Heterogeneity and spillover effects of carbon emission trading on green innovation

被引:3
作者
Feng, Yanhong [1 ]
Hu, Qingqing [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South China, Sch Econ Management & Law, Hengyang 421000, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Inst Technol, Sch Int Studies, Hengyang 421000, Peoples R China
关键词
carbon emission trading; green innovation; heterogeneity effects; spillover effects; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; ECO-INNOVATION; CHINA; IMPACT; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.3934/mbe.2023279
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The massive emission of greenhouse gases poses a serious threat to the ecological environment. In this context, the relevant effects of the carbon emission trading (CET) market, which promotes greenhouse gas emission reduction by market means, have been widely investigated. Taking the China's CET pilot as a research target, the heterogeneity and spillover effects of CET on green innovation are explored by using the sample data of 279 prefecture-level cities in China from 2008 to 2019. The results are as follows. First, on the whole, CET significantly promotes strategic green innovation, but it has no significant effect on substantive green innovation. Second, the green innovation effect of CET varies with the level of green innovation, and the heterogeneous effects of green innovation are also reflected in different degrees of marketization, fiscal decentralization and government environmental concern. Third, CET has a positive spillover effect on green innovation, and the spillover effect is more significant than the direct effect, accounting for 74.8% of the total effect. Finally, some corresponding policy suggestions are put forward according to the above research conclusions.
引用
收藏
页码:6468 / 6497
页数:30
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?
    Ambec, Stefan
    Cohen, Mark A.
    Elgie, Stewart
    Lanoie, Paul
    [J]. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) : 2 - 22
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change adopted at COP3 in Kyoto, Japan
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-444-59517-1.00001-5, 10.1016/B9780-444-59517-1.00001-5, DOI 10.1016/B9780-444-59517-1.00001-5]
  • [4] Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States
    Beck, Thorsten
    Levine, Ross
    Levkov, Alexey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) : 1637 - 1667
  • [5] Spatial panel-data models using Stata
    Belotti, Federico
    Hughes, Gordon
    Mortari, Andrea Piano
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (01) : 139 - 180
  • [6] Global reverse supply chain redesign for household plastic waste under the emission trading scheme
    Bing, Xiaoyun
    Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline
    Chaabane, Amin
    van der Vorst, Jack
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 103 : 28 - 39
  • [7] Environmental regulation and eco-innovation: the Porter hypothesis refined
    Bitat, Abdelfeteh
    [J]. EURASIAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2018, 8 (03) : 299 - 321
  • [8] Fixed effects in unconditional quantile regression
    Borgen, Nicolai T.
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2016, 16 (02) : 403 - 415
  • [9] Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Cai, Xiqian
    Lu, Yi
    Wu, Mingqin
    Yu, Linhui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2016, 123 : 73 - 85
  • [10] The impact of the establishment of carbon emission trade exchange on carbon emission efficiency
    Chen, Jing
    Gui, Wenlin
    Huang, Yunying
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (08) : 19845 - 19859