Winners and Losers From Trade Agreements: Stock Market Reactions to TPP and TTIP

被引:2
作者
Dur, Andreas [1 ]
Lechner, Lisa [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salzburg, Dept Polit Sci, Salzburg, Austria
[2] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Polit Sci, Innsbruck, Austria
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
distributional effects; stock markets; trade agreements; TPP; TTIP; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; LIBERALIZATION; FIRM; PRODUCTIVITY; EVENT; RESPONSES; ACCESS;
D O I
10.17645/pag.v11i4.7146
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Which companies gain and which companies lose from trade agreements? In contrast to a view that sees the largest companies as the main beneficiaries of trade agreements, we argue that medium-sized companies gain the most from them. Moreover, we examine whether more capital-intensive and more diversified companies benefit more than other firms. Our empirical test relies on a dataset with daily firm-level stock price data for close to 4,000 US companies over the period 2009-2016. Concretely, we assess how the shares of different types of firms reacted to the news on the (lack of) progress of the negotiations aimed at concluding the TPP and TTIP. We find support for the view that medium-sized and diversified companies win the most from trade agreements. Besides speaking to the literature on the distributional effects of trade agreements, the article contributes to recent research on the role of firms in the international political economy and the stock market consequences of political events. It also presents a novel approach to measuring progress and stagnation in international trade negotiations using computational text analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 211
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Trade policy in a "GVC World": Multinational corporations and trade liberalization [J].
Anderer, Christina ;
Dur, Andreas ;
Lechner, Lisa .
BUSINESS AND POLITICS, 2020, 22 (04) :639-666
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, [No title captured], P68
[3]   Offshoring and the Role of Trade Agreements [J].
Antras, Pol ;
Staiger, Robert W. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (07) :3140-3183
[4]   The Distributional Consequences of Preferential Trade Liberalization: Firm-Level Evidence [J].
Baccini, Leonardo ;
Pinto, Pablo M. ;
Weymouth, Stephen .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2017, 71 (02) :373-395
[5]   Eliciting Substance from 'Hot Air': Financial Market Responses to EU Summit Decisions on European Defense [J].
Bechtel, Michael M. ;
Schneider, Gerald .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2010, 64 (02) :199-223
[6]   Plants and productivity in international trade [J].
Bernard, AB ;
Eaton, J ;
Jensen, JB ;
Kortum, S .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (04) :1268-1290
[7]   Firms in international trade [J].
Bernard, Andrew B. ;
Jensen, J. Bradford ;
Redding, Stephen J. ;
Schott, Peter K. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 21 (03) :105-130
[8]   Multiproduct Firms and Trade Liberalization [J].
Bernard, Andrew B. ;
Redding, Stephen J. ;
Schott, Peter K. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2011, 126 (03) :1271-1318
[9]   Heterogeneous firm-level responses to trade liberalization: A test using stock price reactions [J].
Breinlich, Holger .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 93 (02) :270-285
[10]   Firms in International Trade: Trade Policy Implications of the New New Trade Theory [J].
Ciuriak, Dan ;
Lapham, Beverly ;
Wolfe, Robert ;
Collins-Williams, Terry ;
Curtis, John .
GLOBAL POLICY, 2015, 6 (02) :130-140