A comprehensive survey and analysis of international drinking water regulations for inorganic chemicals with comparisons to the World Health Organization's drinking-water guidelines

被引:8
作者
Mitchell, Erika J. [1 ]
Frisbie, Seth H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Better Life Labs Inc, Calais, VT USA
[2] Norwich Univ, Dept Chem & Biochem, Northfield, VT 05663 USA
关键词
COPPER; GROUNDWATER; MANGANESE; TOXICITY; EXPOSURE; QUALITY; ANTIMONY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0287937
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) has published criteria for determining the quality of drinking water since 1958. Since 1984, these criteria were termed "guidelines" to emphasize that they are not national standards, but rather guidelines for nations to develop their own national standards, which may take into account local environmental, social, economic, and cultural conditions. When calculating guideline values (GVs), the WHO reviews the toxicological literature, calculates a health-based value (HBV), and determines whether the HBV should be adopted as a GV. The WHO also considers aesthetic aspects of drinking water quality, such as taste and the staining of plumbing fixtures, and additionally supplies aesthetic values (AVs) for certain drinking water contaminants. There is no central registry for national drinking water standards, so the degree of variation of national drinking water standards is not known.MethodsWe examined standards, guidelines, and background documents for all inorganic contaminants published by the WHO from 1958-2022. We also searched for national drinking water standards for all independent countries.ResultsWe found the WHO currently has 16 GVs, six HBVs without GVs, and six AVs without HBVs or GVs for inorganic drinking water contaminants, excluding disinfection agents and their byproducts. More than half of the point of departure studies used to support these values were published in 2005 or earlier. Ninety-eight percent of the world's population lives in jurisdictions with drinking water standards, and 14 countries directly link their national standards to the current WHO's drinking water guidelines. Lack of transparency (standards available only through purchase) and typographical errors are common problems, especially for resource-limited countries.ConclusionsThe WHO drinking water guidelines are crucially important for drinking water safety; they are used for guidance or as official standards throughout the world. It is crucial that they be based on the best available science.
引用
收藏
页数:64
相关论文
共 357 条
[1]  
Afghan National Standards Authority, 2013, ANSA/TC 14. AS:2012
[2]  
Aliev S., 2010, RAPID ASSESSMENT DRI
[3]   Benchmark dose analysis of developmental toxicity in rats exposed to boric acid [J].
Allen, BC ;
Strong, PL ;
Price, CJ ;
Hubbard, SA ;
Daston, GP .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 32 (02) :194-204
[4]  
Amandala Newspaper, 2009, Belize water analyst says there is need for continued monitoring
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, S.I. no. 122 of 2014
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Quality of water for human consumption in compliance with the provisions of Directive 98/83/ΕK of the Council of the ΕEuropean Union, of 3rd Νoember 1998 as amended by the Directive (ΕΕ)
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Nitrate and Nitrite in Drinking-Water, DOI DOI 10.1159/000225441
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Modifica el decreto n 735, de 1969, reglamento de los servicios de agua destinados al consumo humano
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1999, SanniH 10-124 RB 99