Personalised colorectal cancer screening strategies: Information needs of the target population

被引:1
作者
Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther [1 ]
de Jonge, Lucie [1 ]
Breekveldt, Emilie C. H. [1 ,2 ]
Korfage, Ida J. [1 ]
Usher-Smith, Juliet A. [3 ]
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris [1 ]
Dennison, Rebecca A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Univ Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Primary Care Unit, Cambridge, England
关键词
Personalised cancer screening; Colorectal cancer; Information need; Participation; Cancer risk; Information provision; SAMPLE-SIZE; BREAST; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102325
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Prior faecal Hemoglobin (f-Hb) concentrations of a negative fecal immunochemical test (FIT) can be used for risk stratification in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Individuals with higher f-Hb concentrations may benefit from a shorter screening interval (1 year), whereas individuals with undetectable f-Hb concentrations could benefit from a longer screening interval (3 year). Individuals' views on personalised CRC screening and information needed to make a well-informed decision is unknown. We conducted three semi-structured focus groups among individuals eligible for CRC screening (i.e. men and women aged 55 to 75) in the Netherlands. Thematic analysis was used to analyse participants' information need on personalised CRC screening strategies. Fourteen individuals took part. The majority were positive about CRC screening and indicated that they would participate in personalised CRC screening. The rationale for a longer interval among those at lowest risk was, however, unclear for many. The preferred information on individual risk was variable: ranging from full information to only information on the personalised strategy without mentioning the risk. It was not possible to address everyone's need with a single approach. Additional communications, e.g. public media campaigns, billboards, videos on social media, were also suggested as necessary. This study showed that preferences on receiving information on individual CRC risk varied substantially and no consensus was reached. Introducing a personalised screening programme will require careful communication, particularly around the rationale for the strategy, and a layered approach to deliver information.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238]
[2]  
Breekveldt E.C.H., 2023, FIT-based program, V23, P45
[3]   Factors associated with interval colorectal cancer after negative FIT: Results of two screening rounds in the Dutch FIT-based CRC screening program [J].
Breekveldt, Emilie C. H. ;
Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther ;
van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer, Hilliene J. ;
de Jonge, Lucie ;
Kooyker, Arthur I. ;
Spaander, Manon C. W. ;
van Vuuren, Anneke J. ;
van Kemenade, Folkert J. ;
Ramakers, Christian ;
Dekker, Evelien ;
Nagtegaal, Iris D. ;
van Leerdam, Monique E. ;
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 152 (08) :1536-1546
[4]   A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions [J].
Cairns, J. M. ;
Greenley, S. ;
Bamidele, O. ;
Weller, D. .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2022, 33 (05) :653-685
[5]   Should women aged 70-74 be invited to participate in screening mammography? A report on two Australian community juries [J].
Degeling, Chris ;
Barratt, Alexandra ;
Aranda, Sanchia ;
Bell, Robin ;
Doust, Jenny ;
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Hersch, Jolyn ;
Sakowsky, Ruben ;
Entwistle, Vikki ;
Carter, Stacy M. .
BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (06)
[6]   A focus group study on breast cancer risk presentation: one format does not fit all [J].
Dorval, Michel ;
Bouchard, Karine ;
Chiquette, Jocelyne ;
Glendon, Gord ;
Maugard, Christine M. ;
Dubuisson, Wilhelm ;
Panchal, Seema ;
Simard, Jacques .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2013, 21 (07) :719-724
[7]   Sample Size Policy for Qualitative Studies Using In-Depth Interviews [J].
Dworkin, Shari L. .
ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2012, 41 (06) :1319-1320
[8]   Acceptability of risk-stratified breast screening: Effect of the order of presenting risk and benefit information [J].
Ghanouni, Alex ;
Waller, Jo ;
Stoffel, Sandro T. ;
Vlaev, Ivo ;
von Wagner, Christian .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2020, 27 (01) :52-56
[9]  
Health Council of the Netherlands, 2013, Population Screening Act: national population screening programme for bowel cancer
[10]   'A Low Risk Is Still a Risk': Exploring Women's Attitudes towards Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Susceptibility in Order to Target Disease Prevention [J].
Henneman, L. ;
Timmermans, D. R. ;
Bouwman, C. M. ;
Cornel, M. C. ;
Meijers-Heijboer, H. .
PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2011, 14 (4-5) :238-247