Trauma surgical simulation: discussing the replacement of live animals used as human patient simulators

被引:4
作者
Swain, Cara [1 ,2 ]
Stathakarou, Natalia [1 ]
Alzuguren, Pilar [3 ]
Lemarteleur, Vincent [4 ]
Moffatt, Ryan [5 ]
Karlgren, Klas [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Learning Informat Management & Eth LIME, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Royal Ctr Def Med RCDM, Acad Dept Mil Surg & Trauma, Birmingham, England
[3] Univ Navarra, Sch Med, Med Engn Lab, Pamplona, Spain
[4] Univ Paris Cite, Healthcare Simulat Dept, Unite Rech Biomat Innovants & Interfaces URB2i, Paris, France
[5] Northern Ireland Med & Dent Training Agcy, Belfast, North Ireland
[6] Soder Sjukhuset, Dept Res Educ Dev & Innovat, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Bergen, Norway
关键词
Simulation; Trauma; Surgery; Live animal; Debate; Discussion; TISSUE; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1186/s41077-024-00279-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundDespite advances in simulator technology, live anaesthetised animals continue to be used as human patient simulators for medical professionals to practice techniques in the management of surgical trauma. This article describes the process of convening a working group of individuals with a professional interest in simulation to discuss the use of live animals and consider if and how they can be replaced in the future.Main bodyA working group was formed of voluntary attendees to a workshop held at the SESAM 2023 conference. Iterative discussions reflecting on the topic were used to produce statements summarising the working group's opinions. The working group determined that live animals are used as human patient simulators due to the presence of accurate and responsive physiology in the presence of bleeding, realistic tissue tactility and an emotional response experienced by the learner due to interaction with the animal. They were unable to reach a consensus on replacement, determining that there is currently no single model which is able to provide all the learning aspects which a live animal model can provide. Several suggestions were made regarding development of technologies and pedagogical change.ConclusionReplacement of live animals in surgical simulation is not straightforward but should be an aspiration, if possible. For the ongoing development of trauma surgical simulation models, it is important to combine the knowledge, skills and perspectives of medical stakeholders and educators, academic researchers and industry experts in producing alternative options to the use of live animal simulators.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Training and simulation for patient safety
    Aggarwal, Rajesh
    Mytton, Oliver T.
    Derbrew, Milliard
    Hananel, David
    Heydenburg, Mark
    Issenberg, Barry
    MacAulay, Catherine
    Mancini, Mary Elizabeth
    Morimoto, Takeshi
    Soper, Nathaniel
    Ziv, Amitai
    Reznick, Richard
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 19 : i34 - 43
  • [2] Innovations in surgery simulation: a review of past, current and future techniques
    Badash, Ido
    Burtt, Karen
    Solorzano, Carlos A.
    Carey, Joseph N.
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (23)
  • [3] The European Citizens' Stop Vivisection Initiative
    Balls, Michael
    [J]. ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2015, 43 (03): : 147 - 150
  • [4] Simulating Surgical Skills in Animals: Systematic Review, Costs & Acceptance Analyses
    Bergmeister, Konstantin D.
    Aman, Martin
    Kramer, Anne
    Schenck, Thilo L.
    Riedl, Otto
    Daeschler, Simeon C.
    Aszmann, Oskar C.
    Bergmeister, Helga
    Golriz, Mohammad
    Mehrabi, Arianeb
    Hundeshagen, Gabriel
    Enkhbaatar, Perenlei
    Kinsky, Michael P.
    Podesser, Bruno K.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2020, 7
  • [5] Procedural training models among emergency medicine residency programs
    Bilello, Leslie
    Ketterer, Andrew
    Yarza, Shaked
    Chiu, David
    Rosen, Carlo
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 8 (01): : 37 - 42
  • [6] Bowyer M.W., 2019, Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Surgery and Surgical Subspecialties, P171
  • [7] Perceptions of Simulator- and Live Tissue-Based Combat Casualty Care Training of Senior Special Operations Medics
    Bukoski, Alex
    Uhlich, Rindi
    Bowling, F.
    Shapiro, Mark
    Kerby, Jeffrey D.
    Llerena, Luis
    Armstrong, John H.
    Strayhorn, Catherine
    Barnes, Stephen L.
    [J]. MILITARY MEDICINE, 2018, 183 : 78 - 85
  • [8] Choi W., 2017, Engagement and learning in simulation: recommendations of the Simnovate Engaged Learning Domain Group
  • [9] Embodied aspects of learning to be a surgeon
    Cooper, Amanda B.
    Tisdell, Elizabeth J.
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2020, 42 (05) : 515 - 522
  • [10] Making Meaning From Sensory Cues: A Qualitative Investigation of Postgraduate Learning in the Operating Room
    Cope, Alexandra C.
    Mavroveli, Stella
    Bezemer, Jeff
    Hanna, George B.
    Kneebone, Roger
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2015, 90 (08) : 1125 - 1131