Machine learning approach with various regression models for predicting the ultimate tensile strength of the friction stir welded AA 2050-T8 joints by the K-Fold cross-validation method

被引:41
作者
Anandan, B. [1 ]
Manikandan, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Vellore 632014, India
关键词
AA; 2050; Optimization; Machine learning; Regression models; UTS; K-Fold Cross-Validation; AA6061; ALUMINUM-ALLOYS; PROCESS PARAMETERS; OPTIMIZATION; FSW;
D O I
10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.105286
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This research work aims to develop the friction stir welding (FSW) technique to resolve the solidification issues when joining the AA2050-T8. The identification of the right process parameters is a major task in the FSW process. Consequently, the experimentation was carried out to optimize the process parameters for the AA2050 FSW joint. For this, an empirical relationship was developed using a statistical tool such as the design of experiments (DOE) with analysis of variance (ANOVA) to optimize the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) with the highest level of confidence. The desirable process parameter was identified to achieve the maximum UTS from the Response Surface Methodology through numerical optimization. The welding was conducted using the optimized process parameters and the tensile test was carried out. The obtained results (average UTS is 371 MPa) were extremely close to the optimized maximum UTS (378 MPa). Furthermore, the same input and output responses from DOE were utilized as input parameters for the machine learning (ML) approach. To predict the UTS based on process parameters, various regression models were used in the ML approach. As a result, all the regression models show very small variations except the polynomial regression model. So, the K-Fold crossvalidation method was implemented to achieve the highest accuracy of these regression models. The result, compared to other regression models, the Random Forest regression model is highly suitable to predict UTS for AA2050 FSW joints.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Machine learning approach for predicting the peak temperature of dissimilar AA7050-AA2014A friction stir welding butt joint using various regression models [J].
Anandan, B. ;
Manikandan, M. .
MATERIALS LETTERS, 2022, 325
[2]  
Balasubramanian V., 2008, International Journal of Microstructure and Materials Properties, V3, P837, DOI 10.1504/IJMMP.2008.022618
[3]   Parametric optimization for friction stir welding with AA2024 and AA6061 aluminium alloys by ANOVA and GRG [J].
Chanakyan, C. ;
Sivasankar, S. ;
Alagarsamy, S. V. ;
Kumar, S. Dinesh ;
Sakthivelu, S. ;
Meignanamoorthy, M. ;
Ravichandran, M. .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 27 :707-711
[4]   Prediction of the vertical force during FSW of AZ31 magnesium alloy sheets using an artificial neural network-based model [J].
D'Orazio, Alessio ;
Forcellese, Archimede ;
Simoncini, Michela .
NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2019, 31 (11) :7211-7226
[5]   Recent developments in advanced aircraft aluminium alloys [J].
Dursun, Tolga ;
Soutis, Costas .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2014, 56 :862-871
[6]   Optimization of friction stir welding process to join dissimilar AA2014 and AA7075 aluminum alloys [J].
Haribalaji, V ;
Boopathi, Sampath ;
Asif, M. Mohammed .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 50 :2227-2234
[7]  
Henrique BM., 2018, The Journal of Finance and Data Science, V4, P183, DOI [10.1016/j.jfds.2018.04.003, DOI 10.1016/J.JFDS.2018.04.003]
[8]   Impact of friction stir welding (FSW) process parameters on tensile strength during dissimilar welds of AA2014 and AA6061 [J].
Jenarthanan, M. P. ;
Varma, C. Varun ;
Manohar, V. Krishna .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 5 (06) :14384-14391
[9]   Multiple predicting K-fold cross-validation for model selection [J].
Jung, Yoonsuh .
JOURNAL OF NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICS, 2018, 30 (01) :197-215
[10]   Optimization of process parameters of aluminum alloy AA 2014-T6 friction stir welds by response surface methodology [J].
Kadaganchi, Ramanjaneyulu ;
Gankidi, Madhusudhan Reddy ;
Gokhale, Hina .
DEFENCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 11 (03) :209-219