Scientometric assessment of funded scientometrics and bibliometrics research (2011-2021)

被引:9
作者
Verma, Manoj Kumar [1 ]
Khan, Daud [2 ]
Yuvaraj, Mayank [3 ]
机构
[1] Mizoram Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Aizwal, India
[2] Aligarh Muslim Univ, Maulana Azad Lib, Aligarh, India
[3] Cent Univ South Bihar, Rajarshi Janak Cent Lib, Gaya, India
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Scientometric; Scientometrics; Bibliometric; Bibliometrics; Funded research; FUNDING INFORMATION; PUBLICATION OUTPUT; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; WEB;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-023-04767-6
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A scientometric analysis of funded scientometric and bibliometric research from 2011 to 2021 is presented in this paper. Using Web of Science, we analyzed 2810 domain-relevant papers (DRP) and 1040 methodologically relevant papers (MRP). A number of standard scientometric parameters have been examined in the study, including the relative growth rate (RGR), the doubling time (DT), the activity index (AI), the average citations per paper (ACCP), and the h-index. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the parameters associated with the most productive funding agencies, international country collaboration patterns, top journals, most productive institutions, trends in the field, as well as emerging themes. In this paper, we analyze scientometric and bibliometric research funding by nature of study, which is the first study of its kind.
引用
收藏
页码:4305 / 4320
页数:16
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics
    Aagaard, Kaare
    Mongeon, Philippe
    Ramos-Vielba, Irene
    Thomas, Duncan Andrew
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (05):
  • [2] Does It Pay to Do Novel Science? The Selectivity Patterns in Science Funding
    Ayoubi, Charles
    Pezzoni, Michele
    Visentin, Fabiana
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 48 (05) : 635 - 648
  • [3] Identifying research topics in marketing science along the past decade: a content analysis
    Barahona, Igor
    Micaela Hernandez, Daria
    Hugo Perez-Villarreal, Hector
    del Pilar Martinez-Ruiz, Maria
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 117 (01) : 293 - 312
  • [4] Digitalization and business models: Where are we going? A science map of the field
    Caputo, Andrea
    Pizzi, Simone
    Pellegrini, Massimiliano M.
    Dabic, Marina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 123 : 489 - 501
  • [5] Twenty-eight years of business strategy and the environment research: A bibliometric analysis
    Farrukh, Muhammad
    Meng, Fanchen
    Wu, Yihua
    Nawaz, Kalsoom
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 29 (06) : 2572 - 2582
  • [6] A systematic mapping of funders of maternal health intervention research 2000-2012
    Footman, Katharine
    Chersich, Matthew
    Blaauw, Duane
    Campbell, Oona M. R.
    Dhana, Ashar
    Kavanagh, Josephine
    Dumbaugh, Mari
    Thwala, Siphiwe
    Bijlmakers, Leon
    Vargas, Emily
    Kern, Elinor
    Becerra, Francisco
    Penn-Kekana, Loveday
    [J]. GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2014, 10 : 1 - 11
  • [7] Research fund evaluation based on academic publication output analysis: the case of Chinese research fund evaluation
    Gao, Ji-ping
    Su, Cheng
    Wang, Hai-yan
    Zhai, Li-hua
    Pan, Yun-tao
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2019, 119 (02) : 959 - 972
  • [8] Extramural research grants and scientists' funding strategies: Beggars cannot be choosers?
    Grimpe, Christoph
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (08) : 1448 - 1460
  • [9] An analysis of global research funding from subject field and funding agencies perspectives in the G9 countries
    Huang, Mu-Hsuan
    Huang, Mei-Jhen
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 115 (02) : 833 - 847
  • [10] How Does National Scientific Funding Support Emerging Interdisciplinary Research: A Comparison Study of Big Data Research in the US and China
    Huang, Ying
    Zhang, Yi
    Youtie, Jan
    Porter, Alan L.
    Wang, Xuefeng
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (05):