Reliable Prostate Cancer Risk Mapping From MRI Using Targeted and Systematic Core Needle Biopsy Histopathology

被引:0
作者
Zeevi, Tal [1 ]
Leapman, Michael S. [2 ]
Sprenkle, Preston C. [2 ]
Venkataraman, Rajesh [3 ]
Staib, Lawrence H. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Onofrey, John A. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Dept Urol, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Eigen Hlth, Grass Valley, CA USA
[4] Yale Univ, Dept Radiol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[5] Yale Univ, Dept Radiol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
Cancer risk mapping; core needle biopsy; focal therapy; machine learning reliability; magnetic resonance imaging; personalized medicine; prostate cancer; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE;
D O I
10.1109/TBME.2023.3326799
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective: To compute a dense prostate cancer risk map for the individual patient post-biopsy from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to provide a more reliable evaluation of its fitness in prostate regions that were not identified as suspicious for cancer by a human-reader in pre- and intra-biopsy imaging analysis. Methods: Low-level pre-biopsy MRI biomarkers from targeted and non-targeted biopsy locations were extracted and statistically tested for representativeness against biomarkers from non-biopsied prostate regions. A probabilistic machine learning classifier was optimized to map biomarkers to their core-level pathology, followed by extrapolation of pathology scores to non-biopsied prostate regions. Goodness-of-fit was assessed at targeted and non-targeted biopsy locations for the post-biopsy individual patient. Results: Our experiments showed high predictability of imaging biomarkers in differentiating histopathology scores in thousands of non-targeted core-biopsy locations (ROC-AUCs: 0.85-0.88), but also high variability between patients (Median ROC-AUC [IQR]: 0.81-0.89 [0.29-0.40]). Conclusion: The sparseness of prostate biopsy data makes the validation of a whole gland risk mapping a non-trivial task. Previous studies i) focused on targeted-biopsy locations although biopsy-specimens drawn from systematically scattered locations across the prostate constitute a more representative sample to non-biopsied regions, and ii) estimated prediction-power across predicted instances (e.g., biopsy specimens) with no patient distinction, which may lead to unreliable estimation of model fitness to the individual patient due to variation between patients in instance count, imaging characteristics, and pathologies. Significance: This study proposes a personalized whole-gland prostate cancer risk mapping post-biopsy to allow clinicians to better stage and personalize focal therapy treatment plans.
引用
收藏
页码:1084 / 1091
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Patterns of Repeat Prostate Biopsy in Contemporary Clinical Practice
    Abraham, Nitya E.
    Mendhiratta, Neil
    Taneja, Samir S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04) : 1178 - 1184
  • [2] Combination of Peri-Tumoral and Intra-Tumoral Radiomic Features on Bi-Parametric MRI Accurately Stratifies Prostate Cancer Risk: A Multi-Site Study
    Algohary, Ahmad
    Shiradkar, Rakesh
    Pahwa, Shivani
    Purysko, Andrei
    Verma, Sadhna
    Moses, Daniel
    Shnier, Ronald
    Haynes, Anne-Maree
    Delprado, Warick
    Thompson, James
    Tirumani, Sreeharsha
    Mahran, Amr
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Ponsky, Lee
    Stricker, Phillip D.
    Madabhushi, Anant
    [J]. CANCERS, 2020, 12 (08) : 1 - 14
  • [3] A Deep Learning-Based Approach for the Detection and Localization of Prostate Cancer in T2 Magnetic Resonance Images
    Alkadi, Ruba
    Taher, Fatma
    El-baz, Ayman
    Werghi, Naoufel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2019, 32 (05) : 793 - 807
  • [4] Machine learning classifiers can predict Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer with greater accuracy than experienced radiologists
    Antonelli, Michela
    Johnston, Edward W.
    Dikaios, Nikolaos
    Cheung, King K.
    Sidhu, Harbir S.
    Appayya, Mrishta B.
    Giganti, Francesco
    Simmons, Lucy A. M.
    Freeman, Alex
    Allen, Clare
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Atkinson, David
    Ourselin, Sebastien
    Punwani, Shonit
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (09) : 4754 - 4764
  • [5] A Randomized Controlled Trial To Assess and Compare the Outcomes of Two-core Prostate Biopsy Guided by Fused Magnetic Resonance and Transrectal Ultrasound Images and Traditional 12-core Systematic Biopsy
    Baco, Eduard
    Rud, Erik
    Eri, Lars Magne
    Moen, Gunnar
    Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
    Svindland, Aud
    Eggesbo, Heidi B.
    Ukimura, Osamu
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 149 - 156
  • [6] On a new multivariate two-sample test
    Baringhaus, L
    Franz, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS, 2004, 88 (01) : 190 - 206
  • [7] Joint Prostate Cancer Detection and Gleason Score Prediction in mp-MRI via FocalNet
    Cao, Ruiming
    Bajgiran, Amirhossein Mohammadian
    Mirak, Sohrab Afshari
    Shakeri, Sepideh
    Zhong, Xinran
    Enzmann, Dieter
    Raman, Steven
    Sung, Kyunghyun
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 38 (11) : 2496 - 2506
  • [8] The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository
    Clark, Kenneth
    Vendt, Bruce
    Smith, Kirk
    Freymann, John
    Kirby, Justin
    Koppel, Paul
    Moore, Stephen
    Phillips, Stanley
    Maffitt, David
    Pringle, Michael
    Tarbox, Lawrence
    Prior, Fred
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2013, 26 (06) : 1045 - 1057
  • [9] Ganz PA, 2012, ANN INTERN MED, V156, P591, DOI [10.7326/0003-4819-156-8-201204170-00010, 10.7326/0003-4819-156-8-201204170-00401]
  • [10] Prostate Cancer Screening with PSA and MRI Followed by Targeted Biopsy Only
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Mansson, Marianne
    Wallstrom, Jonas
    Axcrona, Ulrika
    Carlsson, Sigrid V.
    Egevad, Lars
    Geterud, Kjell
    Khatami, Ali
    Kohestani, Kimia
    Pihl, Carl-Gustaf
    Socratous, Andreas
    Stranne, Johan
    Godtman, Rebecka Arnsrud
    Hellstrom, Mikael
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 387 (23) : 2126 - 2137