Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on walking and balance ability in Parkinson's patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Zhang, Xinxin [1 ]
Jing, Feiyue [1 ]
Liu, Yu'ang [1 ]
Tang, Jinyong [1 ]
Hua, Xianfeng [1 ]
Zhu, Jialin [1 ]
Tuo, Haowen [1 ]
Lin, Qihan [1 ]
Gao, Pincao [1 ]
Liu, Weiguo [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Normal Univ, Coll Phys Educ & Hlth, Guilin, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
non-invasive brain stimulation; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; transcranial direct current stimulation; Parkinson's disease; meta-analysis; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS; MOTOR CORTEX; DISEASE; GAIT; RTMS; DISORDERS; EFFICACY; SIGNS;
D O I
10.3389/fnagi.2022.1065126
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate and contrast the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), including repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), on walking and balance ability in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane, CNKI, and Chinese WanFang databases were searched up to June 2022. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias guidelines, and the standardized mean differences (SMD) or mean differences (MD) for each outcome were calculated.Results: Among 32 eligible studies, including 1,586 participants were analyzed in this meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that NIBS was effective in improving UPDRS-III scores (MD = -2.07; 95% CI, -2.62 to -1.53; P < 0.00001; I-2 = 6%) and variables associated with the ability of walk such as step width (SMD = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.16-0.55; P = 0.0005; I-2 = 38%), cadence (SMD = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.55; P = 0.02; I-2 = 25%), and 6MWT (MD = 62.86; 95% CI, 39.43-86.29; P < 0.00001; I-2 = 0%). In subgroup analyses across intervention types, UPDRS-III scores (rTMS: MD = -2.54; 95% CI, -3.16 to -1.92; P < 0.00001; I-2 = 0%; tDCS: MD = -1.20; 95% CI, -1.99 to -0.40; P = 0.003; I-2 = 0%) and TUGT time (rTMS: MD = -4.11; 95% CI, -4.74 to -3.47; P < 0.00001; I-2 = 0%; tDCS: MD = -0.84; 95% CI, -1.48 to -0.21; P = 0.009; I-2 = 0%) significantly improved. Moreover, our results also showed that compared to tDCS, rTMS was more significant in improving UPDRS-III scores and TUGT time (p < 0.05).Conclusion: NIBS benefits some walking ability variables but not balance ability in 36 patients with PD. The rTMS significantly improved UPDRS-III scores and TUGT time compared to tDCS. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal protocol and to illuminate effects based on the ideal target brain regions, stimulation intensity, timing, and type of intervention.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effects of add-on non-invasive brain stimulation in fibromyalgia: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials
    Hou, Wen-Hsuan
    Wang, Tzu-Ya
    Kang, Jiunn-Horng
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 55 (08) : 1507 - 1517
  • [22] Effects of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Hereditary Ataxia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Liu, Ye
    Ma, Yiming
    Zhang, Jing
    Yan, Xuejing
    Ouyang, Yi
    CEREBELLUM, 2024, 23 (04) : 1614 - 1625
  • [23] Motor function improvement and acceptability of non-invasive brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease: a Bayesian network analysis
    Qiu, Youjia
    Yin, Ziqian
    Wang, Menghan
    Duan, Aojie
    Xie, Minjia
    Wu, Jiang
    Wang, Zhong
    Chen, Gang
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [24] A meta-analysis of the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on obsessive-compulsive disorder
    Gao, Tangyu
    Du, Jian
    Tian, Shiqi
    Liu, Wei
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2022, 312
  • [25] Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on motor function after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Jian-Min
    Li, Xiao-Lu
    Pan, Qin-He
    Yang, Ye
    Xu, Sen-Ming
    Xu, Jian-Wen
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [26] Can visual cortex non-invasive brain stimulation improve normal visual function? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bello, Umar M.
    Wang, Jingying
    Park, Adela S. Y.
    Tan, Ken W. S.
    Cheung, Blossom W. S.
    Thompson, Benjamin
    Cheong, Allen M. Y.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [27] The effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on executive functioning in healthy controls: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Boer, Nina S.
    Schluter, Renee S.
    Daams, Joost G.
    van der Werf, Ysbrand D.
    Goudriaan, Anna E.
    van Holst, Ruth J.
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2021, 125 : 122 - 147
  • [28] Effects of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Headache Intensity and Frequency of Headache Attacks in Patients With Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Feng, Yali
    Zhang, Bingbing
    Zhang, Jiaqi
    Yin, Ying
    HEADACHE, 2019, 59 (09): : 1436 - 1447
  • [29] Does non-invasive brain stimulation reduce essential tremor? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kang, Nyeonju
    Cauraugh, James H.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09):
  • [30] Non-invasive brain stimulation combined with psychosocial intervention for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    He, Jiali
    Tang, Yiling
    Lin, Jingxia
    Faulkner, Guy
    Tsang, Hector W. H.
    Chan, Sunny H. W.
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 22 (01)