Effect of learning parameters on the performance of the U-Net architecture for cell nuclei segmentation from microscopic cell images

被引:8
作者
Jena, Biswajit [1 ]
Digdarshi, Dishant [2 ]
Paul, Sudip [3 ]
Nayak, Gopal K. [1 ]
Saxena, Sanjay [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Inst Informat Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Bhubaneswar 751003, India
[2] Indian Inst Sci Educ & Res, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Bhopal 462066, India
[3] North Eastern Hill Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Shillong 793002, Meghalaya, India
关键词
convolutional neural network; deep learning; U-Net; instance segmentation; nuclei segmentation;
D O I
10.1093/jmicro/dfac063
中图分类号
TH742 [显微镜];
学科分类号
摘要
Nuclei segmentation of cells is the preliminary and essential step of pathological image analysis. However, robust and accurate cell nuclei segmentation is challenging due to the enormous variability of staining, cell sizes, morphologies, cell adhesion or overlapping of the nucleus. The automation process to find the cell's nuclei is a giant leap in this direction and has an important step toward bioimage analysis using software tools. This article extensively analyzes deep U-Net architecture and has been applied to the Data Science Bowl dataset to segment the cell nuclei. The dataset undergoes various preprocessing tasks such as resizing, intensity normalization and data augmentation prior to segmentation. The complete dataset then undergoes the rigorous training and validation process to find the optimized hyperparameters and then the optimized model selection. The mean (m) +/- standard deviation (SD) of Intersection over Union (IoU) and F1-score (Dice score) have been calculated along with accuracy during the training and validation process, respectively. The optimized U-Net model results in a training IoU of 0.94 +/- 0.16 (m +/- SD), an F1-score of 0.94 +/- 0.17 (m +/- SD), a training accuracy of 95.54 and validation accuracy of 95.45. With this model, we applied a completely independent test cohort of the dataset and obtained the mean IOU of 0.93, F1-score of 0.9311, and mean accuracy of 94.12, respectively to measure the segmentation performance.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 264
页数:16
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Alberts B., 1989, MOL BIOL CELL, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781315735368
[2]   Pixelwise Instance Segmentation with a Dynamically Instantiated Network [J].
Arnab, Anurag ;
Torr, Philip H. S. .
30TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR 2017), 2017, :879-888
[3]   Performance evaluation of image segmentation algorithms on microscopic image data [J].
Benes, Miroslav ;
Zitova, Barbara .
JOURNAL OF MICROSCOPY, 2015, 257 (01) :65-85
[4]   An automatic method for robust and fast cell detection in bright field images from high-throughput microscopy [J].
Buggenthin, Felix ;
Marr, Carsten ;
Schwarzfischer, Michael ;
Hoppe, Philipp S. ;
Hilsenbeck, Oliver ;
Schroeder, Timm ;
Theis, Fabian J. .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 14
[5]  
Chaurasia A, 2017, 2017 IEEE VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS AND IMAGE PROCESSING (VCIP)
[6]  
Das Suchismita, 2021, Advances in Electronics, Communication and Computing. Select Proceedings of ETAEERE 2020. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering (LNEE 709), P119, DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-8752-8_12
[7]  
Das Suchismita, 2020, Progress in Computing, Analytics and Networking. Proceedings of ICCAN 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (AISC 1119), P105, DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-2414-1_11
[8]   Effect of learning parameters on the performance of U-Net Model in segmentation of Brain tumor [J].
Das, Suchsimita ;
Swain, Mahesh ku. ;
Nayak, G. K. ;
Saxena, Sanjay ;
Satpathy, S. C. .
MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 81 (24) :34717-34735
[9]   Combination of contrast limited adaptive histogram equalisation and discrete wavelet transform for image enhancement [J].
Huang Lidong ;
Zhao Wei ;
Wang Jun ;
Sun Zebin .
IET IMAGE PROCESSING, 2015, 9 (10) :908-915
[10]  
Jena Biswajit, 2021, Control Applications in Modern Power System. Select Proceedings of EPREC 2020. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering (LNEE 710), P427, DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-8815-0_37