Sustainable functional urethral reconstruction improves early urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial

被引:1
|
作者
Jia, Zepeng [1 ]
Chen, Zeyu [2 ]
Chang, Yifan [1 ]
Wu, Cheng [3 ]
Qu, Min [1 ]
Nian, Xinwen [1 ]
Shen, Xianqi [1 ]
Zhang, Yun [1 ]
Tang, Shouyan [1 ]
Wang, Yan [1 ]
Gao, Xu [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Med Univ, Changhai Hosp, Dept Urol, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Naval Med Univ, Dept Hlth Stat, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; robot-assisted surgery; urinary continence; urinary function; sustainable functional urethral reconstruction; randomised controlled trial; #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; #uroonc; BLADDER NECK RECONSTRUCTION; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; SURGICAL MARGINS; PRESERVATION; RECOVERY; CANCER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/bju.15956
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of sustainable functional urethral reconstruction (SFUR) on early recovery of urinary continence (UC) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Patients and MethodsOverall, 96 patients with primary prostate cancer were randomised into the SFUR or standard group (n = 48 each). The primary outcome was the 1-month UC recovery. Secondary outcomes included short-term (<= 3 months) UC recovery, urinary function, micturition-related bother, perioperative complications, and oncological outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the 3-month UC recovery. Generalised estimating equations were used to compare postoperative urinary function and micturition-related bother. ResultsThe 1-month UC recovery rates, median 24-h pad weights, and median operative time in the SFUR and standard groups were 73% and 49% (P = 0.017), 0 and 47 g (P = 0.001), and 125 and 103 min (P = 0.025), respectively. The UC recovery rates in the SFUR vs standard groups were 53% vs 23% at 1 week (P = 0.003), 53% vs 32% at 2 weeks (P = 0.038), and 93% vs 77% at 3 months (P = 0.025). The median time to UC recovery in the SFUR and standard groups was 5 and 34 days, respectively (log-rank P = 0.006); multivariable Cox regression supported this result (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.79, P = 0.024). Similar results were observed when UC was defined as 0 pads/day. Urinary function (P = 0.2) and micturition-related bother (P = 0.8) were similar at all follow-up intervals. The perioperative complication rates, positive surgical margin rates, and 1-year biochemical recurrence-free survival were comparable between both groups (all P > 0.05). ConclusionSFUR resulted in earlier UC recovery without compromising postoperative urinary function. Long-term validation and multicentre studies are required to confirm the results of this novel technique.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 728
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sustainable functional urethral reconstruction: Maximizing early continence recovery in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Jia, Zepeng
    Chang, Yifan
    Wang, Yan
    Li, Jing
    Qu, Min
    Zhu, Feng
    Chen, Huan
    Lian, Bijun
    Hua, Meimian
    Sun, Yinghao
    Gao, Xu
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 8 (01) : 126 - 133
  • [2] A Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess the Benefit of Posterior Rhabdosphincter Reconstruction in Early Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Salazar, Aina
    Regis, Lucas
    Planas, Jacques
    Celma, Anna
    Santamaria, Anna
    Trilla, Enrique
    Morote, Juan
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2022, 5 (04): : 460 - 463
  • [3] Urinary continence outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Significance of anterior reconstruction
    Funajima, Keisuke
    Naito, Sei
    Fukai, Atsushi
    Narisawa, Takafumi
    Fukuhara, Hiroki
    Suenaga, Shinta
    Takai, Yuki
    Takai, Satoshi
    Yagi, Mayu
    Kanno, Hidenori
    Yamagishi, Atsushi
    Nishida, Hayato
    Tsuchiya, Norihiko
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, : 355 - 360
  • [4] Early urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in older Australian men
    Basto, Marnique Y.
    Vidyasagar, Chinni
    te Marvelde, Luc
    Freeborn, Helen
    Birch, Emma
    Landau, Adam
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Moon, Daniel
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 : 29 - 33
  • [5] Predictors of Early Continence after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Yamada, Yuta
    Fujimura, Tetsuya
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    Sugihara, Toru
    Nakagawa, Tohru
    Kume, Haruki
    Igawa, Yasuhiko
    Homma, Yukio
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2018, 10 (03) : 287 - 291
  • [6] Systematic review on urinary continence rates after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Geraghty, Keith
    Keane, Kevin
    Davis, Niall
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 193 (03) : 1603 - 1612
  • [7] Significant association between urethral length measured by magnetic resonance imaging and urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Kitamura, Kosuke
    China, Toshiyuki
    Kanayama, Mayuko
    Nagata, Masayosi
    Isotani, Shuji
    Wakumoto, Yoshiaki
    Muto, Satoru
    Ide, Hisamitsu
    Horie, Shigeo
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 7 (02) : 54 - 59
  • [8] A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Dalela, Deepansh
    Jeong, Wooju
    Prasad, Madhu-Ashni
    Sood, Akshay
    Abdollah, Firas
    Diaz, Mireya
    Karabon, Patrick
    Sammon, Jesse
    Jamil, Marcus
    Baize, Brad
    Simone, Andrea
    Menon, Mani
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (05) : 677 - 685
  • [9] Postoperative urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Nilsson, Andreas
    Wiklund, Peter N.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 40 (02): : 103 - 107
  • [10] Impact of Periurethral Inflammation on Continence Status Early After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Momozono, Hiroyuki
    Miyake, Hideaki
    Fujisawa, Masato
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2016, 30 (11) : 1207 - 1213