Pig slurry doses affect plant growth and corn grain yield

被引:0
|
作者
Gisch, Pedro Henrique [1 ]
Redin, Marciel [1 ]
de Souza, Eduardo Lorensi [1 ]
da Silva, Danni Maisa [1 ]
Guerra, Divanilde [1 ]
Lanzanova, Mastrangello Enivar [1 ]
Gehlen Bohrer, Robson Evaldo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Rio Grande do Sul, Tres Passos, RS, Brazil
来源
NATIVA | 2024年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
Zea mays; organic fertilization; animal manure; fertilization efficiency; MAIZE YIELD;
D O I
10.31413/nativa.v12i1.14874
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The aim was to evaluate the performance of corn grown with different doses of pig slurry (PS), compared to mineral fertilization (NPK) and without fertilization. Four doses of PS were evaluated from the need of the crop (50%, 100%, 150% and 200%), NPK and without fertilization (control), five replications each treatment, with a randomized block design under field conditions. The production of total dry matter (DM), stems (DMS) and leaves (DML), yield components ear length (EL), number of rows of grains per ear (NRGE), number of grains per ear (NGE) and number of ears per square meter (NESM), grain yield (GY) and corn harvest index. The doses of 100%, 150% and 200% of PS were equivalent to NPK, both for DM production (mean 6,077 kg/ha), and for DMS (4,000 kg/ha) and DML (2,076 kg/ha). Corn fertilized with 50% PS showed higher NESM (23) compared to the control (19) and there was no significant difference between the doses of PS and NPK (mean 20.9). The 200% PS dose matched the NPK treatment in NGE (mean 412), NRGE (12.1) and GY (12,674 kg/ha). The PS doses of 50, 100 and 150% of the recommended are not equivalent to NPK fertilization, reducing, respectively, 175, 115 and 114% of GY.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 146
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFECTS OF GENOTYPE, PLANTING PATTERN, AND PLANT DENSITY ON PLANT-TO-PLANT VARIABILITY AND GRAIN YIELD OF CORN
    GLENN, FB
    DAYNARD, TB
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1974, 54 (02) : 323 - 330
  • [32] Dietary effects on the composition of pig slurry and on the plant utilization of pig slurry nitrogen
    Sorensen, P
    Fernández, JA
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2003, 140 : 343 - 355
  • [33] CANOPY ARCHITECTURE AT VARIOUS POPULATION DENSITIES AND GROWTH AND GRAIN YIELD OF CORN
    WILLIAMS, WA
    LOOMIS, RS
    DUNCAN, WG
    DOVRAT, A
    NUNEZ, F
    CROP SCIENCE, 1968, 8 (03) : 303 - &
  • [34] Tillage and compost effects on corn growth, nutrient accumulation, and grain yield
    Singer, Jeremy W.
    Logsdon, Sally D.
    Meek, David W.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2007, 99 (01) : 80 - 87
  • [35] Vegetation sensors as a tool for plant population identification and corn grain yield estimation
    Vian, Andre Luis
    Bredemeier, Christian
    Drum, Maicon Andreo
    Fernandes Pires, Joao Leonando
    Fochesatto, Elizandro
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA TROPICAL, 2021, 51
  • [36] PLANT DENSITY EFFECT ON GRAIN YIELD OF CORN HYBRIDS DIVERSE IN LEAF ORIENTATION
    HICKS, DR
    STUCKER, RE
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1972, 64 (04) : 484 - &
  • [37] Row spacing, plant density, and hybrid effects on corn grain yield and moisture
    Farnham, DE
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2001, 93 (05) : 1049 - 1053
  • [38] Plant Density and Hybrid Impacts on Corn Grain and Forage Yield and Nutrient Uptake
    Raymond, F. Doug
    Alley, Mark M.
    Parrish, David J.
    Thomason, Wade E.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2009, 32 (03) : 395 - 409
  • [39] Within-row plant spacing variability does not affect corn yield
    Liu, WD
    Tollenaar, M
    Stewart, G
    Deen, W
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2004, 96 (01) : 275 - 280
  • [40] Using drones to detect and quantify wild pig damage and yield loss in corn fields throughout plant growth stages
    Friesenhahn, Bethany A.
    Massey, Lori D.
    DeYoung, Randy W.
    Cherry, Michael J.
    Fischer, Justin W.
    Snow, Nathan P.
    VerCauteren, Kurt C.
    Perotto-Baldivieso, Humberto L.
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2023, 47 (02):