Enabling educational innovation through complexity leadership? Perspectives from four Dutch universities

被引:5
作者
Schophuizen, Martine [1 ,3 ]
Kelly, Aodhan [2 ]
Utama, Caitlin [4 ]
Specht, Marcus [5 ]
Kalz, Marco [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ Netherlands, Fac Educ Sci, Heerlen, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Initiat Educ Res NRO, The Hague, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Delft Univ Technol, Ctr Educ & Learning, Delft, Netherlands
[6] Heidelberg Univ Educ, Inst Arts Mus & Media, Heidelberg, Germany
[7] Open Univ Netherlands, Fac Management Sci & Technol, Heerlen, Netherlands
关键词
Higher education; Educational innovation; Leadership; Strategy; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1007/s11233-022-09105-8
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Leadership in higher can influence the structurally embedding of educational technologies in higher education institutions. However, HEIs are complex pluralistic organizational environments with loosely coupled systems, diffused power and goal ambiguity which makes governance of educational innovations a wicked problem in which they have to balance dynamic complex interactions while also setting out a clear vision and enacting this vision towards organizational goals. This paper analyses four qualitative case studies with a focus on the choices made by leaders in four Dutch universities that aim to contribute to organisational educational innovation. We investigated the data through the lens of complexity leadership theory in which three types of leadership play an important role: administrative leadership (i.e. top-down oriented), adaptive leadership (i.e. bottom-up oriented) and enabling leadership that emerges as a leadership type between administrative and adaptive leadership and contributes to governing innovation in complex environments. This study sheds light on how, in the case of HEIs as complex environments, leaders made strategic choices and followed up on them to enable the innovative potential of the organisation.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 490
页数:20
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Multilevel Boundary Crossing in a Professional Development School Partnership [J].
Akkerman, Sanne ;
Bruining, Ton .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2016, 25 (02) :240-284
[2]  
Arena MichaelJ., 2016, People and Strategy, V39, P22
[3]  
Backhouse J, 2013, KNOWL MANAG E-LEARN, V5, P345
[4]  
Birch D, 2009, AUSTRALAS J EDUC TEC, V25, P117
[5]  
COLLIS B, 2002, MODELS TECHNOLOGY CH
[6]  
Creswell JW., 2018, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, V4
[7]  
De Boer H., 2002, ADVIESRAAD WETENSCHA
[8]   Does E-learning Policy Drive Change in Higher Education?: A case study relating models of organisational change to e-learning implementation [J].
de Freitas, Sara ;
Oliver, Martin .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 27 (01) :81-95
[9]   Emerging Definitions of Leadership in Higher Education New Visions of Leadership or Same Old "Hero" Leader? [J].
Eddy, Pamela L. ;
VanDerLinden, Kim E. .
COMMUNITY COLLEGE REVIEW, 2006, 34 (01) :5-26
[10]  
Kezar A.J., 2006, RETHINKING L WORD HI