Fisheries local action groups, small-scale fisheries and territorial development

被引:2
作者
Phillipson, Jeremy [1 ]
Salmi, Pekka [2 ]
Linke, Sebastian [3 ]
Svels, Kristina [2 ]
Budzich-Tabor, Urszula [4 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Ctr Rural Econ, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, England
[2] Nat Resources Inst Finland, Turku, Finland
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Sch Global Studies, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] FAMENET European Fisheries & Aquaculture Monitorin, Brussels, Belgium
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
blue growth; community-led local development (CLLD); FLAG; LEADER; small-scale fisheries; territorial development; RURAL-DEVELOPMENT; LEADER;
D O I
10.1111/soru.12478
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
In comparison to the wealth of critical evaluation of LEADER (i.e., Liaison entre actions de developpement de l'economie rurale), there has been no consolidated attempt to reflect on the contribution of Fisheries Local Action Groups (FLAGs), now entering their third EU programming period. Set up in the image of LEADER, and a novel governance instrument within the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), FLAGs aim to activate local responses that build resilience and adaptability within the fisheries sector and wider communities. In addition to introducing the accompanying articles that make up this special issue of Sociologia Ruralis, our article gives an account of the emergence of community-led local development (CLLD) in fisheries and the attributes that have characterised the application of the LEADER approach within a fisheries-territorial development context. In many cases, FLAGs have led to improved relationships between the small-scale fishing sector and wider local social and economic networks, helping the sector reimagine its role within local economies. Yet outcomes vary as the FLAG approach has been applied across different cultural and institutional settings. There are indications that the system is becoming enveloped by wider priorities of coastal development and blue growth. Yet FLAGs may well provide a successful test case for widening participation in the CFP and upscaling integration of the fishing industry within local and regional economies. For CLLD in general, they are a reminder of the value of a differentiated CLLD approach tailored to different sectoral-territorial contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 414
页数:16
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   Towards territorial development in fisheries areas: A typology of projects funded by Fisheries Local Action Groups [J].
Miret-Pastor, Lluis ;
Svels, Kristina ;
Freeman, Richard .
MARINE POLICY, 2020, 119
[22]  
Osterblom H., 2020, OCEAN EQUITY
[23]   Untitled [J].
Otterstad, O ;
Symes, D .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 1996, 36 (02) :145-145
[24]  
Percy J., 2020, Small-Scale Fisheries in Europe: Status, resilience and governance, VVolume 23, P23, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-37371-9_2
[25]   Finding a Middle Way to Develop Europe's Fisheries Dependent Areas: The Role of Fisheries Local Action Groups [J].
Phillipson, Jeremy ;
Symes, David .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2015, 55 (03) :343-359
[26]   Resilience and Adaptation of Fishing Communities [J].
Phillipson, Jeremy ;
Symes, David ;
Salmi, Pekka .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2015, 55 (03) :243-244
[27]  
Raakjær J, 2012, MARIT STUD, V11, DOI 10.1186/2212-9790-11-5
[28]   The EU LEADER programme: Rural development laboratory [J].
Ray, C .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2000, 40 (02) :163-+
[29]  
Ray C., 2000, HDB RURAL STUDIES, P278
[30]  
Reinma L., 2017, EST MAN AUTH FARNET