Disentangling the effect of nitrogen input and weed control on crop-weed competition suggests a potential agronomic trap in conventional farming

被引:13
作者
Berquer, Adrien [1 ,2 ]
Bretagnolle, Vincent [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Martin, Olivier [4 ]
Gaba, Sabrina [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] CNRS, Ctr Etudes Biol Chize, UMR7372, F-79360 Villiers En Bois, France
[2] Univ Rochelle, F-79360 Villiers En Bois, France
[3] LTSER Zone Atelier Plaine & Val Sevre, F-79360 Villiers En Bois, France
[4] INRAE, UR 0546 Biostat & Proc Spatiaux, F-84914 Avignon 09, France
[5] Ctr Etudes Biol Chize, INRAE, USC 1339 Agripop, F-79360 Villiers En Bois, France
[6] Ctr Etudes Biol Chize, USC Agripop 1339, INRAE, F-79360 Villiers En Bois, France
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Agroecology; Competition; Nitrogen; Experiment; Weed control; Winter cereal; FERTILIZER; YIELD; MANAGEMENT; WHEAT; HERBICIDES; DIVERSITY; DENSITY; GROWTH; SUSTAINABILITY; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2022.108232
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Weeds are commonly assumed to induce yield loss because of resource competition. However, there is growing empirical evidence that the picture is much more complex, because fertilizer inputs, by modifying the level of resources and weeding by removing some weed species, affect the outcome of crop-weed interaction. We assess how two important crop production inputs - nitrogen (N) fertilization and weed-control - affect a fundamental non-chemical means of weed management, the outcome of crop-weed competition, in real field conditions in 56 winter cereal fields, of which 23 were organically farmed. We used a factorial design with two levels (absence/ presence) of nitrogen input and weed control inputs, but in our case, the "control" (i.e., presence level) for both practices was the usual practice of the farmer (which therefore varied). We found that crop aboveground biomass and grain yield were positively related to the amount of Ntotal (N soil plus N fertilizer), while weed species assemblages were negatively affected, showing lower species richness and weed abundance (i.e., number of plants). We also detected a contrast between farming systems: conventional fields (CF), managed with higher amount of total N and weed control, showed higher crop biomass and grain yield, and lower weed abundance compared to organically farmed fields (OF). Importantly, the findings showed that the outcome of the competition between crops and weeds was largely in favor of the crop plants in CF fields, even in the absence of weed control. In OF fields, the outcome of the competition between weeds and crop plants was still largely in favor of the crop, but at a lesser extent than in CF fields. The patterns were similar in unfertilized plots, though weed control in CF fields was more effective at low amounts of N, suggesting that more intense weed control is required in N-rich fields to maintain crop production. Overall, we argue that these results may underlie an agronomic trap: while an increased supply of nitrogen generally increases crop yield, it also benefits to weeds, requiring more efficient weed control.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [61] Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
    Tilman, D
    Cassman, KG
    Matson, PA
    Naylor, R
    Polasky, S
    [J]. NATURE, 2002, 418 (6898) : 671 - 677
  • [62] The influence of nitrogen supply on the ability of wheat and potato to suppress Stellaria media growth and reproduction
    Van Delden, A
    Lotz, LAP
    Bastiaans, L
    Franke, AC
    Smid, HG
    Groeneveld, RMW
    Kropff, MJ
    [J]. WEED RESEARCH, 2002, 42 (06) : 429 - 445
  • [63] A review of weed management in wheat using crop competition
    van der Meulen, Annemieke
    Chauhan, Bhagirath Singh
    [J]. CROP PROTECTION, 2017, 95 : 38 - 44
  • [64] Herbicide and nitrogen rate effects on weed suppression, N uptake, use efficiency and yield in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)
    Wang, Li
    Liu, Qiuxia
    Dong, Xiaoyan
    Liu, Yi
    Lu, Jianwei
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2019, 17
  • [65] Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health and sustainability costs
    Wilson, C
    Tisdell, C
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 39 (03) : 449 - 462
  • [66] Zimdahl RL., 2004, WEED CROP COMPETITIO, VSecond, P6