Returning study results to research participants: Data access, format, and sharing preferences

被引:2
作者
Mangal, Sabrina [1 ,2 ,6 ]
de Rivera, Stephanie Nino [1 ,3 ]
Choi, Jacky [1 ]
Turchioe, Meghan Reading [1 ,3 ]
Benda, Natalie [1 ,3 ]
Sharko, Marianne [1 ]
Myers, Annie [1 ,3 ]
Goyal, Parag [4 ]
Dugdale, Lydia [5 ]
Creber, Ruth Masterson [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Biobehav Nursing & Hlth Informat, Sch Nursing, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Sch Nursing, New York, NY USA
[4] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[6] Univ Washington, Sch Nursing, Dept Biobehav Nursing & Hlth Informat, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Transparency; Trust; Patient-reported outcomes; Health informatics; Recruitment; HEALTH; PERCEPTIONS; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104955
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Introduction: Research participants have a growing expectation for transparency with their collected information; however, there is little guidance on participant preferences for receiving health information and how researchers should return this information to participants. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey with a representative sample of 502 participants in the United States. Participants were asked about their preferences for receiving, sharing, and the formatting of health information collected for research purposes. Results: Most participants wanted their health information returned (84 %) to use it for their own knowledge and to manage their own health. Email was the most preferred format for receiving health data (67 %), followed by online website (44 %), and/or paper copy (32 %). Data format preferences varied by age, education, financial resources, subjective numeracy, and health literacy. Around one third of Generation Z (25 %), Millennials (30 %), and Generation X (29 %) participants preferred to receive their health information with a mobile app. In contrast, very few Baby Boomers (12 %) and none from the Silent Generation preferred the mobile app format. Having a paper copy of the data was preferred by 38 % of participants without a college degree compared to those with a college degree. Preferences were highest for sharing all health information with doctors and nurses (77 %), and some information with friends and family (66 %). Conclusion: Study findings support returning research information to participants in multiple formats, including email, online websites, and paper copy. Preferences for whom to share information with varied by stakeholders and by sociodemographic characteristics. Researchers should offer multiple formats to participants and tailor data sharing options to participants' preferences. Future research should further explore combinations of individual characteristics that may further influence data sharing and format preferences.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Returning individual research results to participants: Values, preferences, and expectations
    Kent, Denise A.
    Villegas-Downs, Michelle
    Del Rios, Marina
    Freedman, Michael
    Krishnan, Jerry A.
    Menchaca, Martha G.
    Patil, Crystal L.
    Sculley, Jenny
    Tintle, Nathan
    Gerald, Lynn B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [2] Perspectives on returning individual and aggregate genomic research results to study participants and communities in Kenya: a qualitative study
    Kisiangani, Isaac
    Mohamed, Shukri F.
    Kyobutungi, Catherine
    Tindana, Paulina
    Ghansah, Anita
    Ramsay, Michele
    Asiki, Gershim
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [3] Sharing Unexpected Biomarker Results with Study Participants
    Hernick, Ann D.
    Brown, M. Kathryn
    Pinney, Susan M.
    Biro, Frank M.
    Ball, Kathleen M.
    Bornschein, Robert L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2011, 119 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [4] Research Participants' Preferences for Hypothetical Secondary Results from Genomic Research
    Wynn, Julia
    Martinez, Josue
    Duong, Jimmy
    Chiuzan, Codruta
    Phelan, Jo C.
    Fyer, Abby
    Klitzman, Robert L.
    Appelbaum, Paul S.
    Chung, Wendy K.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2017, 26 (04) : 841 - 851
  • [5] Returning aggregate results of clinical trials: Empirical data of patient preferences
    Aldinger, Carmen E.
    Ligibel, Jennifer
    Shin, Im Hee
    Denninger, John W.
    Bierer, Barbara E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2018, 2 (06) : 356 - 362
  • [6] Open Access Data Sharing in Genomic Research
    Pereira, Stacey
    Gibbs, Richard A.
    McGuire, Amy L.
    GENES, 2014, 5 (03): : 739 - 747
  • [7] Genomic research and wide data sharing: Views of prospective participants
    Trinidad, Susan Brown
    Fullerton, Stephanie M.
    Bares, Julie M.
    Jarvik, Gail P.
    Larson, Eric B.
    Burke, Wylie
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 12 (08) : 486 - 495
  • [8] Principles and practices of returning individual research results to participants in large studies of pregnancy and childhood
    Mash, Clay
    Mcallister, Kimberly A.
    Wonnum, Sundania
    Vargas, Ashley J.
    Dowling, Gaya
    Arteaga, S. Sonia
    Blaisdell, Carol J.
    Hardy, Kristina K.
    Das, Irene Prabhu
    Raju, Tonse N. K.
    Gillman, Matthew W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [9] Research Participants' Preferences for Individual Results of Pharmacogenomics Research: A Case of a Ugandan HIV Research Institute
    Nabukenya, Sylvia
    Waitt, Catriona
    Senyonga, Ronald
    Castelnuovo, Barbara
    Munabi, Ian Guyton
    Kyaddondo, David
    Mwaka, Erisa S.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2023, 18 (04) : 218 - 232
  • [10] Pediatric Data Sharing in Genomic Research: Attitudes and Preferences of Parents
    Burstein, Matthew D.
    Robinson, Jill Oliver
    Hilsenbeck, Susan G.
    McGuire, Amy L.
    Lau, Ching C.
    PEDIATRICS, 2014, 133 (04) : 690 - 697