Thermo-economic performance comparison and advanced analysis using orthogonal experiment for organic Rankine cycle

被引:3
作者
Xia, Xiaoxia [1 ]
Liu, Zhipeng [1 ]
Wang, Zhiqi [1 ]
Sun, Tong [1 ]
Zhang, Hualong [1 ]
机构
[1] Xiangtan Univ, Sch Mech Engn & Mech, Xiangtan 411105, Peoples R China
关键词
WASTE HEAT-RECOVERY; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; ORC SYSTEM; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; WORKING FLUID; EVAPORATION; PARAMETERS; SIMULATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1063/5.0128557
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To improve the thermo-economic performance of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems, a multi-level analysis method is proposed in this study. In the first level, the optimal configuration is determined based on the thermo-economic optimization. The exergy efficiency and electricity production cost are selected as the objective functions of optimization for three ORC configurations, including simple ORC, TORC (two-stage ORC), and DORC (dual-loop ORC). In the second level, the real potential of performance improvement for the optimal configuration is revealed through advanced exergy analysis method. Finally, the order of operating parameters to different performance indicators of the optimal configuration is determined by orthogonal experiment method. The results show that the TORC system exhibits better thermo-economic performance. Although the low-temperature condenser in the TORC system has the highest exergy destruction, the LTT (low-temperature turbine) contributes the largest avoidable-endogenous exergy destruction. Thus, the LTT has the greatest potential for technical improvement. The condensation temperature and pinch point temperature difference in the low-temperature evaporator are the primary factors for the thermodynamic and economic performance of the TORC system, respectively. While the evaporation temperature of the high-temperature evaporator has the greatest effect on the potential of technical improvement for the LTT.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Applications of geothermal organic Rankine Cycle for electricity production [J].
Ahmadi, A. ;
Assad, M. El Haj ;
Jamali, D. H. ;
Kumar, R. ;
Li, Z. X. ;
Salameh, T. ;
Al-Shabi, M. ;
Ehyae, M. A. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 274
[2]  
Briggs D.E., 1963, Chemical Engineering Progress Symposium Series, V59, P1
[3]   A novel cascade organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system for waste heat recovery of truck diesel engines [J].
Chen, Tao ;
Zhuge, Weilin ;
Zhang, Yangjun ;
Zhang, Lei .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 138 :210-223
[4]  
Dittus FW., 1930, U CALIF BERKELEY PUB, V2, P443, DOI DOI 10.1016/0735-1933(85)90003-X
[5]   Sensitivity analysis and thermoeconomic comparison of ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) for low temperature waste heat recovery [J].
Feng, Yongqiang ;
Zhang, Yaning ;
Li, Bingxi ;
Yang, Jinfu ;
Shi, Yang .
ENERGY, 2015, 82 :664-677
[6]   Advanced exergy analysis for a bottoming organic rankine cycle coupled to an internal combustion engine [J].
Galindo, J. ;
Ruiz, S. ;
Dolz, V. ;
Royo-Pascual, L. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 126 :217-227
[7]  
GNIELINSKI V, 1976, INT CHEM ENG, V16, P359
[8]   The comparision of a basic and a dual-pressure ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle): Geothermal Power Plant Velika Ciglena case study [J].
Guzovic, Zvonimir ;
Raskovic, Predrag ;
Blataric, Zoran .
ENERGY, 2014, 76 :175-186
[9]   Influence of exhaust heat distribution on the performance of dual-loop organic Rankine Cycles (DORC) for engine waste heat recovery [J].
Huang, Haozhong ;
Zhu, Juan ;
Deng, Wei ;
Ouyang, Tiancheng ;
Yan, Bo ;
Yang, Xu .
ENERGY, 2018, 151 :54-65
[10]   Multi-objective optimization of evaporator of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for low temperature geothermal heat source [J].
Imran, Muhammad ;
Usman, Muhammad ;
Park, Byung-Sik ;
Kim, Hyouck-Ju ;
Lee, Dong-Hyun .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 80 :1-9