External validation of the Rotterdam prostate cancer risk calculator within a high-risk Dutch clinical cohort

被引:3
|
作者
Hagens, Marinus J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stelwagen, Piter J. [1 ,4 ]
Veerman, Hans [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rynja, Sybren P. [2 ,5 ]
Smeenge, Martijn [2 ,6 ]
van der Noort, Vincent [7 ]
Roeleveld, Ton A. [2 ,4 ]
van Kesteren, Jolien [1 ,2 ]
Remmers, Sebastiaan [8 ]
Roobol, Monique J. [8 ]
van Leeuwen, Pim J. [1 ,2 ]
van der Poel, Henk G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp NCI AVL, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Urol, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Prostate Canc Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Locat VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Noordwest Ziekenhuisgrp, Dept Urol, Alkmaar, Netherlands
[5] Spaarne Gasthuis, Dept Urol, Hoofddorp, Netherlands
[6] Hosp St Jansdal, Dept Urol, Harderwijk, Netherlands
[7] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp NCI, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Stat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Urol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Prostate cancer; Prostate biopsies; MRI; Risk stratification; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTION; GUIDELINES; BIOPSY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-022-04185-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose This study aims to externally validate the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator (RPCRC)-3/4 and RPCRC-MRI within a Dutch clinical cohort. Methods Men subjected to prostate biopsies, between 2018 and 2021, due to a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) were retrospectively included. The performance of the RPCRC-3/4 and RPCRC-MRI was analyzed in terms of discrimination, calibration and net benefit. In addition, the need for recalibration and adjustment of risk thresholds for referral was investigated. Clinically significant (cs) PCa was defined as Gleason score >= 3 + 4. Results A total of 1575 men were included in the analysis. PCa was diagnosed in 63.2% (996/1575) of men and csPCa in 41.7% (656/1575) of men. Use of the RPCRC-3/4 could have prevented 37.3% (587/1575) of all MRIs within this cohort, thereby missing 18.3% (120/656) of csPCa diagnoses. After recalibration and adjustment of risk thresholds to 20% for PCa and 10% for csPCa, use of the recalibrated RPCRC-3/4 could have prevented 15.1% (238/1575) of all MRIs, resulting in 5.3% (35/656) of csPCa diagnoses being missed. The performance of the RPCRC-MRI was good; use of this risk calculator could have prevented 10.7% (169/1575) of all biopsies, resulting in 1.2% (8/656) of csPCa diagnoses being missed. Conclusion The RPCRC-3/4 underestimates the probability of having csPCa within this Dutch clinical cohort, resulting in significant numbers of csPCa diagnoses being missed. For optimal performance of a risk calculator in a specific cohort, evaluation of its performance within the population under study is essential.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 18
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] When to order genomic tests: development and external validation of a model to predict high-risk prostate cancer at the genotypic level
    Ugo Giovanni Falagario
    Dimple Chakravarty
    Alberto Martini
    Mohammed Shahait
    Ayah El-Fahmawi
    Ivan Jambor
    Anna Lantz
    David Grannas
    Parita Ratnani
    Sneha Parekh
    Dara Lundon
    Kenneth Haines
    Luigi Cormio
    Giuseppe Carrieri
    Natasha Kyprianou
    Michael W. Kattan
    Eric A. Klein
    Peter Wiklund
    David I. Lee
    Ash Tewari
    World Journal of Urology, 2023, 41 : 85 - 92
  • [22] Predicting contralateral extraprostatic extension in unilateral high-risk prostate cancer: a multicentric external validation study
    Diamand, Romain
    Roche, Jean-Baptiste
    Lacetera, Vito
    Simone, Giuseppe
    Windisch, Olivier
    Benamran, Daniel
    Fourcade, Alexandre
    Fournier, Georges
    Fiard, Gaelle
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Roumeguere, Thierry
    Peltier, Alexandre
    Albisinni, Simone
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [23] Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators
    Alberts, Arnout R.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Verbeek, Jan F. M.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Chiu, Peter K.
