Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on walking and balance ability in Parkinson's patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Zhang, Xinxin [1 ]
Jing, Feiyue [1 ]
Liu, Yu'ang [1 ]
Tang, Jinyong [1 ]
Hua, Xianfeng [1 ]
Zhu, Jialin [1 ]
Tuo, Haowen [1 ]
Lin, Qihan [1 ]
Gao, Pincao [1 ]
Liu, Weiguo [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Normal Univ, Coll Phys Educ & Hlth, Guilin, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
non-invasive brain stimulation; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; transcranial direct current stimulation; Parkinson's disease; meta-analysis; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS; MOTOR CORTEX; DISEASE; GAIT; RTMS; DISORDERS; EFFICACY; SIGNS;
D O I
10.3389/fnagi.2022.1065126
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate and contrast the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), including repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), on walking and balance ability in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane, CNKI, and Chinese WanFang databases were searched up to June 2022. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias guidelines, and the standardized mean differences (SMD) or mean differences (MD) for each outcome were calculated.Results: Among 32 eligible studies, including 1,586 participants were analyzed in this meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that NIBS was effective in improving UPDRS-III scores (MD = -2.07; 95% CI, -2.62 to -1.53; P < 0.00001; I-2 = 6%) and variables associated with the ability of walk such as step width (SMD = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.16-0.55; P = 0.0005; I-2 = 38%), cadence (SMD = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.55; P = 0.02; I-2 = 25%), and 6MWT (MD = 62.86; 95% CI, 39.43-86.29; P < 0.00001; I-2 = 0%). In subgroup analyses across intervention types, UPDRS-III scores (rTMS: MD = -2.54; 95% CI, -3.16 to -1.92; P < 0.00001; I-2 = 0%; tDCS: MD = -1.20; 95% CI, -1.99 to -0.40; P = 0.003; I-2 = 0%) and TUGT time (rTMS: MD = -4.11; 95% CI, -4.74 to -3.47; P < 0.00001; I-2 = 0%; tDCS: MD = -0.84; 95% CI, -1.48 to -0.21; P = 0.009; I-2 = 0%) significantly improved. Moreover, our results also showed that compared to tDCS, rTMS was more significant in improving UPDRS-III scores and TUGT time (p < 0.05).Conclusion: NIBS benefits some walking ability variables but not balance ability in 36 patients with PD. The rTMS significantly improved UPDRS-III scores and TUGT time compared to tDCS. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal protocol and to illuminate effects based on the ideal target brain regions, stimulation intensity, timing, and type of intervention.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Non-invasive brain stimulation combined with psychosocial intervention for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jiali He
    Yiling Tang
    Jingxia Lin
    Guy Faulkner
    Hector W. H. Tsang
    Sunny H. W. Chan
    BMC Psychiatry, 22
  • [32] Non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qi, Li
    Wang, Shaoyang
    Li, Xiaoming
    Yu, Yue
    Wang, Wenjia
    Li, Qianqian
    Tian, Yanghua
    Bai, Tongjian
    Wang, Kai
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2024, 178 : 378 - 387
  • [33] Non-invasive brain stimulation for negative symptoms in schizophrenia: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Osoegawa, Caio
    Gomes, July Silveira
    Grigolon, Ruth Bartelli
    Brietzke, Elisa
    Gadelha, Ary
    Lacerda, Acioly L. T.
    Dias, Alvaro Machado
    Cordeiro, Quirino
    Laranjeira, Ronaldo
    de Jesus, Danilo
    Daskalakis, Zafiris Jeff
    Brunelin, Jerome
    Cordes, Joachim
    Trevizol, Alisson Paulino
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2018, 197 : 34 - 44
  • [34] Betting on Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation to Treat Gambling Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Del Mauro, Lilia
    Vergallito, Alessandra
    Gattavara, Gaia
    Juris, Lucrezia
    Gallucci, Alessia
    Vedani, Anna
    Cappelletti, Laura
    Farneti, Pietro Maria
    Lauro, Leonor. J. Romero J.
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (04)
  • [35] Non-invasive brain stimulation for borderline personality disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Mohamed Ezzat M. Mansour
    Khalid Radwan Alsaadany
    Mohamed Awad E. Ahmed
    Ahmed Ezzat Elmetwalli
    Ibrahim Serag
    Annals of General Psychiatry, 24 (1)
  • [36] Non-invasive brain stimulation combined with psychosocial intervention for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    He, Jiali
    Tang, Yiling
    Lin, Jingxia
    Faulkner, Guy
    Tsang, Hector W. H.
    Chan, Sunny H. W.
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [37] Effects of vibratory stimulation on balance and gait in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Marazzi, Silvia
    Kiper, Pawel
    Palmer, Katie
    Agostini, Michela
    Turolla, Andrea
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2021, 57 (02) : 254 - 264
  • [38] Comparative motor effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques in patients with Parkinson's disease: A network meta-analysis
    Liu, Xuan
    Li, Lei
    Liu, Ye
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (39) : E34960
  • [39] Effectiveness of Deep Brain Stimulation in Improving Balance in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Morton, Amy
    Fraser, Holly
    Green, Chloe
    Drovandi, Aaron
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 186 : 242 - 251.e3
  • [40] Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) for executive function on subjects with ADHD: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Peng, Lihong
    Tian, Liyan
    Wang, Tiantian
    Wang, Qiu
    Li, Na
    Zhou, Hui
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):