Enhancing Digital Innovation Ecosystem Resilience through the Interplay of Organizational, Technological, and Environmental Factors: A Study of 31 Provinces in China Using NCA and fsQCA

被引:12
作者
Zhang, Ming [1 ]
Cheng, Ruoran [1 ]
Fei, Jiabao [1 ]
Khanal, Ribesh [1 ]
机构
[1] China Three Gorges Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Yichang 443002, Peoples R China
关键词
digital innovation ecosystem; resilience; TOE framework; necessary condition analysis; fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis;
D O I
10.3390/su16051946
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Digital innovation ecosystems are currently experiencing a period of growth and are navigating uncertain environments. Improving resilience is an important prerequisite for ensuring sustainable developments. This study, based on the technology, organization, and environment (TOE) framework, examines the impact of multilevel antecedent conditions on digital innovation ecosystem resilience using data from 31 Chinese provinces. By applying a necessary condition analysis (NCA) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), this study reveals complex causal relationships between five antecedents at the "technology-organization-environment" levels and digital innovation ecosystem resilience, along with the improvement paths of digital innovation ecosystem resilience. The results show the following: Firstly, individual antecedent conditions alone do not constitute necessary conditions for high or non-high digital innovation ecosystem resilience. Secondly, there are five configuration paths leading to high digital innovation ecosystem resilience, namely, a digital technology-enabled organization-environment-driven type (H1a), an organization-environment dual-wheel-driven type (H1b), a digital technology-led environment-driven type (H2), a technology-organization-environment trilateral type (H3), and a pressure-organization-driven type (H4). Thirdly, three configuration paths result in non-high digital innovation ecosystem resilience, exhibiting an asymmetric relationship with paths associated with the configuration paths of high digital innovation ecosystem resilience. Finally, potential substitution relationships exist among antecedent conditions at the technological, organizational, and environmental levels.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Beijing News
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2024, PAPER
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, GARTNER Market Share: It Services, Worldwide
[4]  
Bai T, 2022, Financial Engineering and Risk Management, V5, P61, DOI 10.23977/ferm.2022.050110
[5]   Resource-based theories of competitive advantage:: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view [J].
Barney, JB .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2001, 27 (06) :643-650
[6]   Exaptation in a digital innovation ecosystem: The disruptive impacts of 3D printing [J].
Beltagui, Ahmad ;
Rosli, Ainurul ;
Candi, Marina .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2020, 49 (01)
[7]  
[蔡莉 Cai Li], 2019, [科学学研究, Studies in Science of Science], V37, P1816
[8]   A General framework for studying the evolution of the digital innovation ecosystem: The case of big data [J].
Chae, Bongsug .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 45 :83-94
[9]   Research on Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Regional Digital Innovation Ecosystem Resilience-Empirical Research Based on Panel Data of 30 Provinces and Cities in China [J].
Chen, Hongmei ;
Cai, Songlin .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (13)
[10]  
[陈爽英 Chen Shuangying], 2022, [科学学研究, Studies in Science of Science], V40, P410