Corporate environmental reporting in the China context: The interplay of stakeholder salience, socialist ideology and state power

被引:14
作者
Qian, Wei [1 ]
Parker, Lee [2 ]
Zhu, Jingyu [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia Business, Adelaide, Australia
[2] Univ Glasgow, Adam Smith Business Sch, Glasgow, Scotland
[3] Yunnan Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accounting, Kunming, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental reporting; Stakeholder salience; Socialist ideology; Stakeholder responsibility; Imprinting; China; RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE; CSR DISCLOSURE; PERFORMANCE; FIRMS; LEGITIMACY; SUSTAINABILITY; PRIORITIZATION; IDENTIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.bar.2023.101198
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Research considers that the increase in corporate environmental reporting over the past decades has been a response to stakeholder demand and pressure within and beyond the boundaries of business operations. Recent empirical studies have begun to extrapolate the stakeholder concept and rationale into developing countries when explaining their growing reporting practices. However, how this global trend is played out in the particular institutional developing country context remains unanswered. This research addresses the issue by employing a case study of a leading mining company in China. The study finds that corporate managers do understand the importance of stakeholder communication and engagement. Such importance has been framed into national social obligations within the socialist ideology long embedded and more recently reinforced in the minds of managers. It reveals an imprinting process of ideological prioritisation through which imprinted socialist philosophies and values are entrenched in perceived stakeholder salience and responsibility for environmental reporting. This process is decoupled from delivering procedural compliance via accountability reporting because of the dominance of State power and national collective interests over individual rights. This study suggests that socially and politically embedded philosophies and ideology ingrained in a country can create another layer of criteria when managers interpret and determine the salience of individual stakeholders and make reporting decisions. It highlights that the extent to which the salience of stakeholders is understood and responded to in the environmental reporting process is conditioned by the structure and operation of a country's political and social system.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]   Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values [J].
Agle, BR ;
Mitchell, RK ;
Sonnenfeld, JA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :507-525
[2]   The past is never dead: the role of imprints in shaping social and environmental reporting in a post-communist context [J].
Albu, Nadia ;
Albu, Catalin Nicolae ;
Apostol, Oana ;
Cho, Charles H. .
ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2021, 34 (05) :1109-1136
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, TIME HAS COME KPMG S
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1965, Handbook of Organizations, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17019-6
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, KPMG SURVEY CORPORAT
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.JACCPUBPOL.2004.12.007, 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.12.007]
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2008, International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2008
[10]   Corporate environmental responsibility and accountability: What chance in vulnerable Bangladesh? [J].
Belal, Ataur Rahman ;
Cooper, Stuart M. ;
Khan, Niaz Ahmed .
CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, 2015, 33 :44-58