Factors That Affect Drivers' Perception of Closing and an Immediate Hazard

被引:4
|
作者
Weaver, Bradley W. [1 ]
DeLucia, Patricia R. [2 ]
Jupe, Jason [3 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Human Factors & Human Comp Interact Program, Houston, TX USA
[2] Rice Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, MS 25,6100 Main St, Houston, TX 77005 USA
[3] Rimkus Consulting Grp Inc, Houston, TX USA
关键词
driver behavior; perception-action; driver distraction; accident analysis; threshold; EFFECT SIZE; CELL PHONE; ATTENTION; CONSEQUENCES; STATISTICS; VARIANCE; CARS;
D O I
10.1177/00187208211009028
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective To measure the looming threshold for when drivers perceive closing and an immediate hazard and determine what factors affect these thresholds. Background Rear-end collisions are a common type of crash. One key issue is determining when drivers first perceive they need to react. The looming threshold for closing and an immediate hazard are critical perceptual thresholds that reflect when drivers perceive they need to react. Method Two driving simulator experiments examined whether engaging in a cell phone conversation and whether the complexity of the roadway environment affect these thresholds for the perception of closing and immediate hazard. Half of the participants engaged in a cognitive task, the last letter task, to emulate a cell phone conversation, and all participants experienced both simple and complex roadway environments. Results Drivers perceived an immediate hazard later when engaged in a cell phone conversation than when not engaged in a conversation but only when the driving task was relatively less demanding (e.g., simple roadway, slow closing velocity). Compared to simple scenes, drivers perceived closing and an immediate hazard later for complex scenes but only when closing velocity was 30 mph (48.28 km/h) or greater. Conclusion Cell phone conversation can affect when drivers perceive an immediate hazard when the roadway is less demanding. Roadway complexity can affect when drivers perceive closing and an immediate hazard when closing velocity is high. Application Results can aid accident analysis cases and the design of driving automation systems by suggesting when a typical driver would respond.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 181
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The development of hazard perception: Dissociation of visual orientation and hazard processing
    Huestegge, Lynn
    Skottke, Eva-Maria
    Anders, Sina
    Muesseler, Jochen
    Debus, Guenter
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2010, 13 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [22] A Study on a Method to Call Drivers' Attention to Hazard
    Takahashi, Hiroshi
    ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5639 : 441 - 450
  • [23] Effectiveness of visual warnings on young drivers hazard anticipation and hazard mitigation abilities
    Hajiseyedjavadi, Foroogh
    Zhang, Tingru
    Agrawal, Ravi
    Knodler, Michael
    Fisher, Donald
    Samuel, Siby
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2018, 116 : 41 - 52
  • [24] Effects of roadside memorials on drivers' risk perception and eye movements
    Beanland, Vanessa
    Wynne, Rachael A.
    COGNITIVE RESEARCH-PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS, 2019, 4 (01)
  • [25] Text messaging amongst New Zealand drivers: Prevalence and risk perception
    Hallett, Charlene
    Lambert, Anthony
    Regan, Michael A.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2012, 15 (03) : 261 - 271
  • [26] Watch out for the hazard! Blurring peripheral vision facilitates hazard perception in driving
    Ryu, Donghyun
    Cooke, Andrew
    Bellomo, Eduardo
    Woodman, Tim
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2020, 146
  • [27] Human Factors Concerns: Drivers' Perception on Electronic Sideview System in 21st Century Cars
    Fasanya, Bankole K.
    Avula, Yashwant
    Keshavula, Swetha
    Aragattu, Supraja
    Kurra, Sivaramakrishna
    Kummari, Bharath
    ADVANCES IN HUMAN FACTORS OF TRANSPORTATION, 2020, 964 : 556 - 563
  • [28] A novel driving assessment combining hazard perception, hazard prediction and theory questions
    Crundall, David
    van Loon, Editha
    Baguley, Thom
    Kroll, Victoria
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2021, 149
  • [29] Does preoccupation impair hazard perception? A simultaneous EEG and Eye Tracking study
    Savage, Steven W.
    Potter, Douglas D.
    Tatler, Benjamin W.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2013, 17 : 52 - 62
  • [30] Brief Report: Driving Hazard Perception in Autism
    Sheppard, Elizabeth
    Ropar, Danielle
    Underwood, Geoffrey
    van Loon, Editha
    JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2010, 40 (04) : 504 - 508