Steering Selectivity in the Four-Electron and Two-Electron Oxygen Reduction Reactions: On the Importance of the Volcano Slope

In the last decade, trends for competing electrocatalytic processes have been largely captured by volcano plots, which can be constructedby the analysis of adsorption free energies as derived from electronicstructure theory in the density functional theory approximation. One prototypical example refers to the four-electron and two-electron oxygen reduction reactions (ORRs), resulting in the formation of water and hydrogen peroxide, respectively. The conventional thermodynamic volcano curve illustrates that the four-electron and two-electron ORRs reveal the same slopes at the volcano legs. This finding is related to two facts, namely, that only a single mechanistic description is considered in the model, and electrocatalytic activity is assessed by the concept of the limiting potential, a simple thermodynamic descriptorevaluated at the equilibrium potential. In the present contribution,the selectivity challenge of the four-electron and two-electron ORRs is analyzed, thereby accounting for two major expansions. First, different reaction mechanisms are included into the analysis, and second, G(max)(U), a potential-dependent activity measure that factors overpotential and kinetic effects into the evaluation of adsorption free energies, is applied for approximation of electrocatalytic activity. It is illustrated that the slope of the four-electron ORR is not constant at the volcano legs but rather is prone to change as soon as another mechanistic pathway is energetically preferred or another elementary step becomes the limiting one. Due to the varying slope of the four-electron ORR volcano, a trade-off between activity and selectivity for hydrogen peroxide formation is observed. It is demonstrated that the two-electron ORR is energetically preferred at the left and right volcano legs, thus opening a new strategy for the selective formation of H2O2 by an environmentally benign route.