; pre-registration; qualitative methods; registered report; MULTIPLE AUTHORSHIP; PENILE CANCER; ISSUES; WORKING; CREDIT;
D O I
10.1111/spc3.12728
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Principles and applications of open science (also referred to as open research or open scholarship) in psychology have emerged in response to growing concerns about the replicability, transparency, reproducibility, and robustness of psychological research alongside global moves to open science in many fields. Our objective in this paper is to inform ways of collectively constructing open science practices and systems that are appropriate to, and get the best out of, the full range of qualitative and mixed-method approaches used in psychology. We achieve this by describing three areas of open research practice (contributorship, pre-registration, and open data) and explore how and why qualitative researchers might consider engaging with these in ways that are compatible with a qualitative research paradigm. We argue it is crucial that open research practices do not (even inadvertently) exclude qualitative research, and that qualitative researchers reflect on how we can meaningfully engage with open science in psychology.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [1] Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
    Aarts, Alexander A.
    Anderson, Joanna E.
    Anderson, Christopher J.
    Attridge, Peter R.
    Attwood, Angela
    Axt, Jordan
    Babel, Molly
    Bahnik, Stepan
    Baranski, Erica
    Barnett-Cowan, Michael
    Bartmess, Elizabeth
    Beer, Jennifer
    Bell, Raoul
    Bentley, Heather
    Beyan, Leah
    Binion, Grace
    Borsboom, Denny
    Bosch, Annick
    Bosco, Frank A.
    Bowman, Sara D.
    Brandt, Mark J.
    Braswell, Erin
    Brohmer, Hilmar
    Brown, Benjamin T.
    Brown, Kristina
    Bruening, Jovita
    Calhoun-Sauls, Ann
    Callahan, Shannon P.
    Chagnon, Elizabeth
    Chandler, Jesse
    Chartier, Christopher R.
    Cheung, Felix
    Christopherson, Cody D.
    Cillessen, Linda
    Clay, Russ
    Cleary, Hayley
    Cloud, Mark D.
    Cohn, Michael
    Cohoon, Johanna
    Columbus, Simon
    Cordes, Andreas
    Costantini, Giulio
    Alvarez, Leslie D. Cramblet
    Cremata, Ed
    Crusius, Jan
    DeCoster, Jamie
    DeGaetano, Michelle A.
    Della Penna, Nicolas
    den Bezemer, Bobby
    Deserno, Marie K.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2015, 349 (6251)
  • [2] Qualitative data sharing and synthesis for sustainability science
    Alexander, Steven M.
    Jones, Kristal
    Bennett, Nathan J.
    Budden, Amber
    Cox, Michael
    Crosas, Merce
    Game, Edward T.
    Geary, Janis
    Hardy, R. Dean
    Johnson, Jay T.
    Karcher, Sebastian
    Motzer, Nicole
    Pittman, Jeremy
    Randell, Heather
    Silva, Julie A.
    Da Silva, Patricia Pinto
    Strasser, Carly
    Strawhacker, Colleen
    Stuhl, Andrew
    Weber, Nic
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3 (02) : 81 - 88
  • [3] How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship
    Allen, Liz
    O'Connell, Alison
    Kiermer, Veronique
    [J]. LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2019, 32 (01) : 71 - 74
  • [4] Credit where credit is due
    Allen, Liz
    Brand, Amy
    Scott, Jo
    Altman, Micah
    Hlava, Marjorie
    [J]. NATURE, 2014, 508 (7496) : 312 - 313
  • [5] American Psychological Association, CERT COMPL APA ETH P
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1997, JAMA, V277, P927
  • [7] [Anonymous], GO FAIR IN MAK YOUR
  • [8] Journal Article Reporting Standards for Quantitative Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report
    Appelbaum, Mark
    Cooper, Harris
    Kline, Rex B.
    Mayo-Wilson, Evan
    Nezu, Arthur M.
    Rao, Stephen M.
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2018, 73 (01) : 3 - 25
  • [9] Ashdown J., 2018, The Palgrave handbook of
  • [10] Accounting for research fatigue in research ethics
    Ashley, Florence
    [J]. BIOETHICS, 2021, 35 (03) : 270 - 276