Extramedullary versus intramedullary fixation of unstable trochanteric femoral fractures (AO type 31-A2): a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:7
作者
Zeelenberg, Miliaan L. [1 ]
Plaisier, A. Cornelis [1 ]
Nugteren, Leendert H. T. [1 ]
Loggers, Sverre A. I. [1 ,2 ]
Joosse, Pieter [2 ]
Verhofstad, Michiel H. J. [1 ]
Den Hartog, Dennis [1 ]
Van Lieshout, Esther M. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Trauma Res Unit Dept Surg, Trauma Res Unit, Dept Surg, POB 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Dept Surg, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, Netherlands
关键词
Trochanteric; Hip fracture; Intramedullary; Extramedullary; AO type 31-A2; SLIDING HIP SCREW; INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; NAIL ANTIROTATION; GAMMA-NAIL; MORTALITY; FEMUR; MANAGEMENT; DISABILITY; OUTCOMES; PLATE;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-023-05138-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective The aim of this systematic review was to compare extramedullary fixation and intramedullary fixation for AO type 31-A2 trochanteric fractures in the elderly, with regard to functional outcomes, complications, surgical outcomes, and costs. Methods Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Effect estimates were pooled across studies using random effects models. Results are presented as weighted risk ratio (RR) or weighted mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results Fourteen RCTs (2039 patients) and 13 observational studies (22,123 patients) were included. Statistically superior results in favor of intramedullary fixation were found for Harris Hip Score (MD 4.09, 95% CI 0.91-7.26, p = 0.04), Parker mobility score (MD - 0.67 95% CI - 1.2 to - 0.17, p = 0.009), lower extremity measure (MD - 4.07 95% CI - 7.4 to - 0.8, p = 0.02), time to full weight bearing (MD 1.14 weeks CI 0.92-1.35, p < 0.001), superficial infection (RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.18-3.58, p = 0.01), nonunion (RR 3.67, 95% CI 1.03-13.10, p = 0.05), fixation failure (RR 2.26, 95% CI 1.16-4.44, p = 0.02), leg shortening (MD 2.23 mm, 95% CI 0.81-3.65, p = 0.002), time to radiological bone healing (MD 2.19 months, 95% CI 0.56-3.83, p = 0.009), surgery duration (MD 11.63 min, 95% CI 2.63-20.62, p = 0.01), operative blood loss (MD 134.5 mL, 95% CI 51-218, p = 0.002), and tip-apex distance > 25 mm (RR 1.73, 95% CI 1.10-2.74, p = 0.02). No comparable cost/costs-effectiveness data were available. Conclusion Current literature shows that several functional outcomes, complications, and surgical outcomes were statistically in favor of intramedullary fixation when compared with extramedullary fixation of AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures. However, as several of the differences found appear not to be clinically relevant and for many outcomes data remains sparse or heterogeneous, complete superiority of IM fixation for AO type 31-A2 fractures remains to be confirmed in a detailed cost-effectiveness analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1189 / 1209
页数:21
相关论文
共 55 条
[31]  
Page MJ, 2021, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V372, DOI [10.1136/bmj.n71, 10.1136/bmj.n160]
[32]   Changing trends in the management of intertrochanteric hip fractures - A single centre experience [J].
Page, Piers R. J. ;
Lord, Roxana ;
Jawad, Ahsin ;
Dawe, Edward ;
Stott, Philip ;
Rogers, Benedict ;
Gill, Richie .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 (07) :1525-1529
[33]   Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a dynamic hip screw or a proximal femoral nail - A randomised study comparing post-operative rehabilitation [J].
Pajarinen, J ;
Lindahl, J ;
Michelsson, O ;
Savolainen, V ;
Hirvensalo, E .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2005, 87B (01) :76-81
[34]  
Parker MJ, 2005, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD000093.pub3, 10.1002/14651858.CD000093.pub5]
[35]   Sliding hip screw versus intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures; a randomised trial of 1000 patients with presentation of results related to fracture stability [J].
Parker, Martyn J. .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2017, 48 (12) :2762-2767
[36]   No Difference in Conversion Rate to Hip Arthroplasty After Intramedullary Nail or Sliding Hip Screw for Extracapsular Hip Fractures An Observational Cohort Study of 19,604 Individuals [J].
Pyrhonen, Helmi-Sisko ;
Lagergren, Johan ;
Wolf, Olof ;
Bojan, Alicja ;
Mukka, Sebastian ;
Moller, Michael ;
Rogmark, Cecilia .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2022, 104 (19) :1703-1711
[37]   Intramedullary Versus Extramedullary Fixation for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Reindl, Rudolf ;
Harvey, Edward J. ;
Berry, Gregory K. ;
Rahme, Elham .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 97A (23) :1905-1912
[38]  
Saleem M, 2020, RAWAL MED J, V45, P648
[39]  
Schurch MA, 1996, J BONE MINER RES, V11, P1935
[40]   Comparison of functional outcomes in patients fixed with dynamic hip screw and proximal femur nail-anti-rotation in A1 and A2 type intertrochanteric femur fractures [J].
Sevinc, Huseyin Fatih ;
Cirpar, Meric ;
Canbeyli, Ibrahim Deniz ;
Daglar, Bulent ;
Oktas, Birhan ;
Durusoy, Serhat .
ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2020, 26 (05) :811-817