Benefits of Decision Support Systems in Relation to Task Difficulty in Airport Security X-Ray Screening

被引:7
作者
Huegli, David [1 ]
Merks, Sarah [2 ]
Schwaninger, Adrian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Sch Appl Psychol, Inst Humans Complex Syst, Olten, Switzerland
[2] Ctr Adapt Secur Res & Applicat CASRA, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
THREAT DETECTION PERFORMANCE; AUTOMATION RELIABILITY; TRUST; BIAS; RELIANCE; MODEL; SEARCH; ALARMS; CAD; COMPLACENCY;
D O I
10.1080/10447318.2022.2107775
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Automated explosive detection systems for cabin baggage screening (EDSCB) highlight areas in X-ray images of passenger bags that could contain explosive material. Several countries have implemented EDSCB so that passengers can leave personal electronic devices in their cabin baggage. This increases checkpoint efficiency, but also task difficulty for screeners. We used this case to investigate whether the benefits of decision support systems depend on task difficulty. 100 professional screeners conducted a simulated baggage screening task. They had to detect prohibited articles built into personal electronic devices that were screened either separately (low task difficulty) or inside baggage (high task difficulty). Results showed that EDSCB increased the detection of bombs built into personal electronic devices when screened separately. When electronics were left inside the baggage, operators ignored many EDSCB alarms, and many bombs were missed. Moreover, screeners missed most unalarmed explosives because they over-relied on the EDSCB's judgment. We recommend that when EDSCB indicates that the bag might contain an explosive, baggage should always be examined further in a secondary search using explosive trace detection, manual opening of bags and other means.
引用
收藏
页码:3830 / 3845
页数:16
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Effects of incorrect computer-aided detection (CAD) output on human decision-making in mammography [J].
Alberdi, E ;
Povyakalo, A ;
Strigini, L ;
Ayton, P .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2004, 11 (08) :909-918
[2]   CAD in mammography: lesion-level versus case-level analysis of the effects of prompts on human decisions [J].
Alberdi, Eugenio ;
Povyakalo, Andrey A. ;
Strigini, Lorenzo ;
Ayton, Peter ;
Given-Wilson, Rosalind .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2008, 3 (1-2) :115-122
[3]  
[Anonymous], CRY WOLF PSYCHOL FAL
[4]   Automation Type and Reliability Impact on Visual Automation Monitoring and Human Performance [J].
Avril, Eugenie ;
Cegarra, Julien ;
Wioland, Lien ;
Navarro, Jordan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2022, 38 (01) :64-77
[5]   Effect of Imperfect Information and Action Automation on Attentional Allocation [J].
Avril, Eugenie ;
Valery, Benoit ;
Navarro, Jordan ;
Wioland, Lien ;
Cegarra, Julien .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2021, 37 (11) :1063-1073
[6]   Automation-induced complacency for monitoring highly reliable systems: the role of task complexity, system experience, and operator trust [J].
Bailey, N. R. ;
Scerbo, M. W. .
THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2007, 8 (04) :321-348
[7]   IRONIES OF AUTOMATION [J].
BAINBRIDGE, L .
AUTOMATICA, 1983, 19 (06) :775-779
[8]   No Effect of Cue Format on Automation Dependence in an Aided Signal Detection Task [J].
Bartlett, Megan L. ;
McCarley, Jason S. .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2019, 61 (02) :169-190
[9]   Benchmarking Aided Decision Making in a Signal Detection Task [J].
Bartlett, Megan L. ;
McCarley, Jason S. .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2017, 59 (06) :881-900
[10]   The influence of task load and automation trust on deception detection [J].
Biros, DP ;
Daly, M ;
Gunsch, G .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2004, 13 (02) :173-189