Embedding simulation in genetic counselor education from the first week of training: Learning outcomes, standardized clients, and students' satisfaction

被引:1
作者
Jacobs, Chris [1 ,2 ]
McEwen, Alison [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Grad Sch Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Surrey, Sch Hlth Sci, Guildford, England
关键词
education; novice/ student genetic counselor; simulation-based learning; standardized clients; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1002/jgc4.1857
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Health professional educators routinely utilize simulation to prepare students for practice. However, there is little evidence to show whether simulation enhances learning for genetic counseling students. This study aimed to (i) develop simulation learning outcomes and standardized clients for genetic counselor student education and (ii) evaluate students' experiences of learning from face-to-face and virtual simulation in the first week of training in an Australasian master of genetic counseling program. Using the principles of co-design, eight experienced genetic counselors from across Australasia attended an online discussion and one-to-one meetings to develop simulation learning outcomes and build detailed authentic standardized clients. Six learning outcomes were identified: establishing an effective counseling relationship, eliciting information, assessing need, delivering difficult news and helping clients cope with complex emotions, effective communication and facilitating adaptation. Standardized clients were mapped to the learning outcomes and other requirements of the program. Between 2019 and 2022, 106 first year students participated in face-to-face or virtual simulation workshops with two standardized clients on Day 5 of their training. Following the experience, 103 students completed an anonymous survey using a modified version of a validated satisfaction with simulation scale (n = 49 face-to-face in 2019 and 2020 and n = 54 virtual in 2021 and 2022). Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. Mean satisfaction overall was 95.9% (SD 3.5), 96.2 (SD 4.0) face-to-face, and 95.8 (SD 3.7) virtual. Overall, responses indicated that simulation-based learning and working with standardized clients was a valuable learning experience (100%), developed communication skills and created a sense of reality (99%). For a minority of participants (n = 4), the simulation was too challenging. Key learning related to consolidation of counseling skills, reflective practice, and preparation for clinical placement. In conclusion, exposing novice student genetic counselors to authentic clinical scenarios using standardized clients in face-to-face or virtual classrooms enhanced clinical learning.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   The Global State of the Genetic Counseling Profession [J].
Abacan, MaryAnn ;
Alsubaie, Lamia ;
Barlow-Stewart, Kristine ;
Caanen, Beppy ;
Cordier, Christophe ;
Courtney, Eliza ;
Davoine, Emeline ;
Edwards, Janice ;
Elackatt, Niby J. ;
Gardiner, Kate ;
Guan, Yue ;
Huang, Lian-Hua ;
Malmgren, Charlotta Ingvoldstad ;
Kejriwal, Sahil ;
Kim, Hyon J. ;
Lambert, Deborah ;
Lantigua-Cruz, Paulina Araceli ;
Lee, Juliana M. H. ;
Lodahl, Marianne ;
Lunde, Ashild ;
Macaulay, Shelley ;
Macciocca, Ivan ;
Margarit, Sonia ;
Middleton, Anna ;
Moldovan, Ramona ;
Ngeow, Joanne ;
Obregon-Tito, Alexandra J. ;
Ormond, Kelly E. ;
Paneque, Milena ;
Powell, Karen ;
Sanghavi, Kunal ;
Scotcher, Diana ;
Scott, Jenna ;
Juhe, Clara Serra ;
Shkedi-Rafid, Shiri ;
Wessels, Tina-Marie ;
Yoon, Sook-Yee ;
Wicklund, Catherine .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 (02) :183-197
[2]   Evaluating the Use of Simulation with Beginning Nursing Students [J].
Alfes, Celeste M. .
JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2011, 50 (02) :89-93
[3]   Training Methods for Delivering Difficult News in Genetic Counseling and Genetics Residency Training Programs [J].
Andoni, Laila ;
Hobson, Wendy L. ;
Carey, John C. ;
Dent, Karin M. .
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2018, 27 (06) :1497-1505
[4]  
Bambini Deborah, 2009, Nurs Educ Perspect, V30, P79
[5]  
Blackford J., 2015, Int J Pract-Based Learn Health Social Care, P77, DOI DOI 10.18552/IJPBLHSC.V3I1.209
[6]   Simulation Can Contribute a Part of Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy Clinical Education Two Randomized Trials [J].
Blackstock, Felicity C. ;
Watson, Kathryn M. ;
Morris, Norman R. ;
Jones, Anne ;
Wright, Anthony ;
McMeeken, Joan M. ;
Rivett, Darren A. ;
O'Connor, Vivienne ;
Peterson, Raymond F. ;
Haines, Terry P. ;
Watson, Geoffrey ;
Jull, Gwendolen Anne .
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2013, 8 (01) :32-42
[7]   Strengths and Weaknesses of Simulated and Real Patients in the Teaching of Skills to Medical Students: A Review [J].
Bokken, Lonneke ;
Rethans, Jan-Joost ;
Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A. ;
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. .
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2008, 3 (03) :161-169
[8]   Technology-Enhanced Simulation for Health Professions Education A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Cook, David A. ;
Hatala, Rose ;
Brydges, Ryan ;
Zendejas, Benjamin ;
Szostek, Jason H. ;
Wang, Amy T. ;
Erwin, Patricia J. ;
Hamstra, Stanley J. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 306 (09) :978-988
[9]   Enhancing Clinical Reasoning Through Simulation Debriefing: A Multisite Study [J].
Forneris, Susan G. ;
Neal, Diana O. ;
Tiffany, Jone ;
Kuehn, Mary Beth ;
Meyer, Heidi M. ;
Blazovich, Linda M. ;
Holland, Ann E. ;
Smerillo, Melanie .
NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 36 (05) :304-310
[10]  
Hayden JK, 2014, J NURS REGUL, V5, pS3