Nutritional Value of Duckweed as Protein Feed for Broiler Chickens-Digestibility of Crude Protein, Amino Acids and Phosphorus

被引:18
作者
Demann, Johannes [1 ,2 ]
Petersen, Finn [2 ]
Dusel, Georg [3 ]
Bog, Manuela [4 ]
Devlamynck, Reindert [5 ]
Ulbrich, Andreas [2 ]
Olfs, Hans-Werner [2 ]
Westendarp, Heiner [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rostock, Fac Agr & Environm Sci, D-18059 Rostock, Germany
[2] Univ Appl Sci Osnabruck, Fac Agr Sci & Landscape Architecture, D-49090 Osnabruck, Germany
[3] Univ Appl Sci Bingen, Life Sci & Engn, D-55411 Bingen Am Rhein, Germany
[4] Univ Greifswald, Inst Bot & Landscape Ecol, D-17489 Greifswald, Germany
[5] Inagro vzw, B-8800 Rumbeke Beitem, Belgium
关键词
tannin; phytate; animal performance; feed intake; water binding capacity; SOYBEAN-MEAL; METABOLIZABLE ENERGY; BONE MEAL; FISH-MEAL; IN-VITRO; DIETS; PERFORMANCE; POLYRHIZA; CALCIUM; TANNIN;
D O I
10.3390/ani13010130
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary An increasing global population will lead to an increased demand for protein and a protein deficit. The production of soy, the most common protein source in animal nutrition, is often associated with deforestation and long transport distances. In this context, duckweed can be considered an alternative protein source for animal nutrition. The term duckweed describes a group of small plants floating on the water surface with sizes up to 1.5 cm. Three different duckweed batches consisting of different species were tested as feed for broiler chickens. They showed different impacts on feed intake, animal growth, and digestibility. Digestibility describes the share of nutrients resorbed within the digestive system. Possible compounds that inhibited the digestibility were identified. The results suggest that the nutritional value of duckweed and its influence on animal performance are variable. Hence, a stable duckweed biomass quality adapted to the requirements of broilers is needed. Duckweed is gaining attention in animal nutrition and is considered as a potential alternative protein source for broiler chickens. In order to evaluate the nutritional value of duckweed, three individual batches were investigated. They consisted of a mixture of Lemna minuta and Lemna minor (A, 17.5% crude protein), Spirodela polyrhiza (B, 24.6% crude protein) and Lemna obscura (C, 37.0% crude protein). Treatment diets contained 50% batch A, 50% batch B, and 25, 50 and 75% of batch C. All diets were fed to broiler chickens (Ross 308) from an age of 21 to 27 days. Diets with a share of 50 and 75% of batch C led to decreased feed intake (109.3 and 74.9 g/day, respectively) compared to the control. Standardized ileal digestibility of crude protein and amino acids differed significantly between duckweed batches, at values for methionine between 49.9 and 90.4%. For all amino acids, batch A consistently had the lowest and batch C the highest digestibility. Batches had different tannin contents of 2943, 2890 and 303 mg/kg for batches A, B and C, respectively. The apparent ileal digestibility of phosphorus differed significantly between all batches (50.8-78.9%). Duckweed can be used as a protein feed for broiler chickens. However, a defined and stable biomass composition optimized for the requirements of broiler chickens is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Standardized ileal amino acid digestibility of meat and bone meal and soybean meal in laying hens and broilers [J].
Adedokun, S. A. ;
Jaynes, P. ;
El-Hack, M. E. Abd ;
Payne, R. L. ;
Applegate, T. J. .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2014, 93 (02) :420-428
[2]   Basal endogenous losses of amino acids in protein nutrition research for swine and poultry [J].
Adeola, O. ;
Xue, P. C. ;
Cowieson, A. J. ;
Ajuwon, K. M. .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 221 :274-283
[3]  
Akter M., 2011, BANGLADESH RES PUBL, V5, P251
[4]  
American Association of Cereal Chemists. Approved Methods Committee, 2000, APPR METH AM ASS CER
[5]  
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, BVL L 0000 1912015 0
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 13805201412 DIN EN
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2002, 14902200202 DIN EN I
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2017, 1729422017 DIN EN IS