The anatomy of conspiracy theorists: Unveiling traits using a comprehensive Twitter dataset

被引:4
作者
Gambini, Margherita [1 ,2 ]
Tardelli, Serena [2 ]
Tesconi, Maurizio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Informat Engn, Via Girolamo Caruso 16, I-56122 Pisa, Italy
[2] CNR, Inst Informat & Telemat, Via Giuseppe Moruzzi 1, I-56127 Pisa, Italy
关键词
Conspiracy; Machine learning; Social media dataset; Comparative analysis; MISINFORMATION; LANGUAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.comcom.2024.01.027
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The discourse around conspiracy theories is currently thriving amidst the rampant misinformation in online environments. Research in this field has been focused on detecting conspiracy theories on social media, often relying on limited datasets. In this study, we present a novel methodology for constructing a Twitter dataset that encompasses accounts engaged in conspiracy -related activities throughout the year 2022. Our approach centers on data collection that is independent of specific conspiracy theories and information operations. Additionally, our dataset includes a control group comprising randomly selected users who can be fairly compared to the individuals involved in conspiracy activities. This comprehensive collection effort yielded a total of 15K accounts and 37M tweets extracted from their timelines. We conduct a comparative analysis of the two groups across three dimensions: topics, profiles, and behavioral characteristics. The results indicate that conspiracy and control users exhibit similarity in terms of their profile metadata characteristics. However, they diverge significantly in terms of behavior and activity, particularly regarding the discussed topics, the terminology used, and their stance on trending subjects. In addition, we find no significant disparity in the presence of bot users between the two groups. Finally, we develop a classifier to identify conspiracy users using features borrowed from bot, troll and linguistic literature. The results demonstrate a high accuracy level (with an F1 score of 0.94), enabling us to uncover the most discriminating features associated with conspiracy -related accounts.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 40
页数:16
相关论文
共 69 条
[31]   Pathways to conspiracy: The social and linguistic precursors of involvement in Reddit's conspiracy theory forum [J].
Klein, Colin ;
Clutton, Peter ;
Dunn, Adam G. .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (11)
[32]   Motivated Rejection of Science [J].
Lewandowsky, Stephan ;
Oberauer, Klaus .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 25 (04) :217-222
[33]  
Mahl D., 2021, Social Media + Society, V7
[34]   Conspiracy theories in online environments: An interdisciplinary literature review and agenda for future research [J].
Mahl, Daniela ;
Schafer, Mike S. ;
Zeng, Jing .
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2023, 25 (07) :1781-1801
[35]  
Mallapaty S., 2023, NATURE
[36]   Retweeting: its linguistic and epistemic value [J].
Marsili, Neri .
SYNTHESE, 2021, 198 (11) :10457-10483
[37]   Investigating the difference between trolls, social bots, and humans on Twitter [J].
Mazza, Michele ;
Avvenuti, Marco ;
Cresci, Stefano ;
Tesconi, Maurizio .
COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 196 :23-36
[38]  
Metaxas P., 2019, Technol. Sci
[39]  
Miller Daniel Taninecz, 2021, First Monday
[40]  
Mitra T, 2018, P INT AAAI C WEB SOC, V12