The effects of recalling and imagining prompts on writing engagement, syntactic and lexical complexity, accuracy, and fluency: A partial replication of Cho (2019)

被引:1
作者
Mujtaba, Syed Muhammad [3 ]
Reynolds, Barry Lee [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Yang [4 ]
Parkash, Rakesh [3 ]
Ha, Xuan Van [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Macau, Fac Educ, Taipa, Macau, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Macau, Ctr Cognit & Brain Sci, Taipa, Macau, Peoples R China
[3] Bahria Univ, Dept Humanities & Social Sci, Karachi Campus, Karachi, Pakistan
[4] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Foreign Languages, Xian, Peoples R China
[5] Macquarie Univ, Grad Res Acad, N Ryde, Australia
[6] Ha Tinh Univ, Dept Foreign Languages, Ha Tinh, Vietnam
关键词
writing prompt; fluency; accuracy; syntactic complexity; lexical complexity; engagement; COGNITIVE TASK COMPLEXITY; SLA; EFL;
D O I
10.1515/opli-2022-0259
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This replication study examined the effects of writing prompt type on second language (L2) learners' writing performance. Fifty undergraduate academic and professional writing course pupils wrote narrative essays about a past event (recalling group/high formulation demand condition) or a future event (imagining group/high conceptualization demand condition). Writers completed a freewriting draft and were then given unlimited opportunities to revise. The writing was subjected to syntactic complexity, fluency, accuracy, and lexical complexity analyses. Writer engagement was computed as the time spent revising drafts. The previous study's results were confirmed in that the recalling group exhibited more complexity and less accuracy in their writing than the imagining group. The recalling group also exhibited a higher level of writing fluency and possessed a higher level of engagement. Furthermore, the results of our study showed that the imagining group produced writing that was slightly more lexically complex than the recalling group. The pedagogical importance of writing prompts and their potential for affecting writing performance and writing engagement was discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Arnold J., 2007, Imagine that! Mental imagery in the EFL classroom
[2]  
Baralt M., 2016, PEER INTERACTION 2 L, P209
[3]   Using the Sociocognitive-Transformative Approach in Writing Classrooms: Effects on L2 Learners' Writing Performance [J].
Barrot, Jessie S. .
READING & WRITING QUARTERLY, 2018, 34 (02) :187-201
[4]  
Beer C., 2010, P ASCILITE SYDNEY, P75
[5]  
Biber D., 2021, The register-functional approach to grammatical complexity: Theoretical foundation, descriptive research findings, application
[6]   Investigating grammatical complexity in L2 English writing research: Linguistic description versus predictive measurement [J].
Biber, Douglas ;
Gray, Bethany ;
Staples, Shelley ;
Egbert, Jesse .
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 2020, 46
[7]  
BOX GEP, 1949, BIOMETRIKA, V36, P317, DOI 10.1093/biomet/36.3-4.317
[8]  
Chen Pu-Shih D., 2008, Innovate: Journal of Online Education, V3
[9]  
Chlarson Kelsey J., 2011, Effects of high-interest writing prompts on performance of students with learning disabilities
[10]   The effects of prompts on L2 writing performance and engagement [J].
Cho, Minyoung .
FOREIGN LANGUAGE ANNALS, 2019, 52 (03) :576-594