European policies for public health in border regions: no European mindset as yet

被引:0
作者
van der Zanden, Brigitte A. M. [1 ,2 ]
Hoebe, Christian J. P. A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Horstman, Klasien [5 ]
机构
[1] Fdn euPrevent, Het Overloon 2, NL-6411 TE Heerlen, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Care & Publ Hlth Res Inst CAPHRI, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Dept Social Med, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] South Limburg Publ Hlth Serv, Dept Sexual Hlth Infect Dis & Environm Hlth, Living Lab Publ Hlth Mosa, POB 33, NL-6400 AA Heerlen, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Care & Publ Hlth Res Inst CAPHRI, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Med Ctr MUMC,Dept Med Microbiol Infect Dis & Infec, POB 5800, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, Care & Publ Hlth Res Inst CAPHRI, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Dept Hlth Eth & Soc, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
European Union; Narrative policy analysis; Public health; Prevention; Health promotion; European knowledge structure; Border regions; Cross-border;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-024-18175-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe sudden emergence of COVID-19 in 2020 demonstrated that Europe was not prepared for a public health crisis like this pandemic. In the European Union, matters of health have remained primarily under the jurisdiction of individual Member States. However, certain events, such as the Kohll-Decker ruling on free mobility of health services and the COVID-19 pandemic, compelled the EU to address health matters in border regions. This study examines how EU policies address public health in border regions. To that end, we have drawn from border studies, a field that provides insight into the fluidity and complexity of borders in everyday life. Besides that we used constructivist policy studies as a lens for the analysis of EU policy documents.MethodsA policy discourse analysis was conducted to explore how European policy addresses the development of a transnational, European public health in border regions. Key European policy documents published between 2002 and 2027 were analysed to understand how policies are constructed and problems are framed. The analysis was guided by research questions and the theoretical approach.ResultsThe analysis reveals that, while having limited competences in the field of health care, the EU is slowly developing a rationale and a knowledge base to increase its competences in health care. It also shows that in the field of public health, the EU argues for addressing health determinants and promoting healthy lifestyles, though it does not address health promotion in border regions. The EU's authority in public health in border regions revolves primarily around addressing physical, biological and chemical threats rather than social health problems.ConclusionThough the EU has carefully developed a transnational perspective on health care, the EU has not developed any authority with respect to transnational public health. Though public health and health promotion in border regions have been confronted with specific challenges, neither specific Member States nor the EU have a transnational collaborative perspective that does justice to the characteristics of border regions. When it comes to public health in border regions, there is no European mindset as yet.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, Off. J. Eur. Union, V59, P1
  • [3] Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP)
    Ricci, Antonia
    Allende, Ana
    Bolton, Declan
    Chemaly, Marianne
    Davies, Robert
    Fernandez Escamez, Pablo Salvador
    Girones, Rosina
    Herman, Lieve
    Koutsoumanis, Kostas
    Lindqvist, Roland
    Norrung, Birgit
    Robertson, Lucy
    Ru, Giuseppe
    Sanaa, Moez
    Skandamis, Panagiotis
    Snary, Emma
    Speybroeck, Niko
    Ter Kuile, Benno
    Threlfall, John
    Wahlstrom, Helene
    Adkin, Amie
    Greiner, Matthias
    Marchis, Daniela
    Prado, Marta
    Felicio, Teresa Da Silva
    Ortiz-Pelaez, Angel
    Simmons, Marion
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2018, 16 (07)
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2004, The Official Journal of the European Union, V47, P1
  • [5] Asdal Kristin., 2015, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal Of Social Theory, V16, P74
  • [6] Bacchi C., 2012, Open Journal of Political Science, V02, P1, DOI [DOI 10.4236/OJPS.2012.21001, 10.4236/ojps.2012.21001]
  • [7] Bacchi C., 2016, Poststructural policy analysis: A guide to practice
  • [8] The politics of research management: Reflections on the gap between what we 'know' (about SDH) and what we do
    Bacchi, Carol
    [J]. HEALTH SOCIOLOGY REVIEW, 2008, 17 (02): : 165 - 176
  • [9] Problematizations in Health Policy: Questioning How "Problems" Are Constituted in Policies
    Bacchi, Carol
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2016, 6 (02):
  • [10] Political situations: knowledge controversies in transnational governance
    Barry, Andrew
    [J]. CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES, 2012, 6 (03) : 324 - 336