CEO power and CSR-linked compensation for corporate environmental responsibility: UK evidence

被引:47
作者
Al-Shaer, Habiba [1 ]
Albitar, Khaldoon [2 ]
Liu, Jia [2 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Business Sch, 5 Barrack Rd, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 4SE, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Portsmouth, Fac Business & Law, Portland St, Portsmouth PO1 3DE, Hants, England
关键词
CEO; Managerial power; Legitimate power; CSR-linked compensation; Environmental performance; BOARD GENDER DIVERSITY; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; FIRM VALUE; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; ASSURANCE EVIDENCE; PAY STRUCTURE; ISO; 14001; GOVERNANCE; DISCLOSURE;
D O I
10.1007/s11156-022-01118-z
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper examines how CEO power and CSR-linked compensation influences environmental performance. We investigate the role of CEO managerial power (proxied by CEO duality and the presence of executive directors on the board), and CEO legitimate power (proxied by CEO tenure), adopting three measures of environmental performance, including the environmental scores, carbon emission scores and a composite index assessing the level of a firm's engagement in several environmental practices. Analysing a sample of FTSE-All-Share companies for the period 2011-2019, we find that CEOs who receive compensation from engagement in environmental activities are motivated to improve environmental performance. Moreover, newly appointed CEOs engage more in environmental initiatives, suggesting that they use it as a signal to mitigate career concerns in their early tenure, whereas CEOs with managerial power engage less in environmental projects due to the costs associated with them. These effects are stronger in firms with independent and diverse boards, firms operating in the environmentally sensitive sectors and non-loss-making firms. This study provides original evidence of the role of environmental-linked incentives and managerial power in managing environmental impact and optimising the environmental performance of their companies.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1063
页数:39
相关论文
共 82 条
[51]   The impact of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on firm value: The role of CEO power [J].
Li, Yiwei ;
Gong, Mengfeng ;
Zhang, Xiu-Ye ;
Koh, Lenny .
BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2018, 50 (01) :60-75
[52]   Does corporate environmental responsibility engagement affect firm value? The mediating role of corporate innovation [J].
Li, Zhenghui ;
Liao, Gaoke ;
Albitar, Khaldoon .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 29 (03) :1045-1055
[53]   Corporate Board and Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance: Evidence from China [J].
Liao, Lin ;
Lin, Teng ;
Zhang, Yuyu .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 150 (01) :211-225
[54]  
Liu J, 2021, BRIT J MANAGE, V32, P579, DOI [10.1111/1467-8551.12377, 10.1186/s13661-018-1115-7]
[55]   Assessment of corporate social responsibility by addressing sustainable development goals [J].
Lu, Jintao ;
Liang, Mengshang ;
Zhang, Chong ;
Rong, Dan ;
Guan, Hailing ;
Mazeikaite, Kristina ;
Streimikis, Justas .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 28 (02) :686-703
[56]  
Luo L., 2014, J CONTEMP ACCOUNT EC, V10, P191, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JCAE.2014.08.003
[57]   Sustainability Targets in Executive Remuneration: Targets, Time Frame, Country and Sector Specification [J].
Maas, Karen ;
Rosendaal, Sanne .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 25 (06) :390-401
[58]   Board reputation attributes and corporate social performance: an empirical investigation of the US Best Corporate Citizens [J].
Mallin, Christine A. ;
Michelon, Giovanna .
ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2011, 41 (02) :119-144
[59]   The relationship between corporate environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical study in China [J].
Meng, X. H. ;
Zeng, S. X. ;
Shi, Jonathan J. ;
Qi, G. Y. ;
Zhang, Z. B. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 145 :357-367
[60]   The Effect of Board Capital and CEO Power on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures [J].
Muttakin, Mohammad Badrul ;
Khan, Arifur ;
Mihret, Dessalegn Getie .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 150 (01) :41-56