Variability of groundwater fluoride and its proportionate risk quantification via Monte Carlo simulation in rural and urban areas of Agra district, India

被引:11
作者
Ali, Shahjad [1 ]
Agarwal, Manish Baboo [1 ]
Verma, Sitaram [2 ]
Islam, Raisul [3 ]
Deolia, Rajesh Kumar [4 ]
Singh, Shailendra [5 ]
Kumar, Jitendra [6 ]
Mohammadi, Ali Akbar [7 ]
Gupta, Manoj Kumar [8 ]
Fattahi, Mehdi [9 ,10 ]
Nguyen, P. U. [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Anand Engn Coll, Dept Appl Sci, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] IIT ISM, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Dhanbad, Bihar, India
[3] GLA Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Mathura, India
[4] GL Bajaj Grp Inst, Dept Appl Sci Mathemet, Mathura, India
[5] Anand Engn Coll, Dept Mech Engn, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India
[6] Madhav Inst Technol Sci, Dept Math & Comp, Gwalior, India
[7] Neyshabur Univ Med Sci, Dept Environm Hlth Engn, Neyshabur, Iran
[8] Bundelkhand Inst Engn & Technol BIET, Dept Appl Sci, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India
[9] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang, Vietnam
[10] Duy Tan Univ, Sch Engn Technol, Da Nang, Vietnam
关键词
DRINKING-WATER; UTTAR-PRADESH; CITY; PROVINCE; CONTAMINATION; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-46197-7
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study quantifies the groundwater fluoride contamination and assesses associated health risks in fluoride-prone areas of the city of Taj Mahal, Agra, India. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) risk model and Monte Carlo Simulations were employed for the assessment. Result revealed that, among various rural and urban areas Pachgain Kheda exhibited the highest average fluoride concentration (5.20 mg/L), while Bagda showed the lowest (0.33 mg/L). Similarly, K.K. Nagar recorded 4.38 mg/L, and Dayalbagh had 1.35 mg/L. Both urban and rural areas exceeded the WHO-recommended limit of 1.5 mg/L, signifying significant public health implications. Health risk assessment indicated a notably elevated probability of non-carcinogenic risk from oral groundwater fluoride exposure in the rural Baroli Ahir block. Risk simulations highlighted that children faced the highest health risks, followed by teenagers and adults. Further, Monte Carlo simulation addressed uncertainties, emphasizing escalated risks for for children and teenagers. The Hazard Quotient (HQ) values for the 5th and 95th percentile in rural areas ranged from was 0.28-5.58 for children, 0.15-2.58 for teenager, and 0.05-0.58 for adults. In urban areas, from the range was 0.53 to 5.26 for children, 0.27 to 2.41 for teenagers, and 0.1 to 0.53 for adults. Physiological and exposure variations rendered children and teenagers more susceptible. According to the mathematical model, calculations for the non-cancerous risk of drinking water (HQ-ing), the most significant parameters in all the targeted groups of rural areas were concentration (C-W) and Ingestion rate (IR). These findings hold relevance for policymakers and regulatory boards in understanding the actual impact and setting pre-remediation goals.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Fluoride in drinking water: A review on the status and stress effects [J].
Ayoob, S. ;
Gupta, A. K. .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 36 (06) :433-487
[12]   Health risk assessment techniques to evaluate non-carcinogenic human health risk due to fluoride, nitrite and nitrate using Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis in Groundwater of Khaf County, Iran [J].
Bazeli, Javad ;
Ghalehaskar, Sahar ;
Morovati, Maryam ;
Soleimani, Hamed ;
Masoumi, Safdar ;
Sani, Abolfazl Rahmani ;
Saghi, Mohammad Hossein ;
Rastegar, Ayoob .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2022, 102 (08) :1793-1813
[13]   Approaches for describing and communicating overall uncertainty in toxicity characterizations: US Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) as a case study [J].
Beck, Nancy B. ;
Becker, Richard A. ;
Erraguntla, Neeraja ;
Farland, William H. ;
Grant, Roberta L. ;
Gray, George ;
Kirman, Christopher ;
LaKind, Judy S. ;
Lewis, R. Jeffrey ;
Nance, Patricia ;
Pottenger, Lynn H. ;
Santos, Susan L. ;
Shirley, Stephanie ;
Simon, Ted ;
Dourson, Michael L. .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 89-90 :110-128
[14]  
Bridgewater L., 2012, Standard Methods For the Examination of Water and Wastewater
[15]  
Carton RJ, 2006, FLUORIDE, V39, P163
[16]   Developmental Fluoride Neurotoxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Choi, Anna L. ;
Sun, Guifan ;
Zhang, Ying ;
Grandjean, Philippe .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 120 (10) :1362-1368
[17]   Fluoride contamination in groundwater resources in the southern Iran and its related human health risks [J].
Dehghani, Mohammad Hadi ;
Zarei, Ahmad ;
Yousefi, Mahmood ;
Asghari, Farzaneh Baghal ;
Haghighat, Gholam Ali .
DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2019, 153 :95-104
[18]  
Dobaradaran S, 2009, FLUORIDE, V42, P228
[19]  
Duggal V., 2022, Environ. Adv., V8, DOI [10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100242, DOI 10.1016/J.ENVADV.2022.100242]
[20]   Nitrate health risk and geochemical characteristics of water in a semi-urban: implications from graphical plots and statistical computing [J].
Egbueri, J. C. ;
Agbasi, J. C. ;
Ikwuka, C. F. ;
Chiaghanam, O. I. ;
Khan, M. I. ;
Khan, M. Y. A. ;
Khan, N. ;
Uwajingba, H. C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2024, 104 (19) :8491-8511