Heterogeneous effects of Aid-for-Trade on donor exports: Why is Japan different?

被引:4
|
作者
Nishitateno, Shuhei [1 ,2 ]
Umetani, Hayato [3 ]
机构
[1] Kwansei Gakuin Univ, Sch Policy Studies, 2-1Gakuen, Sanda, Hyogo 6691337, Japan
[2] Res Inst Econ Trade & Ind, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Int Cooperat Studies, Kobe, Japan
关键词
aid-for-trade; donor export; Japan; Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimator; structural gravity equation; FOREIGN-AID; GRAVITY; RECIPIENT;
D O I
10.1111/roie.12656
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study estimates the Aid-for-Trade (AfT)-export elasticity from the donor perspective, focusing on the top-five donor countries: Japan, Germany, France, US, and UK. We find the elasticity for Japan is large, suggesting that the Japanese AfT generates a net export expansion, in contrast with the other top donors. We examine the potential mechanism behind the export creation effect of Japanese AfT using unique contract data on infrastructure-related projects worldwide. The results suggest that Japanese AfT, highly concentrated in economic infrastructure, works as an informal tying arrangement, closely linking aid to donor exports associated with capital goods for infrastructure construction.
引用
收藏
页码:1117 / 1145
页数:29
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Sectoral Aid-for-Trade and Sectoral Exports: A Seemingly Unrelated Regression Analysis
    Ghimire, Shankar
    Mukherjee, Debasri
    Alvi, Eskander
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2013, 33 (04): : 2744 - 2755
  • [2] Who Benefits from Aid for Trade? Comparing the Effects on Recipient versus Donor Exports
    Huehne, Philipp
    Meyer, Birgit
    Nunnenkamp, Peter
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2014, 50 (09): : 1275 - 1288
  • [3] Effects of Development Aid on Donor's Exports: A Case of the Czech Republic
    Dufkova, Gabriela
    Salek, Pavel
    REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2022, 22 (03) : 171 - 191
  • [5] Convertible bond announcement effects: Why is Japan different?
    Dutordoir, Marie
    Li, Hui
    Liu, Frank Hong
    Verwijmeren, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2016, 37 : 76 - 92