Does Bitcoin affect decomposed oil shocks differently? Evidence from a quantile-based framework

被引:10
|
作者
Feng, Hao [1 ]
Gao, Da [2 ]
Duan, Kun [1 ]
Urquhart, Andrew [3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Inst Technol, Sch Law & Business, Wuhan 430205, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Reading, ICMA Ctr, Henley Business Sch, Reading RG6 6BA, England
关键词
Bitcoin; Decomposed oil shocks; Investment shelter; Causality-in-quantiles; Quantiles-on-quantiles; POLICY UNCERTAINTY PREDICT; SAFE HAVEN PROPERTIES; VOLATILITY EVIDENCE; PRICE SHOCKS; HEDGE; GOLD; CAUSALITY; RETURNS; EXCHANGE; INVESTMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102756
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper studies the impact of Bitcoin on decomposed oil price shocks within a quantile-based framework, through which the underlying investment sheltering role of Bitcoin for various oil price fluctuations is explored. The aggregate oil price shock is decomposed into three perspectives of the demand, the supply, and the changing attitudes towards risk. A comparison of the sheltering role between Bitcoin and gold is further evaluated. By using a non-parametric causality test, we find that there exists an asymmetric and unidirectional causal relationship from Bitcoin/gold to oil shocks. Such the unidirectional causality appears only to the demand and supply shocks of oil instead of the risk-specific shocks, and is more evident at median quantiles. By jointly considering the data distribution of both dependent and independent variables realized by a quantiles-on-quantiles method, both Bitcoin and gold generally depict the hedge and safe haven abilities for oil shocks, and such the ability is shown to be different not only between Bitcoin and gold but also for various sources of oil shocks. The sheltering role of gold is found to be greater than that of Bitcoin for the supply shock, while the results reverse for the demand shock. Moreover, shocks from the identified shocks from the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine conflict are found to not change the cross-market relationship. A series of robustness checks confirm our findings that possess important implications for various stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Oil price shocks and exchange rate dynamics: Evidence from decomposed and partial connectedness measures for oil importing and exporting economies
    Chatziantoniou, Ioannis
    Elsayed, Ahmed H.
    Gabauer, David
    Gozgor, Giray
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 120
  • [22] Does investor sentiment differently affect stocks in different sectors? Evidence from China
    Niu, Hongli
    Lu, Yao
    Wang, Weiqing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2023, 18 (09) : 3224 - 3244
  • [23] How oil price shocks affect investor sentiment: new evidence from China
    Li, Peng
    Ouyang, Yaofu
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2022, 29 (07) : 584 - 592
  • [24] Extreme time-varying spillovers between high carbon emission stocks, green bond and crude oil: Evidence from a quantile-based analysis
    Dai, Zhifeng
    Zhang, Xiaotong
    Yin, Zhujia
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 118
  • [25] Does Economic Policy Uncertainty Affect Green Bond Markets? Evidence from Wavelet-Based Quantile Analysis
    Wei, Ping
    Qi, Yinshu
    Ren, Xiaohang
    Duan, Kun
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2022, 58 (15) : 4375 - 4388
  • [26] Asymmetry and determinants of financial connectivity in G20: Evidence from a quantile-based and lasso regression analysis
    Yang, Guangyi
    Li, Yong
    Liu, Xiaoxing
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2025, 77
  • [27] Extreme spillovers among fossil energy, clean energy, and metals markets: Evidence from a quantile-based analysis
    Chen, Jinyu
    Liang, Zhipeng
    Ding, Qian
    Liu, Zhenhua
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 107
  • [29] Does fertility affect growth? Evidence and simulation results from alternative quantile regression estimators
    Marques, Andre M.
    EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2025,
  • [30] Does natural gas volatility affect Bitcoin volatility? Evidence from the HAR-RV model
    Omura, Akihiro
    Cheung, Adrian
    Su, Jen Je
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024, 56 (04) : 414 - 425