Prophylactic platelet transfusion and risk of bleeding associated with ultrasound-guided central venous access in patients with severe thrombocytopenia

被引:4
作者
Zarama, Virginia [1 ,2 ]
Revelo-Noguera, Jorge [2 ]
Quintero, Jaime A. [3 ]
Manzano, Ramiro [3 ]
Uribe-Buritica, Francisco L. [3 ]
Carvajal, Daniel F. [2 ]
Ochoa, Laura M. [2 ]
Valencia-Orozco, Andrea [3 ]
Sanchez, Alvaro I. [3 ,4 ]
Ospina-Tascon, Gustavo A. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Valle Lili, Dept Emergency Med, Cali, Colombia
[2] Univ Icesi, Fac Ciencias Salud, Cali, Colombia
[3] Fdn Valle Lili, Ctr Invest Clin CIC, Cali, Colombia
[4] Fdn Valle Lili, Dept Surg, Div Thorac Surg, Cali, Colombia
[5] Fdn Valle Lili, Dept Intens Care, Cali, Colombia
[6] Univ Icesi, Translat Res Lab Crit Care Med TransLab CCM, Cali, Colombia
关键词
CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINE; VEIN CATHETERIZATION; LINE PLACEMENT; COMPLICATIONS; CANNULATION; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; IMPUTATION; DISORDERS; GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.1111/acem.14651
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundReported risk of bleeding complications after central catheter access in patients with thrombocytopenia is highly variable. Current guidelines recommend routine prophylactic platelet (PLT) transfusion before central venous catheter placement in patients with severe thrombocytopenia. Nevertheless, the strength of such recommendations is weak and supported by observational studies including few patients with very low PLT counts (<20 x 10(9)/L). This study aims to assess the risk of bleeding complications related to using or not using prophylactic PLT transfusion before ultrasound-guided central venous access in patients with very low PLT counts. MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients with very low PLT counts (<20 x 10(9)/L) subjected to ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization between January 2011 and November 2019 in a university hospital. Bleeding complications were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. A multivariate logistic regression was conducted to assess the risk of major and minor bleeding complications comparing patients who did or did not receive prophylactic PLT transfusion for the procedure. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to handle missing data. A two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsAmong 221 patients with very low PLT counts, 72 received prophylactic PLT transfusions while 149 did not. Baseline characteristics were similar between transfused and nontransfused patients. No major bleeding events were identified, while minor bleeding events were recognized in 35.7% of patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no significant differences in bleeding complications between patients who received prophylactic PLT transfusions and those who did not (odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.45-1.55, p = 0.567). Additional complete case and sensitivity analyses yielded results similar to those of the main analysis. ConclusionsIn this single-center retrospective cohort study of ultrasound-guided central venous access in patients with very low PLT counts, no major bleeding was identified, and prophylactic PLT transfusions did not significantly decrease minor bleeding events.
引用
收藏
页码:644 / 652
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Risk of bleeding after ultrasound-guided jugular central venous catheter insertion in severely thrombocytopenic oncologic patients [J].
AlRstum, Zain A. ;
Huynh, Tam T. ;
Huang, Steven Y. ;
Pisimisis, George T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 217 (01) :133-137
[3]  
Barrera R, 1996, CANCER, V78, P2025, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961101)78:9<2025::AID-CNCR26>3.3.CO
[4]  
2-T
[5]   Development of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Mitchell, Sandra A. ;
Clauser, Steven B. ;
Minasian, Lori M. ;
Dueck, Amylou C. ;
Mendoza, Tito R. ;
Hay, Jennifer ;
Atkinson, Thomas M. ;
Abernethy, Amy P. ;
Bruner, Deborah W. ;
Cleeland, Charles S. ;
Sloan, Jeff A. ;
Chilukuri, Ram ;
Baumgartner, Paul ;
Denicoff, Andrea ;
St Germain, Diane ;
O'Mara, Ann M. ;
Chen, Alice ;
Kelaghan, Joseph ;
Bennett, Antonia V. ;
Sit, Laura ;
Rogak, Lauren ;
Barz, Allison ;
Paul, Diane B. ;
Schrag, Deborah .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2014, 106 (09)
[6]   A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures [J].
Collins, LM ;
Schafer, JL ;
Kam, CM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2001, 6 (04) :330-351
[7]   Sensitivity analysis for clinical trials with missing continuous outcome data using controlled multiple imputation: A practical guide [J].
Cro, Suzie ;
Morris, Tim P. ;
Kenward, Michael G. ;
Carpenter, James R. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (21) :2815-2842
[8]   Coagulation Disorders in Patients with Cancer: Nontunneled Central Venous Catheter Placement with US Guidance-A Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis [J].
Della Vigna, Paolo ;
Monfardini, Lorenzo ;
Bonomo, Guido ;
Curigliano, Giuseppe ;
Agazzi, Alberto ;
Bellomi, Massimo ;
Orsi, Franco .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 253 (01) :249-252
[9]   Invasive line placement in critically ill patients: Do hemostatic defects matter? [J].
DeLoughery, TG ;
Liebler, JM ;
Simonds, V ;
Goodnight, SH .
TRANSFUSION, 1996, 36 (09) :827-831
[10]   Central venous catheter placement in patients with disorders of hemostasis [J].
Doerfler, ME ;
Kaufman, B ;
Goldenberg, AS .
CHEST, 1996, 110 (01) :185-188