Hierarchical Precedential Constraint

被引:5
作者
van Woerkom, Wijnand [1 ]
Grossi, Davide [2 ,3 ]
Prakken, Henry [1 ,4 ]
Verheij, Bart [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Informat & Comp Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Bernoulli Inst Math CS & AI, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Ctr Law & Econ, Inst Log Language & Computat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Fac Law, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, ICAIL 2023 | 2023年
关键词
case-based reasoning; precedential constraint; factors; factor hierarchy; explainable artificial intelligence; ARGUMENTATION;
D O I
10.1145/3594536.3595154
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In recent work, theories of case-based legal reasoning have been applied to the development of explainable artificial intelligence methods, through the analogy of training examples as previously decided cases. One such theory is that of precedential constraint. A downside of this theory with respect to this application is that it performs single-step reasoning, moving directly from the case base to an outcome. For this reason we propose a generalization of the theory of precedential constraint which allows multi-step reasoning, moving from the case base through a series of intermediate legal concepts before arriving at an outcome. Our generalization revolves around the notion of factor hierarchy, so we call this hierarchical precedential constraint. We present the theory, demonstrate its applicability to case-based legal reasoning, and perform a preliminary analysis of its theoretical properties.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 342
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Aleven V., 1997, P 6 INT C LAW MELBOU, P170
[2]  
Aleven V, 1997, teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
[3]   REASONING WITH CASES AND HYPOTHETICALS IN HYPO [J].
ASHLEY, KD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1991, 34 (06) :753-796
[4]  
Brewka G., 2013, P 23 INT JOINT C ART, P803
[5]  
Canavotto I., 2022, LEGAL KNOWLEDGE INFO, V362, P23, DOI [10.3233/FAIA220445, DOI 10.3233/FAIA220445]
[6]   Data-Empowered Argumentation for Dialectically Explainable Predictions [J].
Cocarascu, Oana ;
Stylianou, Andria ;
Cyras, Kristijonas ;
Toni, Francesca .
ECAI 2020: 24TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 325 :2449-2456
[7]   Explanations by arbitrated argumentative dispute [J].
Cyras, Kristijonas ;
Birch, David ;
Guo, Yike ;
Toni, Francesca ;
Dulay, Rajvinder ;
Turvey, Sally ;
Greenberg, Daniel ;
Hapuarachchi, Tharindi .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 127 :141-156
[8]   Explanation for Case-Based Reasoning via Abstract Argumentation [J].
Cyras, Kristijonas ;
Satoh, Ken ;
Toni, Francesca .
COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, 2016, 287 :243-254
[9]  
Gottwald Siegfried, 2022, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
[10]   Reasoning with dimensions and magnitudes [J].
Horty, John .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, 2019, 27 (03) :309-345