    Osses, Daniel F.
    Tijsterman, Jasper D.
    Beerlage, Harrie P.
    Mannaerts, Christophe K.
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    Albers, Peter
    Arsov, Christian
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (02) : 310 - 318
  • [24] Reducing Biopsies and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans During the Diagnostic Pathway of Prostate Cancer: Applying the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator to the PRECISION Trial Data
    Remmers, Sebastiaan
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Verbeek, Jan F. M.
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 36 : 1 - 8
  • [25] Dose escalation of external beam radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer-Impact of multiple high-risk factor
    Umezawa, Rei
    Inaba, Koji
    Nakamura, Satoshi
    Wakita, Akihisa
    Okamoto, Hiroyuki
    Tsuchida, Keisuke
    Kashihara, Tairo
    Kobayashi, Kazuma
    Harada, Ken
    Takahashi, Kana
    Murakami, Naoya
    Ito, Yoshinori
    Igaki, Hiroshi
    Jingu, Keiichi
    Itami, Jun
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 6 (02) : 192 - 199
  • [26] Patterns of Clinical Progression in Radiorecurrent High-risk Prostate Cancer
    Philipson, Rebecca G.
    Romero, Tahmineh
    Wong, Jessica K.
    Stish, Bradley J.
    Dess, Robert T.
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    Pilar, Avinash
    Reddy, Chandana
    Wedde, Trude B.
    Lilleby, Wolfgang A.
    Fiano, Ryan
    Merrick, Gregory S.
    Stock, Richard G.
    Demanes, D. Jeffrey
    Moran, Brian J.
    Braccioforte, Michelle
    Tran, Phuoc T.
    Martin, Santiago
    Martinez-Monge, Rafael
    Krauss, Daniel J.
    Abu-Isa, Eyad I.
    Valle, Luca
    Chong, Natalie
    Pisansky, Thomas M.
    Choo, C. Richard
    Song, Daniel Y.
    Greco, Stephen
    Deville, Curtiland
    McNutt, Todd
    DeWeese, Theodore L.
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Ciezki, Jay P.
    Tilki, Derya
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Klein, Eric A.
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Boutros, Paul C.
    Nickols, Nicholas G.
    Bhat, Prashant
    Shabsovich, David
    Juarez, Jesus E.
    Kupelian, Patrick A.
    Rettig, Matthew B.
    Berlin, Alejandro
    Tward, Jonathan D.
    Davis, Brian J.
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Steinberg, Michael L.
    Elashoff, David
    Horwitz, Eric M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 80 (02) : 142 - 146
  • [27] Challenges in clinical trials for high-risk but curable prostate cancer
    Dorff, Tanya Barauskas
    Bryce, Alan H.
    CANCER, 2024, 130 (09) : 1575 - 1576
  • [28] The Use of the Finasteride-Adjusted Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in a Mexican Referral Population: A Validation Study
    Liang, Yuanyuan
    Ketchum, Norma S.
    Louden, Christopher
    Jimenez-Rios, Miguel A.
    Thompson, Ian M.
    Camarena-Reynoso, Hector R.
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2012, 89 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [29] Comparing the prediction of prostate biopsy outcome using the Chinese Prostate Cancer Consortium (CPCC) Risk Calculator and the Asian adapted Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Risk Calculator in Chinese and European men
    Chen, Rui
    Verbeek, Jan F. M.
    Yang, Yue
    Song, Zijian
    Sun, Yinghao
    Roobol, Monique J.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (01) : 73 - 80
  • [30] Comparing the prediction of prostate biopsy outcome using the Chinese Prostate Cancer Consortium (CPCC) Risk Calculator and the Asian adapted Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Risk Calculator in Chinese and European men
    Rui Chen
    Jan F. M. Verbeek
    Yue Yang
    Zijian Song
    Yinghao Sun
    Monique J. Roobol
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 73 - 80