TMB and BRAF mutation status are independent predictive factors in high-risk melanoma patients with adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy

被引:10
作者
Eckardt, Julia [1 ,5 ]
Schroeder, Christopher [3 ]
Martus, Peter [2 ]
Armeanu-Ebinger, Sorin [3 ]
Kelemen, Olga [3 ]
Gschwind, Axel [3 ]
Bonzheim, Irina [4 ]
Eigentler, Thomas [5 ]
Amaral, Teresa [1 ]
Ossowski, Stephan [3 ]
Riess, Olaf [3 ]
Flatz, Lukas [1 ]
Garbe, Claus [1 ]
Forschner, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Dermatol, Liebermeisterstr 25, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Inst Clin Epidemiol & Appl Biometr, Silcherstr 5, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Inst Med Genet & Appl Genom, Calwerstr 7, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Inst Pathol & Neuropathol, Liebermeisterstr 8, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[5] Charite, Dept Dermatol, Luisenstr 2, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Anti-PD-1; Adjuvant; Melanoma; Checkpoint inhibition; Tumor mutational burden; RFS; DABRAFENIB PLUS TRAMETINIB; RESECTED STAGE IIIB; PROGNOSTIC-FACTOR; DOUBLE-BLIND; IV MELANOMA; NIVOLUMAB; IPILIMUMAB; SURVIVAL; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.1007/s00432-022-03939-w
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background High tumor mutational burden (TMB) is associated with a favorable outcome in metastatic melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, data are limited in the adjuvant setting. As BRAF mutated patients have an alternative with targeted adjuvant therapy, it is important to identify predictive factors for relapse and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients receiving adjuvant anti-PD-1 antibodies. Methods We evaluated 165 melanoma patients who started adjuvant anti-PD-1 antibody therapy at our center between March 2018 and September 2019. The initial tumor stage was assessed at the beginning of therapy according to the 8th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. Tumor and normal tissue of the high-risk stages IIIC/D/IV were sequenced using a 700 gene NGS panel. Results The tumor stages at the beginning of adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy were as follows: N = 80 stage IIIA/B (48%), N = 85 stage IIIC/D/IV (52%). 72/165 patients (44%) suffered a relapse, 44/72 (61%) with only loco regional and 28/72 (39%) with distant metastases. Sequencing results were available from 83 to 85 patients with stage IIIC/D/IV. BRAF mutation status (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.12-4.08; p = 0.022) and TMB (HR 7.11, 95% CI 2.19-23.11; p = 0.001) were significant and independent predictive factors for relapse-free survival (RFS). Conclusion BRAF mutation status and TMB were independent predictive factors for RFS. Patients with BRAF V600E/K mutation and TMB high had the best outcome. A classification based on BRAF mutation status and TMB is proposed to predict RFS in melanoma patients with adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 840
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] Strelka2: fast and accurate calling of germline and somatic variants
    Kim, Sangtae
    Scheffler, Konrad
    Halpern, Aaron L.
    Bekritsky, Mitchell A.
    Noh, Eunho
    Kallberg, Morten
    Chen, Xiaoyu
    Kim, Yeonbin
    Beyter, Doruk
    Krusche, Peter
    Saunders, Christopher T.
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2018, 15 (08) : 591 - +
  • [22] Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft Deutsche Krebshilfe AWMF), 2020, DTSCH KREBSG DTSCH K
  • [23] Li H, 2009, BIOINFORMATICS, V25, P1094, DOI [10.1093/bioinformatics/btp100, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324]
  • [24] Adjuvant Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Stage III BRAF-Mutated Melanoma
    Long, G. V.
    Hauschild, A.
    Santinami, M.
    Atkinson, V.
    Mandala, M.
    Chiarion-Sileni, V.
    Larkin, J.
    Nyakas, M.
    Dutriaux, C.
    Haydon, A.
    Robert, C.
    Mortier, L.
    Schachter, J.
    Schadendorf, D.
    Lesimple, T.
    Plummer, R.
    Ji, R.
    Zhang, P.
    Mookerjee, B.
    Legos, J.
    Kefford, R.
    Dummer, R.
    Kirkwood, J. M.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (19) : 1813 - 1823
  • [25] Prognostic and Clinicopathologic Associations of Oncogenic BRAF in Metastatic Melanoma
    Long, Georgina V.
    Menzies, Alexander M.
    Nagrial, Adnan M.
    Haydu, Lauren E.
    Hamilton, Anne L.
    Mann, Graham J.
    Hughes, T. Michael
    Thompson, John F.
    Scolyer, Richard A.
    Kefford, Richard F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (10) : 1239 - 1246
  • [26] The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor
    McLaren, William
    Gil, Laurent
    Hunt, Sarah E.
    Riat, Harpreet Singh
    Ritchie, Graham R. S.
    Thormann, Anja
    Flicek, Paul
    Cunningham, Fiona
    [J]. GENOME BIOLOGY, 2016, 17
  • [27] BRAF-V600 Mutations Have No Prognostic Impact in Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated with Monochemotherapy
    Meckbach, Diana
    Keim, Ulrike
    Richter, Sabina
    Leiter, Ulrike
    Eigentler, Thomas K.
    Bauer, Juergen
    Pflugfelder, Annette
    Buettner, Petra
    Garbe, Claus
    Weide, Benjamin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02):
  • [28] Prognostic Value of BRAF V600 Mutations in Melanoma Patients After Resection of Metastatic Lymph Nodes
    Moreau, Stephanie
    Saiag, Philippe
    Aegerter, Philippe
    Bosset, Daphne
    Longvert, Christine
    Helias-Rodzewicz, Zofia
    Marin, Cristi
    Peschaud, Frederique
    Chagnon, Sophie
    Zimmermann, Utte
    Clerici, Thierry
    Emile, Jean-Francois
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (13) : 4314 - 4321
  • [29] Tumor Mutation Burden and Efficacy of EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancers
    Offin, Michael
    Rizvi, Hira
    Tenet, Megan
    Ni, Andy
    Sanchez-Vega, Francisco
    Li, Bob T.
    Drilon, Alexander
    Kris, Mark G.
    Rudin, Charles M.
    Schultz, Nikolaus
    Arcila, Maria E.
    Ladanyi, Marc
    Riely, Gregory J.
    Yu, Helena
    Hellmann, Matthew D.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 25 (03) : 1063 - 1069
  • [30] Is BRAF a prognostic factor in stage III skin melanoma? A retrospective study of 72 patients after positive sentinel lymph node dissection
    Picard, M.
    Dang, N. Pham
    D'Incan, M.
    Mansard, S.
    Dechelotte, P.
    Pereira, B.
    Mondie, J. M.
    Barthelemy, I.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2014, 171 (01) : 108 - 114