Embedding simulation in genetic counselor education from the first week of training: Learning outcomes, standardized clients, and students' satisfaction

被引:1
作者
Jacobs, Chris [1 ,2 ]
McEwen, Alison [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Grad Sch Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Surrey, Sch Hlth Sci, Guildford, England
关键词
education; novice/ student genetic counselor; simulation-based learning; standardized clients; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1002/jgc4.1857
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Health professional educators routinely utilize simulation to prepare students for practice. However, there is little evidence to show whether simulation enhances learning for genetic counseling students. This study aimed to (i) develop simulation learning outcomes and standardized clients for genetic counselor student education and (ii) evaluate students' experiences of learning from face-to-face and virtual simulation in the first week of training in an Australasian master of genetic counseling program. Using the principles of co-design, eight experienced genetic counselors from across Australasia attended an online discussion and one-to-one meetings to develop simulation learning outcomes and build detailed authentic standardized clients. Six learning outcomes were identified: establishing an effective counseling relationship, eliciting information, assessing need, delivering difficult news and helping clients cope with complex emotions, effective communication and facilitating adaptation. Standardized clients were mapped to the learning outcomes and other requirements of the program. Between 2019 and 2022, 106 first year students participated in face-to-face or virtual simulation workshops with two standardized clients on Day 5 of their training. Following the experience, 103 students completed an anonymous survey using a modified version of a validated satisfaction with simulation scale (n = 49 face-to-face in 2019 and 2020 and n = 54 virtual in 2021 and 2022). Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. Mean satisfaction overall was 95.9% (SD 3.5), 96.2 (SD 4.0) face-to-face, and 95.8 (SD 3.7) virtual. Overall, responses indicated that simulation-based learning and working with standardized clients was a valuable learning experience (100%), developed communication skills and created a sense of reality (99%). For a minority of participants (n = 4), the simulation was too challenging. Key learning related to consolidation of counseling skills, reflective practice, and preparation for clinical placement. In conclusion, exposing novice student genetic counselors to authentic clinical scenarios using standardized clients in face-to-face or virtual classrooms enhanced clinical learning.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] The Global State of the Genetic Counseling Profession
    Abacan, MaryAnn
    Alsubaie, Lamia
    Barlow-Stewart, Kristine
    Caanen, Beppy
    Cordier, Christophe
    Courtney, Eliza
    Davoine, Emeline
    Edwards, Janice
    Elackatt, Niby J.
    Gardiner, Kate
    Guan, Yue
    Huang, Lian-Hua
    Malmgren, Charlotta Ingvoldstad
    Kejriwal, Sahil
    Kim, Hyon J.
    Lambert, Deborah
    Lantigua-Cruz, Paulina Araceli
    Lee, Juliana M. H.
    Lodahl, Marianne
    Lunde, Ashild
    Macaulay, Shelley
    Macciocca, Ivan
    Margarit, Sonia
    Middleton, Anna
    Moldovan, Ramona
    Ngeow, Joanne
    Obregon-Tito, Alexandra J.
    Ormond, Kelly E.
    Paneque, Milena
    Powell, Karen
    Sanghavi, Kunal
    Scotcher, Diana
    Scott, Jenna
    Juhe, Clara Serra
    Shkedi-Rafid, Shiri
    Wessels, Tina-Marie
    Yoon, Sook-Yee
    Wicklund, Catherine
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 (02) : 183 - 197
  • [2] Evaluating the Use of Simulation with Beginning Nursing Students
    Alfes, Celeste M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2011, 50 (02) : 89 - 93
  • [3] Training Methods for Delivering Difficult News in Genetic Counseling and Genetics Residency Training Programs
    Andoni, Laila
    Hobson, Wendy L.
    Carey, John C.
    Dent, Karin M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2018, 27 (06) : 1497 - 1505
  • [4] Bambini Deborah, 2009, Nurs Educ Perspect, V30, P79
  • [5] Blackford J., 2015, International Journal of Practice‐Based Learning in Health and Social Care, P77, DOI DOI 10.18552/IJPBLHSC.V3I1.209
  • [6] Simulation Can Contribute a Part of Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy Clinical Education Two Randomized Trials
    Blackstock, Felicity C.
    Watson, Kathryn M.
    Morris, Norman R.
    Jones, Anne
    Wright, Anthony
    McMeeken, Joan M.
    Rivett, Darren A.
    O'Connor, Vivienne
    Peterson, Raymond F.
    Haines, Terry P.
    Watson, Geoffrey
    Jull, Gwendolen Anne
    [J]. SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2013, 8 (01): : 32 - 42
  • [7] Strengths and Weaknesses of Simulated and Real Patients in the Teaching of Skills to Medical Students: A Review
    Bokken, Lonneke
    Rethans, Jan-Joost
    Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A.
    van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
    [J]. SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2008, 3 (03) : 161 - 169
  • [8] Technology-Enhanced Simulation for Health Professions Education A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Cook, David A.
    Hatala, Rose
    Brydges, Ryan
    Zendejas, Benjamin
    Szostek, Jason H.
    Wang, Amy T.
    Erwin, Patricia J.
    Hamstra, Stanley J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 306 (09): : 978 - 988
  • [9] Enhancing Clinical Reasoning Through Simulation Debriefing: A Multisite Study
    Forneris, Susan G.
    Neal, Diana O.
    Tiffany, Jone
    Kuehn, Mary Beth
    Meyer, Heidi M.
    Blazovich, Linda M.
    Holland, Ann E.
    Smerillo, Melanie
    [J]. NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 36 (05) : 304 - 310
  • [10] Hayden JK, 2014, J NURS REGUL, V5, pS3