Ultrasound Accuracy in Detection of Metastatic Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

被引:0
作者
Akrami, Majid [1 ]
Sefidbakht, Sepideh [2 ]
Golchini, Alireza [3 ,4 ]
Johari, Masoumeh Ghoddusi [1 ]
Shariat, Mehdi [1 ]
Tahmasebi, Sedigheh [1 ]
Zangouri, Vahid [1 ]
Keumarsi, Zahra [1 ]
Omidi, Ashkan [5 ]
Mashayekhi, Mohadeseh [6 ]
Mokhtari, Maral [6 ]
Talei, Abdolrasoul [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Breast Dis Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Dept Surg Oncol, Shiraz, Iran
[4] Gen Med Council, London, England
[5] Islamic Azad Univ Tehran, Fac Med, Sch Med, Tehran, Iran
[6] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Dept Pathol, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Ultrasound precision; NAC; Axillary downstaging; Lymph node involvement; Breast chemotherapy; THERAPY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.30476/mejc.2022.90917.1596
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: In the present paper, the main diagnostic tool for re-evaluation of axillary lymph node involvement and planning of surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is ultrasound whose accuracy we aimed to determine herein. The high precision of ultrasound in diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes in untreated patients is well known; however, its worth in patients who received NAC is highly controversial.Method: We enrolled 165 breast cancer patients receiving NAC in this retrospective cohort study. They all had undergone post-NAC ultrasound done before surgery. The ultrasound reports were reassessed and validated by a breast radiologist. Finally, the histopathology reports were compared to those of the ultrasound. Results: Among 165 surveyed post-NAC ultrasounds, 53 women had positive results and 112 had negative results. Pathology and ultrasound reports were accordant in 93 women and adverse in 112 others. The false negative rate of post-NAC axillary ultrasound was calculated as 60.6%. The sensitivity and specificity of post-NAC AxUS were 39.4% and 79%, respectively. After NAC, there were certain changes in ultrasound reports from positive to negative in 50% and pathologic complete clearance was observed in just 28% of the women who were initially clinically lymph node positive.Conclusion: Ultrasound was not found to be an accurate and appropriate tool for evaluation of axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients who receive NAC. By changing the primarily established surgical plan from ALND to SLNB, based on the ultrasound findings, patients may remain undertreated. Furthermore, the axillary nodes pathologic clearance after NAC was observed in less than one third of the women who were initially clinically node positive; accordingly, surgeons should be cautious about the optimum response of axillary metastatic lymph nodes to NAC.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 161
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Evolutionary history of metastatic breast cancer reveals minimal seeding from axillary lymph nodes [J].
Ullah, Ikram ;
Karthik, Govindasamy-Muralidharan ;
Alkodsi, Amjad ;
Kjallquist, Una ;
Stalhammar, Gustav ;
Lovrot, John ;
Martinez, Nelson-Fuentes ;
Lagergren, Jens ;
Hautaniemi, Sampsa ;
Hartman, Johan ;
Bergh, Jonas .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2018, 128 (04) :1355-1370
[32]   Nomogram Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Omission After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-positive Breast Cancer [J].
Seki, Hirohito ;
Ishiguro, Yuki ;
Makino, Akitsugu ;
Yamaguchi, Kei ;
Imoto, Shigeru .
ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 44 (11) :5131-5138
[33]   Selective Axillary Dissection after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Lymph-Node-Positive Breast Cancer (CLYP Study): The Radio-Guided Occult Lesion Localization Technique for Biopsy-Proven Metastatic Lymph Nodes [J].
Rella, Rossella ;
Conti, Marco ;
Bufi, Enida ;
Trombadori, Charlotte Marguerite Lucille ;
Di Leone, Alba ;
Terribile, Daniela ;
Masetti, Riccardo ;
Zagaria, Luca ;
Mule, Antonino ;
Morciano, Francesca ;
Franceschini, Gianluca ;
Belli, Paolo .
CANCERS, 2023, 15 (07)
[34]   Correlation between breast and axillary pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer [J].
Yildirim, Emine ;
Bektas, Sibel ;
Yetis, Firat ;
Yildiz, Eren Ozan ;
Ozdemir, Muhammed ;
Komut, Neslihan ;
Calik, Mustafa ;
Er, Ahmet Muzaffer .
ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2023, 94 (04) :336-345
[35]   The use of axillary ultrasound (AUS) to assess the nodal status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in primary breast cancer patients [J].
Leinert, Elena ;
Lukac, Stefan ;
Schwentner, Lukas ;
Coenen, Antonia ;
Fink, Visnja ;
Veselinovic, Kristina ;
Dayan, Davut ;
Janni, Wolfgang ;
Friedl, Thomas W. P. .
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2024, 52
[36]   Sentinel lymph node biopsy does not apply to all axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Ge, Wen-kai ;
Yang, Ben ;
Zuo, Wen-shu ;
Zheng, Gang ;
Dai, Ying-qi ;
Han, Chao ;
Yang, Li ;
Zheng, Mei-zhu .
THORACIC CANCER, 2014, 5 (06) :550-555
[37]   Axillary lymph node removal in de novo metastatic breast cancer [J].
Wu, Ya-Lin ;
Hong, Yi-Yan ;
Zhan, Hong-Liang ;
Zhang, Long-Ying ;
Wu, San-Gang ;
Zhang, Fu-Xing .
GLAND SURGERY, 2024, 13 (07) :1214-1228
[38]   The Number of Axillary Lymph Nodes Involved with Metastatic Breast Cancer Does not Affect Outcome as Long as All Disease is Confined to the Sentinel Lymph Nodes [J].
Jakub, James W. ;
Bryant, Kanesha ;
Huebner, Marianne ;
Hoskin, Tanya ;
Boughey, Judy C. ;
Reynolds, Carol ;
Degnim, Amy C. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (01) :86-93
[39]   Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast cancer-related lymphedema after axillary lymph node dissection: a retrospective cohort study [J].
Jia, Miaomiao ;
Pan, Lihui ;
Yang, Haibo ;
Gao, Jinnan ;
Guo, Fan .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2024, 204 (02) :223-235
[40]   Use of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Axillary Node-Positive Breast Cancer in Diagnosis [J].
Choi, Hee Jun ;
Kim, Isaac ;
Alsharif, Entad ;
Park, Sungmin ;
Kim, Jae-Myung ;
Ryu, Jai Min ;
Nam, Seok Jin ;
Kim, Seok Won ;
Yu, Jonghan ;
Lee, Se Kyung ;
Lee, Jeong Eon .
JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2018, 21 (04) :433-441