Referral rate and false-positive rates in a hearing screening program among high-risk newborns

被引:4
作者
Thangavelu, Kruthika [1 ]
Martakis, Kyriakos [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Feldmann, Silke [6 ]
Roth, Bernhard [5 ,7 ]
Lang-Roth, Ruth [6 ]
机构
[1] Philipps Univ Marburg, Univ Hosp Marburg, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Baldingerstr, D-35043 Marburg, Germany
[2] Justus Liebig Univ Giessen, Dept Pediat Neurol Social Pediat & Epileptol, Feulgenstr 10-12, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Giessen, Feulgenstr 10-12, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
[4] Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Kerpener Str 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[5] Univ Hosp Cologne, Kerpener Str 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[6] Univ Cologne, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Kerpener Str 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[7] Fac Med, Dept Neonatol, Kerpener Str 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
关键词
Hearing screening; Newborn; False-positivity; High-risk newborns; AABR; BRAIN-STEM-RESPONSE; EVOKED-OTOACOUSTIC-EMISSIONS; PROTOCOLS; DELIVERY; LANGUAGE; OUTCOMES; CHILDREN; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1007/s00405-023-07978-y
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
AimMore studies exploring referral rates and false-positive rates are needed to make hearing screening programs in newborns better and cost-effective. Our aim was to study the referral and false-positivity rates among high-risk newborns in our hearing screening program and to analyze the factors potentially associated with false-positive hearing screening test results.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was done among the newborns hospitalized at a university hospital from January 2009 to December 2014 that underwent hearing screening with a two-staged AABR screening protocol. Referral rates and false-positivity rates were calculated and possible risk factors for false-positivity were analyzed.Results4512 newborns were screened for hearing loss in the neonatology department. The referral rate for the two-staged AABR-only screening was 3.8% with false-positivity being 2.9%. Our study showed that the higher the birthweight or gestational age of the newborn, the lower the odds of the hearing screening results being false-positive, and the higher the chronological age of the infant at the time of screening, the higher the odds of the results being false-positive. Our study did not show a clear association between the mode of delivery or gender and false-positivity.ConclusionAmong high-risk infants, prematurity and low-birthweight increased the rate of false-positivity in the hearing screening, and the chronological age at the time of the test seems to be significantly associated with false-positivity.
引用
收藏
页码:4455 / 4465
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Otoacoustic emissions in newborn hearing screening: A systematic review of the effects of different protocols on test outcomes [J].
Akinpelu, Olubunmi V. ;
Peleva, Emilia ;
Funnel, W. Robert J. ;
Daniel, Sam J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2014, 78 (05) :711-717
[2]   NICU-only versus universal screening for newborn hearing loss: Population audit [J].
Barker, Melinda J. ;
Hughes, Elizabeth K. ;
Wake, Melissa .
JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2013, 49 (01) :E74-E79
[3]   Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs [J].
Benito-Orejas, J. I. ;
Ramirez, B. ;
Morais, D. ;
Alamaraz, A. ;
Fernandez-Calvoc, J. L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2008, 72 (08) :1193-1201
[4]   Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs [J].
Busa, Jackie ;
Harrison, Judy ;
Chappell, Jodie ;
Yoshinaga-Itano, Christine ;
Grimes, Alison ;
Brookhouser, Patrick E. ;
Epstein, Stephen ;
Mehl, Albert ;
Vohr, Betty ;
Gravel, Judith ;
Roush, Jack ;
Widen, Judith ;
Benedict, Beth S. ;
Scoggins, Bobbie ;
King, Michelle ;
Pippins, Linda ;
Savage, David H. .
PEDIATRICS, 2007, 120 (04) :898-921
[5]   Newborn hearing screening in Queensland 2009-2011: Comparison of hearing screening and diagnostic audiological assessment between term and preterm infants [J].
Calcutt, Trent L. ;
Dornan, Dimity ;
Beswick, Rachael ;
Tudehope, David I. .
JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2016, 52 (11) :995-1003
[6]   Comparison of newborn hearing screening results between well babies and neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit for more than 5 days: Analysis based on the national database in Korea for 9 years [J].
Chang, Jiwon ;
Oh, Seung-Ha ;
Park, Su-Kyoung .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (06)
[7]   Is Early Intervention Effective in Improving Spoken Language Outcomes of Children With Congenital Hearing Loss? [J].
Ching, Teresa Y. C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 24 (03) :345-348
[8]   A comparison of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem responses for pre-discharge neonatal hearing screening [J].
Clarke, P ;
Iqbal, M ;
Mitchell, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2003, 42 (08) :443-447
[9]   Minimizing false-positives in universal newborn hearing screening: A simple solution [J].
Clemens, CJ ;
Davis, SA .
PEDIATRICS, 2001, 107 (03) :E29
[10]   The false-positive in universal newborn hearing screening [J].
Clemens, CJ ;
Davis, SA ;
Bailey, AR .
PEDIATRICS, 2000, 106 (01) :E7