Assessing the gene silencing potential of AuNP-based approaches on conventional 2D cell culture versus 3D tumor spheroid

被引:2
|
作者
Oliveira, Beatriz B. [1 ,2 ]
Fernandes, Alexandra R. [1 ,2 ]
Baptista, Pedro Viana [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ NOVA Lisboa, UCIBIO, Fac Ciencias & Tecnol, Dept Ciencias Vida, Caparica, Portugal
[2] Univ NOVA Lisboa, Inst Hlth & Bioecon, Fac Ciencias & Tecnol, Associate Lab,i4HB, Caparica, Portugal
关键词
gold nanoparticles; gene silencing; 3D spheroids; cancer models; c-MYC; MULTIFUNCTIONAL GOLD-NANOPARTICLES; DIFFERENT SIZES; IN-VITRO; TOXICITY; CANCER; EXPRESSION; DELIVERY; MODELS; TRAFFICKING; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3389/fbioe.2024.1320729
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture using tumor spheroids provides a crucial platform for replicating tissue microenvironments. However, effective gene modulation via nanoparticle-based transfection remains a challenge, often facing delivery hurdles. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with their tailored synthesis and biocompatibility, have shown promising results in two-dimensional (2D) cultures, nevertheless, they still require a comprehensive evaluation before they can reach its full potential on 3D models. While 2D cultures offer simplicity and affordability, they lack physiological fidelity. In contrast, 3D spheroids better capture in vivo conditions, enabling the study of cell interactions and nutrient distribution. These models are essential for investigating cancer behavior, drug responses, and developmental processes. Nevertheless, transitioning from 2D to 3D models demands an understanding of altered internalization mechanisms and microenvironmental influences. This study assessed ASO-AuNP conjugates for silencing the c-MYC oncogene in 2D cultures and 3D tumor spheroids, revealing distinctions in gene silencing efficiency and highlighting the microenvironment's impact on AuNP-mediated gene modulation. Herein, we demonstrate that increasing the number of AuNPs per cell by 2.6 times, when transitioning from a 2D cell model to a 3D spheroid, allows to attain similar silencing efficiencies. Such insights advance the development of targeted gene therapies within intricate tissue-like contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3D Versus 2D Cell Culture: Implications for Electron Microscopy
    Hess, Michael W.
    Pfaller, Kristian
    Ebner, Hannes L.
    Beer, Beate
    Hekl, Daniel
    Seppi, Thomas
    ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF MODEL SYSTEMS, 2010, 96 : 649 - 670
  • [2] The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture
    Pais, Ana Sofia
    Reis, Sandra
    Laranjo, Mafalda
    Caramelo, Francisco
    Silva, Fatima
    Botelho, Maria Filomena
    Almeida-Santos, Teresa
    JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (01)
  • [3] Modeling the photodynamic effect in 2D versus 3D cell culture under normoxic and hypoxic conditions
    Kucinska, Malgorzata
    Plewinski, Adam
    Szczolko, Wojciech
    Kaczmarek, Mariusz
    Goslinski, Tomasz
    Murias, Marek
    FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2021, 162 : 309 - 326
  • [4] 3D Cell Culture-Can It Be As Popular as 2D Cell Culture?
    Sun, Miao
    Liu, An
    Yang, Xiaofu
    Gong, Jiaxing
    Yu, Mengfei
    Yao, Xinhua
    Wang, Huiming
    He, Yong
    ADVANCED NANOBIOMED RESEARCH, 2021, 1 (05):
  • [5] Fluorination on polyethylenimine allows efficient 2D and 3D cell culture gene delivery
    Lv, Jia
    Chang, Hong
    Wang, Yu
    Wang, Mingming
    Xiao, Jianru
    Zhang, Qiang
    Cheng, Yiyun
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B, 2015, 3 (04) : 642 - 650
  • [6] Comparison of 2D and 3D cell culture models for cell growth, gene expression and drug resistance
    Fontoura, Julia C.
    Viezzer, Christian
    dos Santos, Fabiana G.
    Ligabue, Rosane A.
    Weinlich, Ricardo
    Puga, Renato D.
    Antonow, Dyeison
    Severino, Patricia
    Bonorino, Cristina
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2020, 107
  • [7] The impact of 2D versus 3D quantitation of tumor bulk determination on current methods of assessing response to treatment
    Hopper, KD
    Kasales, CJ
    Eggli, KD
    TenHave, TR
    Belman, NM
    Potok, PS
    VanSlyke, MA
    Olt, GJ
    Close, P
    Lipton, A
    Harvey, HA
    Hartzel, JS
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1996, 20 (06) : 930 - 937
  • [8] Is It Time to Start Transitioning From 2D to 3D Cell Culture?
    Jensen, Caleb
    Teng, Yong
    FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCES, 2020, 7
  • [9] Comparing the BAD Protein Interactomes in 2D and 3D Cell Culture Using Proximity Labeling
    Pirayeshfard, Leila
    Luo, Shu
    Githaka, John Maringa
    Saini, Arashdeep
    Touret, Nicolas
    Goping, Ing Swie
    Julien, Olivier
    JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2024, 23 (08) : 3433 - 3443
  • [10] Simultaneous 2D and 3D cell culture array for multicellular geometry, drug discovery and tumor microenvironment reconstruction
    Li, Shun
    Yang, Kaifu
    Chen, Xiangyan
    Zhu, Xinglong
    Zhou, Hanying
    Li, Ping
    Chen, Yu
    Jiang, Ying
    Li, Tingting
    Qin, Xiang
    Yang, Hong
    Wu, Chunhui
    Ji, Bao
    You, Fengming
    Liu, Yiyao
    BIOFABRICATION, 2021, 13 (04)