Reflexive Quality Criteria: Questions and Indicators for Purpose-Driven Special Education Qualitative Research

被引:15
作者
Banks, Joy [2 ]
Gonzalez, Taucia [3 ]
Mueller, Carlyn [4 ]
Pacheco, Mariana [4 ]
Scott, LaRon A. [5 ]
Trainor, Audrey A. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Teaching & Learning, 239 Greene St Rm 524, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] George Mason Univ, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
[5] Univ Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA
[6] NYU, New York, NY 10003 USA
关键词
DISABILITY; DISPROPORTIONALITY; STUDENTS; RACE; DIS/ABILITY; MINORITIES; CHALLENGES; IDEOLOGY; LEARNERS; IDENTITY;
D O I
10.1177/00144029231168106
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Qualitative research (QR) has gained visibility and acceptance in the field of special education due to early efforts to identify quality indicators focused on technical and methodological aspects of QR. Whereas these indicators focused on credibility and trustworthiness of data, this article articulates additional QR quality indicators to enhance the value and power of researcher reflexivity as a means to expand the capacity of purpose- and equity-driven special education research. First, the need for reflexivity criteria is addressed. Next, reflexivity criteria are operationalized in key questions that engage researchers in self-reflection: (a) Why do QR? (b) By whom, for whom, and with whom is QR being conducted? and (c) Who is affected by the benefits and costs of QR? These questions encourage researchers to grapple with the complexity of experiences, outcomes, and structures associated with special education and ultimately advance more equitable policy and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 466
页数:18
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Annamma S., 2015, Urban Review, V47, P293, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S11256-014-0293-6, 10.1007/s11256-014-0293-6]
[2]   Challenging the ideology of normal in schools [J].
Annamma, Subini A. ;
Boele, Amy L. ;
Moore, Brooke A. ;
Klingner, Janette .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, 2013, 17 (12) :1278-1294
[3]   Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and society [J].
Annamma, Subini Ancy ;
Jackson, Darrell D. ;
Morrison, Deb .
RACE ETHNICITY AND EDUCATION, 2017, 20 (02) :147-162
[5]   The dilemma of difference: Enriching the disproportionality discourse with theory and context [J].
Artiles, AJ .
JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION, 1998, 32 (01) :32-36
[6]   Fourteenth Annual Brown Lecture in Education Research: Reenvisioning Equity Research: Disability Identification Disparities as a Case in Point [J].
Artiles, Alfredo J. .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2019, 48 (06) :325-335
[7]   Beyond research on cultural minorities: Challenges and implications of research as situated cultural practice [J].
Arzubiaga, Angela E. ;
Artiles, Alfredo J. ;
King, Kathleen A. ;
Harris-Murri, Nancy .
EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2008, 74 (03) :309-327
[8]   Reflexive Quality Criteria: Questions and Indicators for Purpose-Driven Special Education Qualitative Research [J].
Banks, Joy ;
Gonzalez, Taucia ;
Mueller, Carlyn ;
Pacheco, Mariana ;
Scott, LaRon A. ;
Trainor, Audrey A. .
EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2023, 89 (04) :449-466
[9]   Invisible man: examining the intersectionality of disability, race, and gender in an urban community [J].
Banks, Joy .
DISABILITY & SOCIETY, 2018, 33 (06) :894-908
[10]  
Banks J, 2017, EQUITY EXCELL EDUC, V50, P96, DOI 10.1080/10665684.2016.1250235