Comparative Analysis of Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Combined with Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy versus Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy Alone for Treating Complex Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study of 205 Patients

被引:5
|
作者
Ding, Qi [1 ]
Zhu, Hailiang [1 ]
Fan, Zhijiang [1 ]
Li, Feng [1 ]
Tu, Wenjian [1 ]
Jin, Xiaohua [1 ]
Fan, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Changshu Hosp, Peoples Hosp Changshu 1, Dept Urol, Changshu, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2023年 / 29卷
关键词
Endoscopes; Nephrolithiasis; Nephrolithotomy; Percutaneous; Ureteroscopes; RENAL-CALCULI; SINGLE-TRACT; URETERORENOSCOPY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.941012
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: This retrospective study aimed to compare outcomes from super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) combined with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) and FURL alone in 205 patients with 2.5-4.2 cm diameter complex kidney stones.Material/Methods: Between January 2018 and December 2022, 92 patients were treated with SMP combined with FURL (group A), and 113 patients were treated with FURL alone (group B). The stone-free rate (SFR), retreatment ratio, operation time, mean decline in hemoglobin level, postoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS), and postoperative hospitalization time and complications were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups.Results: The SFR 3 days after the operation was 85.87% in group A, which was significantly higher than that in group B (72.57%) (P=0.021). The rate of retreatment in group A (3.26%) was significantly lower than that in group B (10.62%) (P=0.044). The SFR after 90 days was higher in group A (94.57%) than in group B (90.27%) (P=0.254). The mean decrease in hemoglobin, postoperative hospitalization duration, and VAS score 6 hours after the operation were all significantly higher in group A than in group B (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in operation time, VAS score at 12 and 24 hours after the operation, and complication rate.Conclusions: In the treatment of complex renal stones, compared with FURL, SMP combined with FURL in the oblique supine lithotomy position has the advantages of a higher early SFR with no increased risk of complications.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] Treatment of Complex Renal Calculi by Digital Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Combined with Single-Tract Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Prone Position: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Gao, Huayu
    Zhang, Hui
    Wang, Yunchao
    Li, Kai
    Du, Wenzhi
    Wang, Xiangyu
    Wang, Jianning
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2019, 25 : 5878 - 5885
  • [22] Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscopy Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Patients with Kidney Stones and Their Impact on Inflammatory Response and Renal Function
    Wang, Jianhua
    Wang, Yang
    Yin, Jie
    Xia, Lei
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2024, 95 (02) : 220 - 226
  • [23] Impact of Preoperative Video- Based Education on Anxiety Levels in Patients with Renal Stones Scheduled for Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: A Comparative Study Using APAIS and STAI
    Karalar, Mustafa
    Demirbas, Arif
    Gercek, Osman
    Topal, Kutay
    Keles, Ibrahim
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2023, 29
  • [24] Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy alone versus in combination with intraoperative anterograde flexible nephroscopy for staghorn stones: A retrospective study
    Goktug, Goksel
    Karakoyunlu, Nihat
    Sener, Nevzat Can
    Zengin, Kursad
    Nalbant, Ismail
    Karabacak, Osman
    Ozturk, Ufuk
    Imamoglu, Abdurrahim
    KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 31 (11) : 568 - 571
  • [25] Lower calyceal and renal pelvic stones in preschool children: A comparative study of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
    ElSheemy, Mohammed S.
    Daw, Kareem
    Habib, Enmar
    Aboulela, Waseem
    Fathy, Hesham
    Shouman, Ahmed M.
    El Ghoneimy, Mohamed
    Shoukry, Ahmed I.
    Morsi, Hany A.
    Badawy, Hesham
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 (07) : 564 - 570
  • [26] Comparative study between ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus stented extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of renal stones in Egypt
    Radwan, Ahmed Ibrahim
    Saif, Ahmed Mohsen Ibrahim
    Samir, Younan Ramsis
    Maged, Wael Ali
    Gamal, Mohamed A.
    ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 21 (04) : 273 - 279
  • [27] Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10-20-mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit: a comparative study
    Zhou, Chuanzhi
    Yin, Guangming
    Jiang, Zhiqiang
    Tan, Jing
    Huang, Kai
    Yuan, Peng
    MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 75 (05): : 616 - 624
  • [28] Comparative Study of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy versus Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Nonlower Calyceal 10-20 mm Size Kidney Stone
    Roy, Pinaki
    Sarkar, Debansu
    Jalan, Vishal
    Pal, Dilip Kumar
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 32 (02) : 83 - 88
  • [29] Flexible Ureterorenoscopy versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the treatment of upper/middle calyx kidney stones of 10-20 mm: a retrospective analysis of 174 patients
    Cecen, Kursat
    Karadag, Mert Ali
    Demir, Aslan
    Bagcioglu, Murat
    Kocaaslan, Ramazan
    Sofikerim, Mustafa
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2014, 3 : 1 - 5
  • [30] Retrospective study of visualized ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy vs. flexible ureterorenoscopy for nephrolithiasis patients with 1.5-2.5 cm kidney stones and without hydronephrosis
    Li, Z.
    Zhongying, Y.
    Hui, L.
    Hanrong, Z.
    Qinghe, G.
    Yuehong, Z.
    Jinyu, L.
    Meihong, L.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 26 (09) : 3185 - 3191