Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on walking and balance ability in Parkinson's patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Zhang, Xinxin [1 ]
Jing, Feiyue [1 ]
Liu, Yu'ang [1 ]
Tang, Jinyong [1 ]
Hua, Xianfeng [1 ]
Zhu, Jialin [1 ]
Tuo, Haowen [1 ]
Lin, Qihan [1 ]
Gao, Pincao [1 ]
Liu, Weiguo [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Normal Univ, Coll Phys Educ & Hlth, Guilin, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
non-invasive brain stimulation; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; transcranial direct current stimulation; Parkinson's disease; meta-analysis; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS; MOTOR CORTEX; DISEASE; GAIT; RTMS; DISORDERS; EFFICACY; SIGNS;
D O I
10.3389/fnagi.2022.1065126
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate and contrast the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), including repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), on walking and balance ability in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane, CNKI, and Chinese WanFang databases were searched up to June 2022. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias guidelines, and the standardized mean differences (SMD) or mean differences (MD) for each outcome were calculated.Results: Among 32 eligible studies, including 1,586 participants were analyzed in this meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that NIBS was effective in improving UPDRS-III scores (MD = -2.07; 95% CI, -2.62 to -1.53; P < 0.00001; I-2 = 6%) and variables associated with the ability of walk such as step width (SMD = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.16-0.55; P = 0.0005; I-2 = 38%), cadence (SMD = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.55; P = 0.02; I-2 = 25%), and 6MWT (MD = 62.86; 95% CI, 39.43-86.29; P < 0.00001; I-2 = 0%). In subgroup analyses across intervention types, UPDRS-III scores (rTMS: MD = -2.54; 95% CI, -3.16 to -1.92; P < 0.00001; I-2 = 0%; tDCS: MD = -1.20; 95% CI, -1.99 to -0.40; P = 0.003; I-2 = 0%) and TUGT time (rTMS: MD = -4.11; 95% CI, -4.74 to -3.47; P < 0.00001; I-2 = 0%; tDCS: MD = -0.84; 95% CI, -1.48 to -0.21; P = 0.009; I-2 = 0%) significantly improved. Moreover, our results also showed that compared to tDCS, rTMS was more significant in improving UPDRS-III scores and TUGT time (p < 0.05).Conclusion: NIBS benefits some walking ability variables but not balance ability in 36 patients with PD. The rTMS significantly improved UPDRS-III scores and TUGT time compared to tDCS. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal protocol and to illuminate effects based on the ideal target brain regions, stimulation intensity, timing, and type of intervention.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Efficacy of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Vision: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Bello, Umar Muhammad
    Wang, Jingying
    Park, Adela S. Y.
    Tan, Ken W. S.
    Cheung, Wing Sum
    Thompson, Benjamin
    Cheong, Allen M. Y.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [12] Non-invasive brain stimulation for patient with autism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Annan
    Gong, Chao
    Wang, Bobo
    Sun, Jiaxing
    Jiang, Zhimei
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 14
  • [13] Non-invasive brain stimulation for fatigue in multiple sclerosis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Mange
    Fan, Siyuan
    Xu, Yan
    Cui, Liying
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2019, 36
  • [14] Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation over the supplementary motor area on motor function in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Yawen
    Jiang, Hanhong
    Wei, Yixin
    Ye, Saiqing
    Jiang, Jiaxin
    Mak, Margaret
    Pang, Marco Y. C.
    Gao, Qiang
    Huang, Meizhen
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2025, 18 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [15] Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation for degenerative cerebellar ataxia: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Matsugi, Akiyoshi
    Ohtsuka, Hiroyuki
    Bando, Kyota
    Kondo, Yuki
    Kikuchi, Yutaka
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [16] Non-invasive brain stimulation for treating visual defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abbas, Ahmed W.
    Aboeldahab, Heba
    Zeid, Mohamed Abo
    Hassan, Amr K.
    Hindawi, Mahmoud Diaa
    Elrosasy, Amr
    Lorabi, Safia
    Hawas, Yousef
    Safwat, Benyameen
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2025,
  • [17] Non-invasive brain stimulation for posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rebecca L. D. Kan
    Bella B. B. Zhang
    Jack J. Q. Zhang
    Georg S. Kranz
    Translational Psychiatry, 10
  • [18] Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for disorders of consciousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dong, Linghui
    Li, Hui
    Dang, Hui
    Zhang, Xiaonian
    Yue, Shouwei
    Zhang, Hao
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [19] Modulation of Fear Extinction by Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Ye
    Lin, Jingyuan
    Dou, Haoran
    Zhang, Huoyin
    Cao, Ying
    Lei, Yi
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2025, 62 (02)
  • [20] Non-invasive brain stimulation for posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kan, Rebecca L. D.
    Zhang, Bella B. B.
    Zhang, Jack J. Q.
    Kranz, Georg S.
    TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 10 (01)