Enhanced PSA Density Prediction Accuracy When Based on Machine Learning

被引:1
作者
Stojadinovic, Miroslav [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Milicevic, Bogdan [3 ,4 ]
Jankovic, Slobodan [5 ]
机构
[1] Clin Ctr Kragujevac, Clin Urol & Nephrol, Dept Urol, Kragujevac, Serbia
[2] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Med Sci, Kragujevac, Serbia
[3] Bioengn Res & Dev Ctr BioIRC Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
[4] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Engn, Kragujevac, Serbia
[5] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Med Sci, Pharmacol & Toxicol Dept, Kragujevac, Serbia
[6] Clin Ctr Kragujevac, Dept Urol, Clin Urol & Nephrol, Zmaj Jovina 30, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
关键词
Prostate cancer; Prostate biopsy; PSA density; Random forest; Web-based model; PROSTATE-CANCER; ANTIGEN DENSITY; GLEASON SCORE; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; VOLUME; MEN; EFFICIENCY; ALGORITHM; PATHOLOGY; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1007/s40846-023-00793-0
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
PurposeThe prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density (PSAD) in prostate cancer (PCa) detection has limited applicability and is probably caused by moderate accuracy. The purpose of this study was to create a machine learning (ML) PSAD model that incorporates PSAD predictors for forecasting clinically significant (cs) prostate cancer (PCa) probability and compare its performance to that of the traditional PSAD.MethodsPSA and prostate volume (PV) were retrieved from the 725 patients that were subjected to prostate biopsy. After resampling and splitting data, we used the training set to create seven ML algorithms. We chose the RF model that was the most accurate. The area under the curve (AUC) accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity of PSAD and RF PSAD diagnostic performance were compared. Additionally, the ML model's explainability and its website placement were performed.ResultscsPCa was found in 140 males (19.3%). The proposed novel model exhibited much higher evolution metrics than PSAD. AUC for the PSAD and RF PSAD were 0.757 and 0.942, respectively. The reliability diagram indicates that the RF model fits the data well. For the RF model, the decision curve analysis revealed a net benefit of more than 5%, and 40% subjects could avoid unnecessary biopsy. PV was the more important determinant for csPCa. PSA and PV had non-monotonic relationships and a lot of turbulence.ConclusionThe RF PSAD model demonstrated strong discrimination and clinical value, which could aid urologists in determining whether a prostate biopsy is required.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 257
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical value of a radiomics model based on machine learning for the prediction of prostate cancer
    Chen, Zhen-Lin
    Huang, Zhang-Cheng
    Lin, Shao-Shan
    Li, Zhi-Hao
    Dou, Rui-Ling
    Xu, Yue
    Jiang, Shao-Qin
    Li, Meng-Qiang
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 52 (10)
  • [22] A Machine Learning Approach to Enhanced Oil Recovery Prediction
    Krasnov, Fedor
    Glavnov, Nikolay
    Sitnikov, Alexander
    ANALYSIS OF IMAGES, SOCIAL NETWORKS AND TEXTS, AIST 2017, 2018, 10716 : 164 - 171
  • [23] Prostate Volume Estimation on MRI: Accuracy and Effects of Ellipsoid and Bullet-Shaped Measurements on PSA Density
    Stanzione, Arnaldo
    Ponsiglione, Andrea
    Di Fiore, Gianluca Armando
    Picchi, Stefano Giusto
    Di Stasi, Martina
    Verde, Francesco
    Petretta, Mario
    Imbriaco, Massimo
    Cuocolo, Renato
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 28 (08) : E219 - E226
  • [24] The Value of PSA, Free-to-total PSA Ratio and PSA Density in the Prediction of Pathologic Stage for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
    Güven Aslan
    Bora İrer
    Aykut Kefi
    İlhan Çelebi
    Kutsal Yörükoğlu
    Adil Esen
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2005, 37 : 511 - 514
  • [25] The value of PSA, free-to-total PSA ratio and PSA density in the prediction of pathologic stage for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Aslan, Guven
    Irer, Bora
    Kefi, Aykut
    Celebi, Ilhan
    Yorukoglu, Kutsal
    Esen, Adil
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 37 (03) : 511 - 514
  • [26] Treatment prediction with machine learning in prostate cancer patients
    Alatas, Emre
    Kokkulunk, Handan Tanyildizi
    Tanyildizi, Hilal
    Alcin, Goksel
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 28 (04) : 572 - 580
  • [27] Rainfall Prediction: Accuracy Enhancement Using Machine Learning and Forecasting Techniques
    Shah, Urmay
    Garg, Sanjay
    NehaSisodiya
    Dube, Nitant
    Sharma, Shashikant
    2018 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PARALLEL, DISTRIBUTED AND GRID COMPUTING (IEEE PDGC), 2018, : 776 - 782
  • [28] Significance of Accuracy Levels in Cancer Prediction using Machine Learning Techniques
    Kumar, Ajay
    Sushil, Rama
    Tiwari, Arvind Kumar
    BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 12 (03): : 741 - 747
  • [29] MRI-Based Surrogate Imaging Markers of Aggressiveness in Prostate Cancer: Development of a Machine Learning Model Based on Radiomic Features
    Dominguez, Ignacio
    Rios-Ibacache, Odette
    Caprile, Paola
    Gonzalez, Jose
    San Francisco, Ignacio F.
    Besa, Cecilia
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (17)
  • [30] Comparative Analysis of PSA Density and an MRI-Based Predictive Model to Improve the Selection of Candidates for Prostate Biopsy
    Morote, Juan
    Borque-Fernando, Angel
    Triquell, Marina
    Celma, Anna
    Regis, Lucas
    Mast, Richard
    de Torres, Ines M.
    Semidey, Maria E.
    Abascal, Jose M.
    Servian, Pol
    Santamaria, Anna
    Planas, Jacques
    Esteban, Luis M.
    Trilla, Enrique
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (10)