Relative stability analysis for robustness design of real-time hybrid simulation

被引:3
作者
Zhou, Huimeng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Shao, Xiaoyun [5 ]
Zhang, Bo [2 ,6 ]
Tan, Ping [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Tao [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Univ, Earthquake Engn Res & Test Ctr, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Engn Mech, Key Lab Earthquake Engn & Engn Vibrat, Sanhe 065201, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Prov Key Lab Earthquake Engn & Appl Tech, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Minist Educ, Key Lab Earthquake Resistance Earthquake Mitigat &, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Western Michigan Univ, Kalamazoo, MI 49009 USA
[6] Minist Emergency Management, Key Lab Earthquake Disaster Mitigat, 29 Xuefu St, Beijing 150080, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划); 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Real-time hybrid simulation; Relative stability; Critical delay; Critical gain; Nonlinearity; DELAY COMPENSATION; ACCURACY ANALYSIS; SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE; ALGORITHM; INDICATOR; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107681
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Stability is a prerequisite of a successful real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS), which depends on the timeintegration algorithm, the delay-compensation method, the loading system dynamics (mostly characterized as a time delay), and the nonlinearity of the structures being tested. The existing stability analysis methods generally provide a qualitative judgement based on one or some of the factors above, without considering all these factors to estimate quantitative stability margin. However, it is critical to design a robust RTHS system with enough stability margin (i.e., robust RTHS system) to ensure the success of the actual test with inescapable uncertainties. To this end, a relative stability analysis method for robustness design of RTHS systems is proposed. In this method, the critical gain of the stiffness of an experimental substructure is used to quantify the stability limit, and the critical delay is used to quantitatively represent the sensitivity of an RTHS system to the phase discrepancy at the interface. The RTHS system with a nonlinear experimental substructure is modeled by a discrete transfer function in an incremental form, wherein the time-integration algorithm, the delaycompensation method, the loading system dynamics, and the nonlinearities of the experimental substructure are considered. The critical delay and gain are obtained from the discrete transfer function. Two relative stability criteria are proposed based on the critical delay and the critical gain of an RTHS system to facilitate the evaluation of the system's stability performance and the design of a robust RTHS system. To verify the critical delay and gain estimated using the proposed method, numerical simulation of RTHS systems was carried out first. Then RTHS experiments of single-degree-of-freedom models with experimental substructures consisting of a linear spring and a nonlinear stiffness hardening specimen were conducted. The consistent results of the numerical simulation and the physical RTHS tests with those derived from the proposed relative stability analysis method demonstrate its effectiveness and accuracy in determining the stability properties of RTHS systems, which can be further utilized in designing more robust RTHS testing systems.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Model-based framework for multi-axial real-time hybrid simulation testing [J].
Fermandois, Gaston A. ;
Spencer, Billie F., Jr. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION, 2017, 16 (04) :671-691
[32]   Towards Data-Driven Real-Time Hybrid Simulation: Adaptive Modeling of Control Plants [J].
Simpson, Thomas ;
Dertimanis, Vasilis K. ;
Chatzi, Eleni N. .
FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 6
[33]   Real-Time Simulation of Hybrid Microgrid for Islanding Detection Analysis [J].
Harikrishna, M. ;
Jena, Premalata .
2016 IEEE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER SYSTEMS (ICPS), 2016,
[34]   Feedforward actuator controller development using the backward-difference method for real-time hybrid simulation [J].
Phillips, Brian M. ;
Takada, Shuta ;
Spencer, B. F., Jr. ;
Fujino, Yozo .
SMART STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS, 2014, 14 (06) :1081-1103
[35]   Development and verification of real-time hybrid simulation with deep learning-based nonlinear numerical substructure [J].
Chen, Pei-Ching ;
Hsu, Shang-Chi ;
Ma, Chung-Chun .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2024, 53 (06) :2141-2161
[36]   Experimental verification of a frequency domain evaluation index-based compensation for real-time hybrid simulation [J].
Xu, Weijie ;
Guo, Tong ;
Chen, Cheng ;
Chen, Menghui ;
Chen, Kai .
STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2020, 27 (12)
[37]   Adaptive compensation for multi-axial real-time hybrid simulation via nonlinear parameter estimation [J].
Ruiz, Santiago ;
Song, Wei .
FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 10
[38]   Robust Model Predictive Control for Dynamics Compensation in Real-Time Hybrid Simulation [J].
Tsokanas, Nikolaos ;
Wagg, David ;
Stojadinovic, Bozidar .
FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 6
[39]   Discrete-Time Compensation Technique for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation [J].
Hayati, Saeid ;
Song, Wei .
ROTATING MACHINERY, HYBRID TEST METHODS, VIBRO-ACOUSTICS AND LASER VIBROMETRY, VOL 8, 2016, :351-358
[40]   High performance compensation using an adaptive strategy for real-time hybrid simulation [J].
Wang, Zhen ;
Ning, Xizhan ;
Xu, Guoshan ;
Zhou, Huimeng ;
Wu, Bin .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2019, 133