Landscape heterogeneity provides co-benefits to predator and prey

被引:7
作者
Kuntze, Corbin C. [1 ]
Pauli, Jonathan N. [1 ]
Zulla, Ceeanna J. [1 ]
Keane, John J. [2 ]
Roberts, Kevin N. [3 ]
Dotters, Brian P. [3 ]
Sawyer, Sarah C. [4 ]
Peery, M. Zachariah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Forest & Wildlife Ecol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, Pacific Southwest Res Stn, Davis, CA USA
[3] Sierra Pacific Ind, Anderson, CA USA
[4] US Forest Serv, Vallejo, CA USA
关键词
forest management; heterogeneity; predator conservation; predator-prey; spotted owl; woodrat; CALIFORNIA SPOTTED OWLS; DUSKY-FOOTED WOODRATS; HOME-RANGE; HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; RESOURCE SELECTION; SIERRA-NEVADA; ABUNDANCE; DYNAMICS; FOREST;
D O I
10.1002/eap.2908
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Predator populations are imperiled globally, due in part to changing habitat and trophic interactions. Theoretical and laboratory studies suggest that heterogeneous landscapes containing prey refuges acting as source habitats can benefit both predator and prey populations, although the importance of heterogeneity in natural systems is uncertain. Here, we tested the hypothesis that landscape heterogeneity mediates predator-prey interactions between the California spotted owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis)-a mature forest species-and one of its principal prey, the dusky-footed woodrat (Neotoma fuscipes)-a younger forest species-to the benefit of both. We did so by combining estimates of woodrat density and survival from live trapping and very high frequency tracking with direct observations of prey deliveries to dependent young by owls in both heterogeneous and homogeneous home ranges. Woodrat abundance was similar to 2.5 times higher in owl home ranges (14.12 km(2)) featuring greater heterogeneity in vegetation types (1805.0 +/- 50.2 SE) compared to those dominated by mature forest (727.3 +/- 51.9 SE), in large part because of high densities in young forests appearing to act as sources promoting woodrat densities in nearby mature forests. Woodrat mortality rates were low across vegetation types and did not differ between heterogeneous and homogeneous home ranges, yet all observed predation by owls occurred within mature forests, suggesting young forests may act as woodrat refuges. Owls exhibited a type 1 functional response, consuming similar to 2.5 times more woodrats in heterogeneous (31.1/month +/- 5.2 SE) versus homogeneous (12.7/month +/- 3.7 SE) home ranges. While consumption of smaller-bodied alternative prey partially compensated for lower woodrat consumption in homogeneous home ranges, owls nevertheless consumed 30% more biomass in heterogeneous home ranges-approximately equivalent to the energetic needs of producing one additional offspring. Thus, a mosaic of vegetation types including young forest patches increased woodrat abundance and availability that, in turn, provided energetic and potentially reproductive benefits to mature forest-associated spotted owls. More broadly, our findings provide strong empirical evidence that heterogeneous landscapes containing prey refuges can benefit both predator and prey populations. As anthropogenic activities continue to homogenize landscapes globally, promoting heterogeneous systems with prey refuges may benefit imperiled predators.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] Habitat fragmentation and anthropogenic factors affect wildcat Felis silvestris silvestris occupancy and detectability on Mt Etna
    Anile, Stefano
    Devillard, Sebastien
    Ragni, Bernardino
    Rovero, Francesco
    Mattucci, Federica
    Lo Valvo, Mario
    [J]. WILDLIFE BIOLOGY, 2019,
  • [2] Uninformative Parameters and Model Selection Using Akaike's Information Criterion
    Arnold, Todd W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 74 (06) : 1175 - 1178
  • [3] ADAPTATION TO OAK AND OTHER FIBROUS, PHENOLIC-RICH FOLIAGE BY A SMALL MAMMAL, NEOTOMA-FUSCIPES
    ATSATT, PR
    INGRAM, T
    [J]. OECOLOGIA, 1983, 60 (01) : 135 - 142
  • [4] Resource selection by GPS-tagged California spotted owls in mixed-ownership forests
    Atuo, Fidelis A.
    Roberts, Kevin
    Whitmore, Sheila
    Dotters, Brian P.
    Raphael, Martin G.
    Sawyer, Sarah C.
    Keane, John J.
    Gutierrez, R. J.
    Peery, M. Zachariah
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 433 : 295 - 304
  • [5] Responses of small mammal communities to environment and agriculture in a rural mosaic landscape
    Benedek, Ana Maria
    Sirbu, Ioan
    [J]. MAMMALIAN BIOLOGY, 2018, 90 : 55 - 65
  • [6] Vegetation change during 40 years of repeated managed wildfires in the Sierra Nevada, California
    Boisrame, Gabrielle F. S.
    Thompson, Sally E.
    Kelly, Maggi
    Cavalli, Julia
    Wilkin, Kate M.
    Stephens, Scott L.
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 402 : 241 - 252
  • [7] Future restoration should enhance ecological complexity and emergent properties at multiple scales
    Bullock, James M.
    Fuentes-Montemayor, Elisa
    McCarthy, Ben
    Park, Kirsty
    Hails, Rosie S.
    Woodcock, Ben A.
    Watts, Kevin
    Corstanje, Ron
    Harris, Jim
    [J]. ECOGRAPHY, 2022, 2022 (04)
  • [8] Carraway L.N., 1991, Mammalian Species, P1
  • [9] Impacts of different land management histories on forest change
    Collins, Brandon M.
    Fry, Danny L.
    Lydersen, Jamie M.
    Everett, Richard
    Stephens, Scott L.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2017, 27 (08) : 2475 - 2486
  • [10] Collins BM, 2010, J FOREST, V108, P24