Risk Factors of Positive Resection Margin in Hepatectomy for Resectable Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Risk Prediction and Prognosis

被引:2
|
作者
Xia, Feng [1 ]
Zhang, Qiao [2 ]
Zheng, Jun [3 ]
Huang, Zhiyuan [1 ]
Ndhlovu, Elijah [1 ]
Gao, Hengyi [4 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Dept Hepat Surg, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Med Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, Zhongshan Peoples Hosp, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Shenzhen Baoan Dist Peoples Hosp, Dept Sci & Educ, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Shenzhen Longhua Dist Peoples Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
R1; resection; Prediction model; Prognosis; Risk factor; SURGICAL MARGINS; OCCLUSION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s11605-023-05618-8
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and AimClinical work has revealed that hepatectomy for resectable ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) has a relatively high percentage of positive resection margins found in postoperative pathology. It is necessary to evaluate the risk factors associated with R1 resection in patients undergoing hepatectomy for rHCC.MethodsA total of 408 patients with resectable rHCC originating from three centers undergoing surgery from January 2012 to January 2020 were consecutively enrolled in the study to study the prognostic impact of R1 resection using Kaplan-Meier plotting of survival curves. One center with 280 served as the training group, and the other two centers served as the validation group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis screened for variables affecting R1 and developed prediction models, and the models were tested in the validation cohort using the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and calibration curves.ResultsThe prognosis of rHCC patients with positive cut margins was worse than that of patients with R0 resection. Risk factors for R1 resection were tumor max length (OR = 2.668 [1.161-6.131]), microvascular invasion (MVI) (OR = 3.655 [1.766-7.566]), times of hepatic inflow occlusion (1/0:OR = 2.213 [1.113-4.399]; 2/0:OR = 5.723 [2.010-8.289]) and timing of hepatectomy (OR = 5.284 [2.394-9.661]), using tumor max length, times of HIO, and timing of hepatectomy to construct the nomogram, the area under the curve of the model was 0.810 (0.781-0.842) and 0.782 (0.752-0.805) in the training and validation groups, respectively, and the calibration curve of the model was basically on the 45 degrees line.ConclusionsThis study constructs a clinical model to predict R1 resection after hepatectomy for resectable rHCC, which can be used to better plan perioperative strategies for the incidence of R1 resection during hepatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1400 / 1411
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nomogram for individualised prediction of liver failure risk after hepatectomy in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: the evidence from ultrasound data
    Hu, Hao
    Han, Hong
    Han, Xi Kun
    Wang, Wen Ping
    Ding, Hong
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (02) : 877 - 885
  • [22] Nomogram for individualised prediction of liver failure risk after hepatectomy in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: the evidence from ultrasound data
    Hao Hu
    Hong Han
    Xi Kun Han
    Wen Ping Wang
    Hong Ding
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 877 - 885
  • [23] Risk factors for residual tumor after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Chen, Xiao-Hong
    Zhang, Bo-Heng
    Xin, Yin
    Ren, Zheng-Gang
    Fan, Jia
    Qiu, Shuang-Jian
    Zhou, Jian
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 17 (14) : 1889 - 1894
  • [24] Risk factors for residual tumor after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Xiao-Hong Chen
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2011, 17 (14) : 1889 - 1894
  • [25] Prognostic risk factors of survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Hubert, Catherine
    Sempoux, Christine
    Rahier, Jacques
    Horsmans, Yves
    Geubel, Andre
    Van Beers, Bernard E.
    Annet, Laurence
    Zech, Francis
    Leonard, Daniel
    Gigot, Jean-Francois
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 54 (78) : 1791 - 1797
  • [26] Hepatectomy for Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Resection Margin Width Does Not Predict Survival
    Michelakos, T.
    Kontos, F.
    Sekigami, Y.
    Deshpande, V.
    Tanabe, K. K.
    Elias, N.
    Yeh, H.
    Dageforde, L. A.
    Qadan, M.
    Ferrone, C. R.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 1) : S111 - S112
  • [27] Hepatectomy for Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Resection Margin Width Does Not Predict Survival
    Theodoros Michelakos
    Filippos Kontos
    Yurie Sekigami
    Motaz Qadan
    Lei Cai
    Onofrio Catalano
    Vikram Deshpande
    Madhukar S. Patel
    Teppei Yamada
    Nahel Elias
    Leigh Anne Dageforde
    Shoko Kimura
    Tatsuo Kawai
    Kenneth K. Tanabe
    James F. Markmann
    Heidi Yeh
    Cristina R. Ferrone
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2021, 25 : 1727 - 1735
  • [28] Hepatectomy for Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Resection Margin Width Does Not Predict Survival
    Michelakos, Theodoros
    Kontos, Filippos
    Sekigami, Yurie
    Qadan, Motaz
    Cai, Lei
    Catalano, Onofrio
    Deshpande, Vikram
    Patel, Madhukar S.
    Yamada, Teppei
    Elias, Nahel
    Dageforde, Leigh Anne
    Kimura, Shoko
    Kawai, Tatsuo
    Tanabe, Kenneth K.
    Markmann, James F.
    Yeh, Heidi
    Ferrone, Cristina R.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2021, 25 (07) : 1727 - 1735
  • [29] Laparoscopic surgery for adrenocortical carcinoma: Estimating the risk of margin-positive resection
    Carlisle, Kendyl
    Blackburn, Kyle W.
    Japp, Emily A.
    McArdle, Patrick F.
    Turner, Douglas J.
    Terhune, Julia H.
    Englum, Brian R.
    Smith, Philip W.
    Hu, Yinin
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 129 (04) : 691 - 699
  • [30] LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY FOR ADRENOCORTICAL CARCINOMA: ESTIMATING THE RISK OF MARGIN-POSITIVE RESECTION
    Carlisle, K.
    Blackburn, K.
    Okoye, G.
    Japp, E.
    McArdle, P.
    Turner, D.
    Englum, B.
    Smith, P.
    Hu, Y.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (06) : S363 - S363